Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ookpik - 07-29-2015

Speaking of schedules and delays and such, this doesn't bode well for us, even if the cars are different. Ir seems Bombardier is preoccupied with meeting Toronto's demands as well as mulling over a possible sale or merger of their rail division with Siemens.

Toronto transit mulls banning Bombardier as latest streetcar deadline missed 
Quote:Bombardier has admitted that it will not hit its latest target for delivering streetcars to Toronto, the news coming as the increasingly unhappy TTC board prepares to weigh options for barring the company from bidding on contracts...

Fewer than 10 streetcars have been delivered since the new ones began to enter service a year ago. This falls well short of every production schedule Bombardier has proposed.

The Bombardier statement Wednesday said that the company had “taken a strategic step back” to overhaul their quality control. They are now promising four vehicles per month, beginning in September.

“We think, finally, we have a credible schedule,” said Andy Byford, CEO of the TTC. “The issue now is, the acid test is, will we start to see quality vehicles roll off that production line? Because we’re going to hold them to that.”


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MacBerry - 07-29-2015

(07-27-2015, 09:19 PM)timio Wrote:
(07-27-2015, 07:07 PM)KevinL Wrote: Any guesses on the purpose of the smaller, round culverts to the sides of the main passages?

Likely overflow for the extreme rainfall that comes every now and again.  Or for the ducks.

It is the new fish ladder for the migrating Blue Gills or was that Sunfish during spring flood times?   Dodgy

I actually used to catch Sunfish in this pond ... way back in the day.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 07-29-2015

(07-29-2015, 05:00 PM)ookpik Wrote: Speaking of schedules and delays and such, this doesn't bode well for us, even if the cars are different. Ir seems Bombardier is preoccupied with meeting Toronto's demands as well as mulling over a possible sale or merger of their rail division with Siemens.

Is it the same factory for Toronto and our LRT?

You can bet that the guys building rail cars are not the same ones that are working on selling the division.  And it's in BBD's interest to keep things on track (pun intended!) at the rail division in order to maximize its value.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - DHLawrence - 07-29-2015

All the same place - Bombardier's plant in Thunder Bay. They also build GO's bilevels. They certainly aren't filling anyone with confidence with this project.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - BuildingScout - 07-29-2015

(07-29-2015, 11:24 PM)BrianT Wrote: If Mexico can't produce a satisfactory product, maybe it's time to cut them out of the manufacturing chain.

The original report said that the problems stemmed from improper engineering, not assembly. Here are the components that are manufactured successfully at the Mexican Bombardier plant:

Mexico City metro cars Sistema de Transporte Eléctrico (STE) Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) (México City) Monterrey city metro - Metrorrey Minneapolis Light Rail Vehicle (LRV) GM-AMD, Locomotives Agence Métropolitaine de Transport (AMT) (Montreal) Vancouver, Advanced Rapid Transit (ART) Kuala Lumpur, Advanced Rapid Transit (ART) Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Metro cars New Jersey Transit (NJT), BOMBARDIER Bi-Level (New Jersey) Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), Toronto Rocket Société de Transport de Montréal (STM), Montreal Metro, Progress Rail Locomotives, commuter rail for New Jersey Transit (USA), trams and light rail for Toronto, Canada (Toronto Transit Commission and Metrolinx), metro cars for Toronto, Chicago, New York City Transit (NYCT) and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) in San Francisco, California, among others.

and

Originally, the glacial rate of production was blamed on a strike at the Thunder Bay plant and the tricky design of the TTC's unique, two-stage-wheelchair ramp. It was subsequently revealed, however, that there were significant issues with parts suppliers, including a plant in Mexico, and manufacturing difficulties in Ontario. TTC CEO Andy Byford has said that the cars were initially so poorly fitted that they were being riveted together and would have fallen apart on Toronto's streets.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - BuildingScout - 07-30-2015

(07-30-2015, 01:53 AM)BrianT Wrote: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/terminating-bombardier-streetcar-contract-on-the-table-ttc-says-1.3172593

But CBC News has learned that some employees at Bombardier in Thunder Bay have lost their jobs over the company's failed attempts to meet production deadlines.

"We've replaced employees that were ineffective, we made additional investments in our tooling, in our resources and we deployed our top quality experts to the sites that are working on the project," Lefebvre said in an interview.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - numberguy - 07-30-2015

(07-29-2015, 09:50 PM)tomh009 Wrote: You can bet that the guys building rail cars are not the same ones that are working on selling the division.  And it's in BBD's interest to keep things on track (pun intended!) at the rail division in order to maximize its value.

Bombardier's corporate focus is clearly on aviation. They've already doubled down on their bet on regional aircraft. It doesn't matter what their rail division does, if their regional aircraft don't sell, Bombardier is done. Their best assets and people are on their aviation side.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 07-30-2015

(07-29-2015, 10:46 PM)DHLawrence Wrote: All the same place - Bombardier's plant in Thunder Bay. They also build GO's bilevels. They certainly aren't filling anyone with confidence with this project.

And yet the Bi-Level coaches keep rolling off the line from that very same plant with no issue - in fact, all the new cab cars are quietly going into service with no media fanfare - because nobody cares when things go right.  And, 98% of the time, they go right.

The problems in Mexico are already fixed.  They were fixed months ago.  This isn't news - this is more sensationalist media drama and TTC trying to push the blame for their poor service onto someone else.  Bombardier is a bit behind, and are catching up - but not at the pace that the TTC is happy with.  Threatening to omit Bombardier from future orders is the stupidest thing they could do.  What motivation have they got to do a good job on this order if they know TTC is going to cut them out from future orders?  The fault is squarely on the TTC for not building in a better penalty clause - and now they're trying to make up for it.

I am so sick and tired of everyone crapping all over Bombardier.  They make the best rail product out there, period, and are going to deliver in Waterloo region, too.

And let me just reiterate something, because it seems to get lost a lot here (and in the news) - There is absolutely zero reason to believe that our trains are behind schedule, or will be behind schedule.  They have not started building them yet.  The issues around Flexity Outlook are resolved for TTC's order.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 07-30-2015

(07-30-2015, 10:22 AM)Canard Wrote:
(07-29-2015, 10:46 PM)DHLawrence Wrote: All the same place - Bombardier's plant in Thunder Bay. They also build GO's bilevels. They certainly aren't filling anyone with confidence with this project.

And yet the Bi-Level coaches keep rolling off the line from that very same plant with no issue - in fact, all the new cab cars are quietly going into service with no media fanfare - because nobody cares when things go right.  And, 98% of the time, they go right.

(...)
And let me just reiterate something, because it seems to get lost a lot here (and in the news) - There is absolutely zero reason to believe that our trains are behind schedule, or will be behind schedule.  They have not started building them yet.  The issues around Flexity Outlook are resolved for TTC's order.

The Thunder Bay plant has four separate production lines.  So delays on one line (such as the one building the TTC streetcars) don't necessarily affect the other lines, as canard points out.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - taylortbb - 07-30-2015

(07-30-2015, 10:22 AM)Canard Wrote: And let me just reiterate something, because it seems to get lost a lot here (and in the news) - There is absolutely zero reason to believe that our trains are behind schedule, or will be behind schedule.  They have not started building them yet.  The issues around Flexity Outlook are resolved for TTC's order.

I wish that was true, but it's not. Just look at the comment from Metrolinx:

Quote:Provincial agency Metrolinx has confirmed that the first vehicles in its $770-million order are about a year behind on delivery. Originally expected late last year so Metrolinx could begin testing, they likely won’t arrive until this fall.

“Metrolinx is experiencing similar problems with the quality of light rail car frames assembled in Bombardier’s plant in Mexico,” the agency said on Wednesday.

Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/transportation/2015/05/13/ttc-issues-with-bombardier-streetcars-also-apply-to-metrolinx-order.html .

Fortunately for us there was a year of slack in the schedule, so it's not currently an issue for opening day. That doesn't mean that they're not behind schedule. You could argue they're not technically "our trains", but rather the prototypes for them, but if the prototype is behind schedule then the project is behind schedule.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 07-30-2015

That's not really true though, because we don't know where our 14 trains sat in Metrolinx' overall ECT+ion order.

Any time I have asked the team, the schedule was that the first of our trains would arrive in the fall of 2016, and that hasn't changed. Until I see an actual release from Bombardier, the Region or GrandLinq, I am firmly sticking with my belief that we are on-schedule and on budget. To think otherwise is damaging to the reputation of the project, I think. Imagine if Ouhitt scoured our forum and found all this speculation?

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - taylortbb - 07-30-2015

(07-30-2015, 11:58 AM)Canard Wrote: That's not really true though, because we don't know where our 14 trains sat in Metrolinx' overall ECT+ion order.

Any time I have asked the team, the schedule was that the first of our trains would arrive in the fall of 2016, and that hasn't changed. 

We're supposed to be getting the first production trains, as we have the earliest in service date of any of the projects in the Metrolinx order. There's actually an agreement between Metrolinx and the Region of Waterloo to do perform some of the initial acceptance testing for the entire order on the Waterloo spur. That's why the spur line tracks are so far ahead of the rest of the project, they need to be in service (electrified, etc) for late 2016 rather than 2017.

You're right that the delivery date hasn't changed, and that's what I meant by there's a year of slack in the schedule. But it's definitely concerning that the prototypes are a year late, and that Bombardier is having assembly issues with them. That's what I mean by they're not technically "our trains", only the prototypes for our trains. But they're still a key part of the order for our trains, and they're behind schedule.

Outhit already knows about this, and has talked about this. I'm not concerned about what he's going to write.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ookpik - 07-30-2015

(07-30-2015, 12:18 PM)taylortbb Wrote: Outhit already knows about this, and has talked about this. I'm not concerned about what he's going to write.
To each his own but I rely on Outhit for the opposite view of reality. If Jeff says it's black, then in reality it's usually white (or very light grey.)

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - chutten - 07-30-2015

(07-30-2015, 01:44 PM)ookpik Wrote:
(07-30-2015, 12:18 PM)taylortbb Wrote: Outhit already knows about this, and has talked about this. I'm not concerned about what he's going to write.
To each his own but I rely on Outhit for the opposite view of reality. If Jeff says it's black, then in reality it's usually white (or very light grey.)

I'm new here: who or what are Outhit and Jeff?

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 07-30-2015

(07-30-2015, 01:53 PM)chutten Wrote:
(07-30-2015, 01:44 PM)ookpik Wrote: To each his own but I rely on Outhit for the opposite view of reality. If Jeff says it's black, then in reality it's usually white (or very light grey.)

I'm new here: who or what are Outhit and Jeff?

Jeff Outhit, The Record's transportation writer:
http://www.therecord.com/waterlooregion-columnist/2677009-jeff-outhit