ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - CuilTard - 07-06-2019 (07-05-2019, 11:35 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Can they actually fine a monthly pass holder for not tapping? I can't find the bylaw governing public transit payments on the region's site. There was a discussion about this on reddit, and based on the wording on GRT's site, the conclusion was that a monthly pass counts as proof-of-payment, regardless of whether it's been tapped or not** https://www.reddit.com/r/waterloo/comments/c6nm1b/ticket_inspectors_on_lrt/es9xw0y?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x **redditors are self-proclaimed experts and should not be used as official policy. Viewer discretion is advised. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jeffster - 07-06-2019 So apparently Ottawa is in good shape compared to us: https://www.ottawamatters.com/local-news/ottawas-lrt-problems-seem-small-compared-to-kitcheners-ion-1544944 TLR - Ottawa's system doesn't mix with traffic, Kitchener's (Waterloo) does. While it would have been nice to have a separate system, these cities weren't designed to even make this happen, IMHO. Though much of the LRT doesn't mix traffic, such as parts of Waterloo from Uptown to Northfield and in Kitchener from Bordon to Fairview. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 07-06-2019 (07-06-2019, 12:20 PM)jeffster Wrote: So apparently Ottawa is in good shape compared to us: I'd argue this is a highly unfair comparison, and is no doubt an Ottawa oriented view to justify the expense of their tunneling. First, our system hasn't been "problematic"...collisions, while headline grabbing aren't excessively common or harmful. Also, our LRVs don't "mingle" with traffic, and aren't delayed by traffic. Segregating from traffic by levels (with tunnels) as opposed to time (with signals) is a choice about whether the land value justifies tunneling for greater transportation capacity. Given that in Ottawa's case (and in most cases) cars are the ones who gain the space, one must consider the real beneficiaries of tunneling. In any case, the real issues we're facing right now are publicly, the payment system appears to be nearly completely broken, and in secret, ATP is still not operating, and thus speeds are reduced...ironically, this only affects non-road-running segments. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 07-06-2019 It's bloody rich for a city whose LRT system has also been plagued by delays, couldn't get their trains working properly in the winter, has suffered multiple derails, is missing crucial equipment, etc. to brag about how much better they're doing than the city with a working LRT. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 07-06-2019 (07-05-2019, 04:13 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(07-05-2019, 01:16 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Students will tend to pay little to no income tax. I'll just point you to the words I used in my post (highlighted above) ... RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - bgb_ca - 07-06-2019 Well I picked a bad time to take a ride. I was on 505 and then bang, several incidents happened. The train held at GRH station, where the driver announced a delay. I flipped on the tuner to hear the LRV had a pannel fall off in cab C. Driver put the panel back on, but some error codes came on. There was another issue appearantly on another lrv with a fight. They are setting up a Bus Bridge. I just hopped off and hopped on the 7. Edit: they just deboarded 505. Edit2: as I got to Central, a replacement shuttle arrived. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 07-06-2019 (07-06-2019, 02:20 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(07-05-2019, 04:13 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: However, that is because they have little to no income, not because they are students. So it is not correct to say that “students” don’t pay income tax unless it is clear that one is talking about a tendency or correlation. Touché. I need to read the actual words more carefully! Actually I think your post was a good one — you summarized some of the different taxes that students paid, and correctly pointed out that on average students pay little income tax. Mostly I wanted to highlight that the low income tax payment was not student-specific — but especially given my choice of words, I should have acknowledged that you yourself had referred to a tendency. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 07-06-2019 (07-06-2019, 02:06 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: It's bloody rich for a city whose LRT system has also been plagued by delays, couldn't get their trains working properly in the winter, has suffered multiple derails, is missing crucial equipment, etc. to brag about how much better they're doing than the city with a working LRT. Yes, a ridiculous article. We haven’t had big problems, other than the long delays. Even our collisions don’t really qualify as major difficulty — it’s inevitable that KW drivers gonna be KW drivers. By the time they carry one passenger we will have been operating mostly successfully for weeks. To see yard derailments, vehicles not working properly in winter, and still no specific opening date as small compared to a successful open takes a weird kind of lack of awareness. I do have to mention that I have some questions about this ATP not yet being implemented. Our friend Canardiain asked about this on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Canardiain/status/1146893896275783680 It’s a bit strange. First, what do they mean by “under development”? It’s not a new feature. Second, what have they been doing for the last two years? If there had been no problems at all at Bombardier, would we have opened any earlier? I’m thinking that maybe Metrolinx might still have been just as late with the specialized equipment, and maybe ATP would still be “under development” regardless. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ert86 - 07-07-2019 (07-06-2019, 12:18 PM)CuilTard Wrote:I overheard someone on the train telling an inspector that they have a monthly pass but weren't sure the tap went through because they were rushing to get on, and it sounded like the inspector needed to take extra steps to see if they had a valid pass instead of just taping the card and moving on.(07-05-2019, 11:35 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Can they actually fine a monthly pass holder for not tapping? I can't find the bylaw governing public transit payments on the region's site. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 07-07-2019 (07-06-2019, 12:20 PM)jeffster Wrote: So apparently Ottawa is in good shape compared to us: The only aspect of this article I can agree with is that by having our LRT mix with traffic (many are going argue it doesn't, but it still crosses a lot of city streets) it causes some issues. Obviously, traffic accidents have been and will continue to be a problem. Another is that the train is going to be limited in speed along many parts of its route because it can't exactly go over streets/intersections/corners at a high speed...look at the turns at Allen or near Courtland - you could almost just get out and walk faster. And launching the service without the ATP operating also slows things down. I don't understand how they had years of time to get things ready, and they launch it without this, forcing the trains to go incredibly slow. The ION is more like a city tram/streetcar system, similar to a lot of the lines in Toronto, rather than legitimate light trail. Ottawa has a more proper LRT, completely grade separated with its stations underground or in good locations on the surface, and the rails always separated from traffic by taking efficient routes or going right under any roads in the way. It will be multitudes more efficient than the ION once it is running. Obviously Waterloo Region had to do the ION the way they did because the urban planning in the city has always emphasized vehicles, and for even more historical reasons, the streets evolved to be a mess. But it would have been nice to see some of the stations underground or in trenches, but that would have drove up costs to the point in which nobody would want to fund it. Or, at least have looked into more potential routes where street crossings were more or less eliminated. I love the fact the ION is here, but it's disappointing. It's hard to see it as anything more than a tram/streetcar network. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 07-07-2019 (07-07-2019, 11:19 AM)ac3r Wrote: I love the fact the ION is here, but it's disappointing. It's hard to see it as anything more than a tram/streetcar network. I would say it’s definitely well above a streetcar network. The off-street sections are a significant fraction of the total system, although the failure to implement ATP promptly is perplexing and disappointing. Even limited to 50km/h though it goes pretty quickly in those areas. On street it definitely should run faster. It does not get as much signal priority as it could — sometimes it doesn’t even get the next cycle, never mind pre-empting the regular operation of the signals. Also, they are excessively cautious with speeds. If a section of street is signed for 50km/h, that means cars are actually going 60km/h. So why can’t the LRT go that speed? And that’s even assuming the LRT should be limited to the speed of traffic. Since it’s well established that adjacent lanes of traffic can go at different speeds, even when separated only by a dashed white line meaning cars may switch lanes wherever and whenever, why can’t the LRT go at a different speed than traffic in the adjacent lane, separated by a curb? I think the LRT limit should be 70km/h on street running and 90km/h off street, although realistically there are few if any places where it could actually accelerate to 90km/h before needing to begin slowing down for the next station. On the plus side, from riding it a few times, it’s clear that maintaining the current schedule is ridiculously easy. Since they’re already talking about making some speed improvements, I think there is reason to be optimistic that it will run faster in the future, even without adopting some of my less likely suggestions. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 07-07-2019 Was ATP in use during testing? The trains were definitely running faster than 50km/h in some sections. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 07-07-2019 I believe so...I think I read on Twitter that it was shut off again around the time the service launched. Edit: I think it was this post, which implies they were going faster during testing: https://twitter.com/Canardiain/status/1146893896275783680 RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 07-07-2019 (07-07-2019, 01:32 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Was ATP in use during testing? The trains were definitely running faster than 50km/h in some sections. I have no idea. However during testing they do things they won’t do in regular service; depending on what they’re doing they might only have one vehicle out on the line, for example, eliminating the possibility of collisions. I believe they even traversed the line at speeds slightly higher than the limits, which they would never do regularly. Funny thing is, I don’t even see why ATP is needed. We regularly run buses at 120km/h on line-of-sight with 3 lanes full of random idiots driving even faster and weaving in and out, so 70km/h on a gently curving single track with excellent visiblity and no non-transit vehicles shouldn’t be a problem. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - kps - 07-07-2019 (07-07-2019, 12:35 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: I think the LRT limit should be 70km/h on street running and 90km/h off street, although realistically there are few if any places where it could actually accelerate to 90km/h before needing to begin slowing down for the next station. The vehicles top out at 80 km/h, even in a straight line, and can't do curves at any speed since the lack of yaw (either between modules or at nonexistent bogies) means they can't be banked. |