Grand River Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
|
RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 04-02-2017 "Then again, letting people see that disruption firsthand would help cement how important transit is." I think that's optimistic. The effect of the LTC strike seemed to be increased animosity towards the system, and an increased attitude that it could not be relied on. I know that in London at that time, a lot of people took permanent travel decisions (I mean like buying a car) during or soon after the strike. Fingers crossed that this deal is accepted and we don't need to go through a service disruption. RE: Grand River Transit - trainspotter139 - 04-03-2017 Quote:GRT Union Members Ratify New Deal; Strike Averted RE: Grand River Transit - Viewfromthe42 - 04-04-2017 Of note, new buses will now feature shields between the drivers and the rest of the bus. RE: Grand River Transit - Canard - 04-04-2017 I just got this hilarious mental image of the Lexan "blast shields" that the folks in the woodwinds section of the KSO have with the brass right behind them. Makes me laugh every time. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 04-04-2017 I find that really disappointing. Is the job really risky enough to justify that? Is Waterloo Region really that dangerous? The riding experience will really be altered with the introduction of plexiglass bubbles separating the driver from the clientele. In Winnipeg, there are calls for those kinds of shields after a recent murder of a bus driver, and an uptick in the rate (I can't remember from what to what) of assaults on drivers. Are issues like that significant here? Or are some folks just watching too much CNN? RE: Grand River Transit - Viewfromthe42 - 04-04-2017 It's going to create a different experience, for sure. To me, yes, it will make it a less pleasant interaction with the driver. But if they are the ones feeling unsafe, I have to want them to feel safe in the end. On the perhaps plus side, it should make it too impossible for the bus-driver-conversationalist to carry on a chat with the driver, preventing them from blocking access to the bus as I've often run into. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 04-04-2017 No more bus-driver-conversationalists...imagine the drivers losing the ability to chat with anyone over the course of an entire shift... I just noticed, though, that it says "trial process." I wonder what that means, but assume there will be some information gathering from drivers and riders alike at some point. No harm in trying it out to see how it improves drivers' feelings of safety versus their and riders' experiences. RE: Grand River Transit - Coke6pk - 04-04-2017 (04-04-2017, 09:38 AM)MidTowner Wrote: I find that really disappointing. Is the job really risky enough to justify that? Is Waterloo Region really that dangerous? The riding experience will really be altered with the introduction of plexiglass bubbles separating the driver from the clientele. Are we that dangerous, no. Could we be, yes. As much as I don't support the bubble, I can't support a "wait until a driver is murdered" before we react. Coke RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 04-04-2017 Buses in Toronto have these. It's up to the driver if they close it; they can secure it in the open position if they wish. It's often left open in quiet midday periods, for example, but will be closed after dark, in particular neighbourhoods, or when carrying rowdier groups like sports fans or high schoolers. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 04-04-2017 Coke6pk, I am quite sure you couldn't have read my comment as a suggestion that we "wait until a driver is murdered"...I'm comparing the safety concerns in a jurisdiction that has experienced actual violence, with what actually happens here, where you say the situation isn't dangerous, but "could be." KevinL, thanks for the info about the configuration of these barriers in Toronto. RE: Grand River Transit - Coke6pk - 04-05-2017 (04-04-2017, 09:08 PM)MidTowner Wrote: Coke6pk, I am quite sure you couldn't have read my comment as a suggestion that we "wait until a driver is murdered"...I'm comparing the safety concerns in a jurisdiction that has experienced actual violence, with what actually happens here, where you say the situation isn't dangerous, but "could be." I'm not putting those words into your mouth by any means... however, some employers are very reactive as opposed to being proactive, and I'm glad GRT took the correct route. Coke RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 04-05-2017 Since it's a "pilot," I can't do anything but agree with you that putting this thing on trial and seeing what the impacts are is the correct route. Introducing something as drastic as a plexiglass shield separating drivers from their clients without even consulting the clients wouldn't be. But I'm assuming that there will be an opportunity to voice concerns about the shields before they're adopted wholesale, if there are any concerns. RE: Grand River Transit - yige_t - 04-05-2017 (04-05-2017, 05:13 PM)MidTowner Wrote: Since it's a "pilot," I can't do anything but agree with you that putting this thing on trial and seeing what the impacts are is the correct route. Introducing something as drastic as a plexiglass shield separating drivers from their clients without even consulting the clients wouldn't be. But I'm assuming that there will be an opportunity to voice concerns about the shields before they're adopted wholesale, if there are any concerns. Why should riders be consulted about this? This is about the safety of drivers. Verbal assaults and spitting on drivers is real. It does happen in this Region, and they should be treated as seriously as the more aggressive behaviours. And I can imagine drivers feeling especially vulnerable during the last bargaining process + constant strike threats... Anything to make their job comfortable. I don't see how passengers can be negatively affected by this at all. A driver's job is to drive a bus, not chatting with passengers. It's not like you can't ask drivers questions anymore (while bus is stopped) - they can still hear you over the plexiglass... And besides, nobody should be talking while the bus is moving anyways, it's distracting. RE: Grand River Transit - danbrotherston - 04-05-2017 (04-05-2017, 05:45 PM)yige_t Wrote:(04-05-2017, 05:13 PM)MidTowner Wrote: Since it's a "pilot," I can't do anything but agree with you that putting this thing on trial and seeing what the impacts are is the correct route. Introducing something as drastic as a plexiglass shield separating drivers from their clients without even consulting the clients wouldn't be. But I'm assuming that there will be an opportunity to voice concerns about the shields before they're adopted wholesale, if there are any concerns. Passengers (and even the region as a whole) are affected by the appearance of unfriendliness and of danger. That being said, it disgusts me that such things could even be necessary. Who spits on a driver?! Why don't these people end charged with assault? RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 04-05-2017 yige_t, I can't really understand the comment that "Verbal assaults and spitting...should be treated as seriously as the more aggressive behaviours." Obviously those things are serious and should be treated seriously. But, no, "verbal assaults" aren't as serious as physical assaults. Both should be prosecuted, both should be mitigated, but they can't be treated the same. Highly visible safety precautions like this obviously impact riders. It sends a clear message that the drivers at least consider the bus dangerous. It does impact communication, even if drivers and riders can still hear each other. Of course the safety (and, probably more relevantly in this case, the perception of safety) of the drivers is important. But the amount that any precaution adds to safety should be balanced against how it impacts service. If "safety" were the only criteria, with no regard to rider experience, the precautions we could take would be only limited by the imagination. |