ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 09-20-2017 (09-19-2017, 09:09 PM)Canard Wrote: Different flatbed for TTC (1495 mm vs. 1435 mm). Do you know that for a fact, or do you assume from the different gauge that it is a different flatbed? My assumption (which however is not based on actual knowledge) is that the flatbed would be able to be changed between the two gauges by changing the mounting points for the rail segments (which if I am interpreting correctly what I saw in photos are not actually rail segments as such but rather square tubes). However, I looked up some photos and the Ion vehicle was delivered on JTTX 157639 and at least one of Toronto's streetcars on (some number might be wrong, but enough to see the number is definitely different) JTTX 158091. So they definitely have at least two flatcars used for this purpose. It still raises the question of how easy it is to re-gauge the flatcar: do they have to re-weld stuff, or can they shift the rail pieces for a particular delivery? http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=23899 https://www.flickr.com/photos/130597773@N05/32289696924/ RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 09-20-2017 Where did the 80km/h testing claim come from? Certain Facebook personalities are having a hard time accepting it actually happened. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 09-20-2017 (09-20-2017, 08:43 AM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Where did the 80km/h testing claim come from? Certain Facebook personalities are having a hard time accepting it actually happened. Is there doubt about the speed or are people just not believing Bombardier actually can make working vehicles? Just curious… RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - urbd - 09-20-2017 (09-19-2017, 10:58 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: I saw them installing these curb and reflective pieces today on both sides of King where the spur line rail crosses. I guess it is to try and stop people from driving/walking/cycling along the rails? Incorrect. The Region sees this portion of rail as the unofficial connection from the Spur Line Trail to the Laurel Trail (that's why it is paved now), so walking and cycling along the rails won't be prevented or discouraged during the day. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinT - 09-20-2017 (09-20-2017, 07:46 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: However, I looked up some photos and the Ion vehicle was delivered on JTTX 157639 and at least one of Toronto's streetcars on (some number might be wrong, but enough to see the number is definitely different) JTTX 158091. So they definitely have at least two flatcars used for this purpose. According to this post on UrbanToronto there are three transporters for the TTC cars. Given that there are 7 cars due to ship for the TTC next month (when the second line in Thunder Bay starts to deliver), I would assume that there is at least one dedicated car for Ion that's independent of the other three. They're a relatively simple modification of a standard TTX flatcar, so I wouldn't see any need to make a dual-gauge transporter that gets kicked back and forth between Kingston and Thunder Bay. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 09-20-2017 (09-20-2017, 07:46 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: Do you know that for a fact, or do you assume from the different gauge that it is a different flatbed? I'll have to look back through my photos, but I recall distinctly thinking about this during the offloading in February, and deciding in my head that it was very much a "fixed" design - not flexible in the standpoint that the "rails" could be adjusted. I don't track train car numbers or anything, so I'll leave it to the experts to decide if there are more than one. I just couldn't really justify reasonably in my head that there would be, or would need to be. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Markster - 09-20-2017 (09-20-2017, 11:48 AM)Canard Wrote: I'll have to look back through my photos, but I recall distinctly thinking about this during the offloading in February, and deciding in my head that it was very much a "fixed" design - not flexible in the standpoint that the "rails" could be adjusted. And to add to this, TTC guage and standard guage are so close, that it's not possible to build a dual guage flatbed, without staggering them full gauntlet-track style. And I suspect that the tracks must be centred on the bed, ruling out the gauntlet option. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 09-20-2017 Hrm, I always forget that. At HCRY, I think I talked to them about this and they said the 60 mm was so insignificant for "fat" tram wheels it didn't really matter there, and they could (carefully) run equipment on the wider stance. That could very well be the case here, too - great observation. LRV's have much wider wheels than typical rail vehicles, which also makes it more tolerant to a wider gauge. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 09-20-2017 (09-20-2017, 10:11 AM)urbd Wrote:(09-19-2017, 10:58 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: I saw them installing these curb and reflective pieces today on both sides of King where the spur line rail crosses. I guess it is to try and stop people from driving/walking/cycling along the rails? That may be true between King and Regina, but between King and Caroline the designated route is south of the Ion rails on the brand new MUT that looks like a wide sidewalk. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 09-20-2017 Yeah, I was just about to ask. That post was the first I'd ever heard about any official word either way on what the deal was with the "paved" section of tracks there. It's very confusing as to what is "allowed" and what isn't. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - trainspotter139 - 09-20-2017 (09-19-2017, 10:48 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: I agree that for the number of trains that need to be delivered on a regular basis at the moment they only need flatbed is needed one. After the ION order that won't necessarily be true. there are a lot of vehicles that need to be delivered for Metrolinx in a short period of time and the Edmonton order goes a much longer distance than here or Toronto so only having 1 makes absolutely no sense to me. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 09-20-2017 (09-20-2017, 10:11 AM)urbd Wrote:(09-19-2017, 10:58 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: I saw them installing these curb and reflective pieces today on both sides of King where the spur line rail crosses. I guess it is to try and stop people from driving/walking/cycling along the rails? Unofficial? The Laurel trail runs down parallel to the track through Waterloo Park, across Erb and Caroline, then parallel to the track to King, between the buildings to Regina, then next to the track until it crosses the creek (where it meets the Spur Line trail), and continues north parallel to the creek. Furthermore it has done so for many years. Check the City trail map. The space between the buildings has had snow cleared during the winter for at least the last several years. I don’t think there is anything unofficial about it. That’s part of why I think the detailed design through the mall parking lot is such a screw-up. There is no obvious sign the designers even understood there is a trail going through there. To be fair, that was already true the last time it got a minor re-design a few years ago and they replaced part of what I think was supposed to be the trail with plants. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Coke6pk - 09-20-2017 (09-19-2017, 01:49 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(09-19-2017, 01:24 PM)Canard Wrote: No ultra-circuitous route this time, eh? Taking the VIA to Ottawa on Monday.... hopefully I pass by Train #2 for that advance peek! Coke RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - GtwoK - 09-20-2017 (09-19-2017, 10:58 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: The placement of this crossing at just north of Father David Bauer at Caroline will forever be horrible, but at least they are making VERY slow progress on fixing the lack of curb cuts. First they painted the place to cut the curb. A few months later they cut the curb. A few months later they have removed the dirt and are preparing a to frame the space for a concrete pour: Thank GOD. So sick of seeing this: Why is the freight portion of this so wide, anyway? Or paved, for that matter? Freight doesnt need that much room, and people doing this wouldn't have been possible if they had made the freight ROW just as wide as the LRT ROW RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 09-20-2017 (09-20-2017, 04:28 PM)GtwoK Wrote: Thank GOD. So sick of seeing this: Sorry, I just... why are you so sick of seeing that? I mean, I don't like seeing people break the rules, either, but... the rules are absolutely not clear here. There is no signage there, at all. For all we know, this could be a perfectly allowed manoeuvre! The only sign in the area is off of King, which is a massive "NO TRESSPASSING" sign. Which everyone (cars, pedestrians, and cyclists) all ignore. |