ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - panamaniac - 10-11-2017 (10-11-2017, 07:26 PM)rangersfan Wrote: Also the article mentions a future redevelopment of the Sun life parking lot at King and Union St. Is this referring to the future development at King and John St? No, it's referring to the Sun Life parking lot at King and Union. (???) RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - panamaniac - 10-11-2017 (10-11-2017, 07:33 PM)jamincan Wrote: A zipper merge is not something that only happens where indicated. It is how all merges should work. People do it all the time with highway on-ramps with no issues. For some reason though, when a normal lane ends, people get into a queue mentality. I have found that zipper merges do seem to be used effectively on the Hwy 8-401 bridge. I agree and it's the way I usually try to merge, unless the lane I'm merging into is free of traffic. The other week on the 401 east of Kingston, however, I attempted to do so in a place where the two lanes were reduced to one due to construction. As I was proceeding toward the merge point, a woman pulled partly out of her lane to try to block me from passing and gave me the finger as I passed her (having had to move partly into the shoulder to avoid hitting her). The stretch of the Conestoga Parkway between University and Bridgeport Rd is renowned for that manoeuvre. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 10-11-2017 (10-11-2017, 07:01 PM)rangersfan Wrote: Article from the Kitchener Post on updates from the PARTS plan for the Midtown station area. Overall, I quite like the plan. That said, they could probably shift a bit more space from high-rise to mid-rise to assuage concerns. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 10-11-2017 (10-11-2017, 08:17 PM)panamaniac Wrote:(10-11-2017, 07:33 PM)jamincan Wrote: A zipper merge is not something that only happens where indicated. It is how all merges should work. People do it all the time with highway on-ramps with no issues. For some reason though, when a normal lane ends, people get into a queue mentality. I have found that zipper merges do seem to be used effectively on the Hwy 8-401 bridge. This makes a lot of sense. However, where feasible and in particular anywhere two lanes are reducing to one, the signage should be symmetrical to get people away from the idea that one lane is continuing on (and can just drive) while the other is stopping (and has to merge into the other lane). I think if explicitly-signed zipper merges were common in these situations, people would probably adopt an improved approach to on-ramp merges and other merges as well. (10-11-2017, 08:17 PM)panamaniac Wrote: I agree and it's the way I usually try to merge, unless the lane I'm merging into is free of traffic. The other week on the 401 east of Kingston, however, I attempted to do so in a place where the two lanes were reduced to one due to construction. As I was proceeding toward the merge point, a woman pulled partly out of her lane to try to block me from passing and gave me the finger as I passed her (having had to move partly into the shoulder to avoid hitting her). The stretch of the Conestoga Parkway between University and Bridgeport Rd is renowned for that manoeuvre. You were both right (well, I’m not really endorsing the rude gesture, but…read on!). She was correct that you were jumping the queue, and you were correct that the merge point should be, uh, at the merge point. What you’re missing is that the behaviour of the two lanes has to change at a certain point. Their speeds should match up, then the cars should adopt positions opposite gaps in the other lane, then the lanes should zip together. It is unreasonable to expect people who have spent time slowly advancing through a line to view favourably your proposal that they let you in after you zoom up past the whole line. That’s why I match speed with the line at a certain point, at the absolute latest the point where the merging lane mostly clears out, and then merge at the merge point. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 10-11-2017 I'd like to see an LRV merge onto our test track RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - SammyOES - 10-11-2017 (10-11-2017, 09:22 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: That’s why I match speed with the line at a certain point, at the absolute latest the point where the merging lane mostly clears out, and then merge at the merge point. Sadly this kills a number of the benefits of the zipper merge - it wastes a bunch of road capacity that could hold the queued cars and pushes the congestion back to the point that it impacts other roads/intersections that shouldn't need to be impacted. Not usually a problem on the 401, but horrible in the city. The other lady in the story wasn't right at all. She did something illegal. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 10-12-2017 (10-11-2017, 11:38 PM)SammyOES Wrote:(10-11-2017, 09:22 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: That’s why I match speed with the line at a certain point, at the absolute latest the point where the merging lane mostly clears out, and then merge at the merge point. The only reason it wastes road capacity is because not enough people are doing it. But even with not enough people doing it, my strategy avoids setting up a conflict between me and the people in the other lane. By contrast, the people who just drive up all the way are upsetting the people who are waiting. Additionally, depending on the exact speeds involved, the people who drive past the lineup may be creating an unsafe situation by having a high speed relative to the lane containing the lineup. Their speed also makes it so that anyone who tries to move from the lineup to the empty lane (doing their bit to use the wasted capacity) will have trouble due to needing to merge with sparser but faster traffic. By controlling the speed of traffic in the empty lane, I give people behind and in front of me the opportunity to use that lane. I would suggest that it should be illegal to go faster than maybe 10-15km/h faster than somebody in an adjacent lane. Of course this is harder to enforce than a regular speed limit but conceptually I’m quite confident it would be a good rule for safety. In particular, I’m suggesting that people should not be passing stopped traffic at high speed. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jwilliamson - 10-12-2017 Can the zipper merge discussion be moved to General Roads and Highway? RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Rainrider22 - 10-12-2017 Is this page for talk about LRT ? RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MidTowner - 10-12-2017 (10-11-2017, 08:29 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(10-11-2017, 07:01 PM)rangersfan Wrote: Article from the Kitchener Post on updates from the PARTS plan for the Midtown station area. There was considerable consultation for this. In addition to the usual feedback opportunities available at each step, and the public information centres set up, neighbours did things like host walks to discuss the different options and how they'd look on the ground, and bring info to neighbourhood events. I don't really understand the councillor's concerns about density. Much of the land is set aside for mid-rise, to "step down" from the taller buildings. I disagree with his comments about housing affordability- the way to increase affordability is to build more units, not fewer. Thinking about it, the headline of the article really irks me- the area has no "missing middle" in terms of density. It's almost entirely low-density now. Additionally, the planning area in question is small- outside of it, within a short walk or bike ride to the LRT, will continue to exist many single family homes for those who want them. I like the plan a lot. I really like the attention paid to green space in the proposed planning framework. I don't think the new or existing residents will be in want of parks if the plan is implemented as is. Re: the parking lot. It's referring to the parking lot at the south corner of King/Union, bounded by King, Union, Park and Mount Hope. That's a big lot. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - rangersfan - 10-12-2017 I thought that was what was being referred to but I didn't know how likely we were to see multiple redevelopments on the Sun Life property in the nearer term. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - urbd - 10-12-2017 Can we please get back on topic? Not only left turns now, but all sorts of merging options... even internationally. That would be better for the general road thread. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 10-12-2017 Mods, could you please relocate the non-LRT discussions to the appropriate threads (driving and downtown Kitchener)? Thanks! RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Markster - 10-12-2017 An article in the Kitchener Post commenting on the absurd station locations in Waterloo: https://www.kitchenerpost.ca/opinion-story/7605429-seemingly-designed-to-fail/ Quote:I had a dream that the LRT was up and running. I took the 202 iXpress from The Boardwalk to the University Avenue LRT station, a transit hub occupying part of what had been UW parking lot A. Walking a few metres to the LRT, I saw students boarding the waiting GO, Greyhound, and GRT buses. And there's a bit more after that you can read at the link. It's certainly not wrong about how the locations for stations are woefully poorly placed from a connectivity perspective. TriTAG was already harping on this point in 2012, back when there was the slim possibility of getting things changed, but political buy-in from the universities seemed pegged to the absurd station locations. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 10-12-2017 (10-12-2017, 10:22 AM)Markster Wrote: An article in the Kitchener Post commenting on the absurd station locations in Waterloo: To play a very tiny amount of devils advocate. The station locations are probably better for those who aren't on connecting buses. I.e., visiting the park is easier with the location of the park station, and visiting campus, or getting on the train from living nearby (Phillip St., and hopefully with a connector through to Hickory and Lester). Still, network wise, it seems like a bad choice. It *could* be mitigated if the region/GRT/University was willing to put up the cash and land and political will to build direct access roads, with full transit priority instead of meandering down Ring Rd. But that isn't going to happen either. |