Waterloo Region Connected
General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 04-30-2016

(04-30-2016, 10:28 PM)GtwoK Wrote: On another note, I remember seeing a For Sale (and possibly a Sold?) sign on the South West corner of Weber Victoria. Anyone know any details, or which specific building was sold there? This intersection is ripe for some redevlopment, post grade separation.

That was the Fackoury Garage property, wasn't it?  I don't have the impression that anything will happen there soon.  I wondered when the sign went up whether the Working Centre/St John's Kitchen people might not be interested, but I suspect the price would be beyond their capacity.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 04-30-2016

(04-30-2016, 10:54 PM)BrianT Wrote:
(04-30-2016, 10:36 PM)panamaniac Wrote: That was the Fackoury Garage property, wasn't it?  I don't have the impression that anything will happen there soon.  I wondered when the sign went up whether the Working Centre/St John's Kitchen people might not be interested, but I suspect the price would be beyond their capacity.

I would guess that there are contamination issues to deal with on that property before any redevelopment could take place.....spills of petroleum products over the years.

Working Centre could possibly use it as an automotive shop or something similar, negating the need for redevelopment.

But I don't believe the property can be sold without the environmental mitigation being completed.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 04-30-2016

(04-30-2016, 10:58 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(04-30-2016, 10:54 PM)BrianT Wrote: I would guess that there are contamination issues to deal with on that property before any redevelopment could take place.....spills of petroleum products over the years.

Working Centre could possibly use it as an automotive shop or something similar, negating the need for redevelopment.

But I don't believe the property can be sold without the environmental mitigation being completed
.

That would surprise me.  I could see it if the building were to be demolished, but otherwise how would it even be physically possible?


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 04-30-2016

OK, checking ... and it can be sold (sorry about the mistake). Basically the "original" owner is responsible for cleanup. So if you buy a property without mitigation, you would need to then go after the seller to cover the mitigation expenses -- a pretty risky proposition. So few buyers are willing to buy a gas station (for example) without a proper environmental assessment and mitigation.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 04-30-2016

(04-30-2016, 11:08 PM)tomh009 Wrote: OK, checking ... and it can be sold (sorry about the mistake).  Basically the "original" owner is responsible for cleanup.  So if you buy a property without mitigation, you would need to then go after the seller to cover the mitigation expenses -- a pretty risky proposition.  So few buyers are willing to buy a gas station (for example) without a proper environmental assessment and mitigation.


So the fact that this property sold suggests that the assessment was done at some point.

Which reminds me - they were out drilling earlier this week beside the Huck Glove building on Victoria.  I wondered if that might be environmental in nature - I'm assuming that the Huck building could be next on the list of renovated factory spaces (with room on the site to incorporate new build).


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 05-01-2016

I don't think I've seen mention of it, but the Mennonite Building on Kent at Charles St has metal framework going up on the roof for what I assume will be a third floor. Surprising to see a substantial addition on such a new structure.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - rangersfan - 05-01-2016

Oh wow that is very surprising.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Lens - 05-01-2016

(05-01-2016, 06:05 PM)panamaniac Wrote: I don't think I've seen mention of it, but the Mennonite Building on Kent at Charles St has metal framework going up on the roof for what I assume will be a third floor.  Surprising to see a substantial addition on such a new structure.

I believe it's just a solar roof similar to this style 

[Image: 640px-Solar_Roof.JPG]


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 05-01-2016

(05-01-2016, 06:57 PM)Lens Wrote:
(05-01-2016, 06:05 PM)panamaniac Wrote: I don't think I've seen mention of it, but the Mennonite Building on Kent at Charles St has metal framework going up on the roof for what I assume will be a third floor.  Surprising to see a substantial addition on such a new structure.

I believe it's just a solar roof similar to this style 

[Image: 640px-Solar_Roof.JPG]

That's interesting - I wonder if there is a report or render available somewhere?


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - timio - 05-01-2016

Solar panels, not an additional floor. There are signs at the entrance off the parking lot.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - rangersfan - 05-01-2016

I just checked and there is a demolition permit (16-105534 DE) for 26 College St. Which must mean that this project has some momentum behind it or at least I hope it does.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Lens - 05-01-2016

(04-26-2016, 11:57 PM)Lens Wrote: Not sure if it was mentioned specifically but Manulife is putting some massive windows in on the third floor, Water st side of the building.

According to a sign on Joseph st. this is just the first of three phases of renovation. Next work will be done to the section north of Charles and then finally the King St. section wrapping up sometime in 2017


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - MacBerry - 05-01-2016

(04-30-2016, 11:08 PM)tomh009 Wrote: OK, checking ... and it can be sold (sorry about the mistake).  Basically the "original" owner is responsible for cleanup.  So if you buy a property without mitigation, you would need to then go after the seller to cover the mitigation expenses -- a pretty risky proposition.  So few buyers are willing to buy a gas station (for example) without a proper environmental assessment and mitigation.

This was a property owned by the Fackoury's way back into the 50s and may even still be owned by someone in the family. 

Texaco was the oil wholesaler who would have owned the tanks in the ground. Texaco became part of Chevron and Shell took over as the franchisor. Back in 1989, Imperial Esso became the owner of Texaco Canada. 

I think Fackoury stopped selling gasoline back in the 70's and so the remediation issue is likely a mess.


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 05-02-2016

So, spring is here and the former Mayfair site is sitting empty and unlandscaped, surrounded by chain link fence and with several City food kiosks stored on the pile of rocks. Nice to see the City and the private sector cooperating to create that Downtown vibe.... Sad


RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Rainrider22 - 05-02-2016

(05-02-2016, 12:26 PM)panamaniac Wrote: So, spring is here and the former Mayfair site is sitting empty and unlandscaped, surrounded by chain link fence and with several City food kiosks stored on the pile of rocks.  Nice to see the City and the private sector cooperating to create that Downtown vibe....  Sad

I noticed that too.  I am in awe that the city hasn't followed through with the owners to finish the site off. It is one thing that they agreed to rush the demolish in through, but to not ensure they area looks good. And seriously, a storage area for wooden sale huts !!!

I am going to call the mayors office and make a complaint.

They should at a minimum make a nice patio on the corner with some greens.  Great area to sit and take everything in.