ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - nms - 05-11-2017 Thanks for the Waterloo Park thoughts. After I made my post, I reviewed the multiple Waterloo Park map plans that I could find (though somehow I missed the one linked above). I generally concluded that my problem was that the current track configuration is anticipating a park trail layout that has yet to be built. It would have been nice to have an east-west crossing that did not require going out of the way of the path of travel simply to connect to the LRT platform. 100m can be a long way, especially when you have short legs! RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 05-11-2017 Quite the hole at Queen and Charles! No sign of work on the problematic narrow corner yet. Also, I think I saw out of the corner of my eye while I was driving through William at King, that the trees were being planted in Uptown Waterloo. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 05-11-2017 (05-11-2017, 07:53 AM)Pheidippides Wrote: Quite the hole at Queen and Charles! Look a little way down Charles and you can see the large pieces of underground sewerage infrastructure that will inhabit it. Not sure why those weren't put in last year. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - urbd - 05-11-2017 (05-11-2017, 07:53 AM)Pheidippides Wrote: Also, I think I saw out of the corner of my eye while I was driving through William at King, that the trees were being planted in Uptown Waterloo. You are correct. Looks great! I can't wait for this finished streetscape (benches, etc)... the extra wide sidewalks on both sides are a great addition to Uptown. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 05-11-2017 Would I be just a little negative if I said I kind of wished a portion of that super-wide sidewalk could have been somehow re-aligned as an MUT or bike lanes? Like, protected ones, even? It would have been so cool to somehow dovetail that in with the work going on just North of the tracks in upTown. The overall effect of traffic is pretty calm through here now, anyway, so riding on the road isn't that scary, but it "would have been nice". We do have that super nice MUT on Caroline, though! RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 05-11-2017 Given that there is a super nice MUT on a parallel street just a block away, I think it's reasonable to make King St S a pedestrian-friendly environment -- maybe even with some patios, is that too much to hope for? RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 05-11-2017 (05-11-2017, 12:11 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Given that there is a super nice MUT on a parallel street just a block away, I think it's reasonable to make King St S a pedestrian-friendly environment -- maybe even with some patios, is that too much to hope for? Given that there are super nice car lanes on a parallel street just a block way, I think it’s reasonable to make King St S a no-cars zone. What is with this idea that provision for bikes is only needed here and there, rather than on every street? It’s bizarre (I do agree that only some streets need infrastructure for full-speed bicycling). Seriously, though, if it were up to me I would make King St. one car lane southbound and use the extra lane freed up by eliminating northbound traffic to create a really high-quality two-way bicycle route. Regina St. would be one car lane northbound (and presumably bidirectional bike lanes as well). RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 05-11-2017 I guess pedestrians don't matter, only bicyclists do. Sigh. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Elmira Guy - 05-11-2017 /\ Exactly what I was thinking. Or at very least they are considered to be at the bottom of the hierarchy by many here. I'm all for bike lanes, but why should pedestrians be considered the least important when it comes to space to travel? I would also be in favour of making the section of King from Erb to William a car-free area. LRT, pedestrians and cyclists only. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - mpd618 - 05-11-2017 (05-11-2017, 11:33 AM)Canard Wrote: Would I be just a little negative if I said I kind of wished a portion of that super-wide sidewalk could have been somehow re-aligned as an MUT or bike lanes? Like, protected ones, even? The Rapid Transit team cared essentially zero about cycling, and King Street uptown and especially midtown is the unfortunate result. Yes, they could have done much better. I hope that future transit infrastructure projects in the Region are not as siloed as that project was. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Andy - 05-11-2017 Personally, I would not use a MUT on king street here. There is too much going on (parking, cars, train, pedestrians, other cyclists) that it seems safer to just ride on the road where you will have more space. MUTs are attractive (to me) when there are high car speeds, limited pedestrians, and limited driveways/crossings. I think expanding the sidewalk for pedestrians was better served. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - timc - 05-11-2017 (05-11-2017, 01:08 PM)mpd618 Wrote: The Rapid Transit team cared essentially zero about cycling, and King Street uptown and especially midtown is the unfortunate result. Yes, they could have done much better. I hope that future transit infrastructure projects in the Region are not as siloed as that project was. Although I don't go that way often, I'm not looking forward to cycling on King Street near the hospital. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MacBerry - 05-12-2017 A quick primer on the next possible LRT vehicles that may come to #Waterloo Region in Phase 2 development. #Metrolinx moves their next piece on the #LRT chessboard and says "check" #Bombardier Coming Soon to Ottawa #LRT - Alstom's Citadis Spirit RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 05-12-2017 There was room on King for bike lane from Erb to William or further south, but there was a greater "need" for on-street parking that was lost to the LRT and streetscape work. At the time of the LRT planning I don't think the cycle lanes from north of Erb were planned for, and definitely not planned, until the very last minute, to meet the spurline. It actually wouldn't take that much re-work to re-purpose those on-street spaces along the east side between Willis and William. Just saw through and scoop out the the curb bump-outs and repave. :-) RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Markster - 05-12-2017 (05-12-2017, 07:27 AM)MacBerry Wrote: A quick primer on the next possible LRT vehicles that may come to #Waterloo Region in Phase 2 development. #Metrolinx moves their next piece on the #LRT chessboard and says "check" #Bombardier Our fleet is so small, that there's no way they'll go with another manufacturer for phase 2. Bombardier would have to literally be out of business. There are just too many efficiencies to be had with buying more Felxities. And, we need few enough vehicles, that Bombardier, even at their lethargic pace, can still make them in a reasonable time! |