Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - embe - 01-05-2017

(01-04-2017, 09:09 PM)Canard Wrote:
(01-04-2017, 08:06 PM)BrianT Wrote: The signs have to say 'no stopping' which encompasses all possibilities including 'no parking'.  If there is 'no stopping', then obviously there is 'no parking' either. The 'no stopping' is the most strict of all the prohibitions when you think of it.

Makes sense that you shouldn't stop on the tracks, but let's say an ambulance/cop/firetruck is making way behind you with sirens lights and the whole shebang?   Do you yield to the right in this case with tracks at grade level?  . 

I can see joggers and cyclists using that path, even drivers. 

Especially drivers when visibility is the way it's been the last couple days, might look like an open lane when covered in snow/slush


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-05-2017

(01-05-2017, 09:56 PM)embe Wrote: Makes sense that you shouldn't stop on the tracks, but let's say an ambulance/cop/firetruck is making way behind you with sirens lights and the whole shebang?   Do you yield to the right in this case with tracks at grade level?  . 

That's a great question. It's a situation that could come up on Borden, Ottawa, King (between Allen and Erb) and Caroline (between Erb and Allen).

I imagine that in those situations, trains would probably slow down significantly (if not stop), with the expectation that there might be a lot of people confused about what to do and be mounting up onto the rapidway over the shallow curbs.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-05-2017

(01-05-2017, 08:06 PM)clasher Wrote: If it was an active construction zone it should be barricaded off.

So is what we're saying here is that it's not okay for cars to park on the (currently) unused rapidway because it develops bad habits, but it is okay for joggers and cyclists to run on it, since they're somehow immune to developing those very same bad habits?


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 01-05-2017

I believe what is being said is that there's lots of parking available, even if not right at the Tannery, just across the street, so there is no need beyond a short walk and free parking to park on the rapidway. On the other hand, when there are no sidewalks, because they're ripped up and under construction, it is far more understandable that someone might walk there. Context does matter.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - SammyOES2 - 01-05-2017

(01-05-2017, 10:26 PM)Canard Wrote: So is what we're saying here is that it's not okay for cars to park on the (currently) unused rapidway because it develops bad habits, but it is okay for joggers and cyclists to run on it, since they're somehow immune to developing those very same bad habits?

Lol, yup.  Although I honestly don't really get what the big deal is in either case.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 01-06-2017

(01-05-2017, 10:26 PM)Canard Wrote:
(01-05-2017, 08:06 PM)clasher Wrote: If it was an active construction zone it should be barricaded off.

So is what we're saying here is that it's not okay for cars to park on the (currently) unused rapidway because it develops bad habits, but it is okay for joggers and cyclists to run on it, since they're somehow immune to developing those very same bad habits?

To be fair, you said it was an active construction zone, which appears not to be the case — it’s a completed section of rapidway which is no longer under construction and not yet in use. Also, somehow I feel that active transportation users are less likely to develop bad habits than car drivers. There is something about not being protected by a steel cage that at least in some people focusses the mind.

Having said that, I’m certainly not going to develop a habit of using the tracks in that way, although I might take one trip like that “while I can”.

Also, parking causes a problem for the entire duration of the parking and may require a tow to resolve. All other proposed uses can cease at any instant when a train comes along.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-06-2017

(01-06-2017, 06:42 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: Also, somehow I feel that active transportation users are less likely to develop bad habits than car drivers. There is something about not being protected by a steel cage that at least in some people focusses the mind.

I... I don't even know how to respond to that.  Wow.  Confused I totally disagree. There are good drivers and bad drivers. There are good cyclists and bad cyclists. There are good pedestrians and bad pedestrians. Unless you want to start quoting data and do a study, your statement doesn't fly.

Quote:Also, parking causing a problem for the entire duration of the parking and may require a tow to resolve. All other proposed uses can cease at any instant when a train comes along.

Yep, they cease instantly when a train comes along, and it hits them and kills them, because they had their headphones in or were texting and not paying attention.  I'm just curious, and I think I know the answer, but do you guys actually have any clue how many fatalities there are per year on LRT systems in the US?  I'm getting the feeling that this is something very few are actually aware of, and are going to be in for a very rude awakening once service starts.

Have a look at this...




RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - plam - 01-06-2017

(01-06-2017, 08:03 AM)Canard Wrote:
(01-06-2017, 06:42 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: Also, somehow I feel that active transportation users are less likely to develop bad habits than car drivers. There is something about not being protected by a steel cage that at least in some people focusses the mind.

I... I don't even know how to respond to that.  Wow.  Confused  I totally disagree.  There are good drivers and bad drivers.  There are good cyclists and bad cyclists.  There are good pedestrians and bad pedestrians.  Unless you want to start quoting data and do a study, your statement doesn't fly.

Quote:Also, parking causing a problem for the entire duration of the parking and may require a tow to resolve. All other proposed uses can cease at any instant when a train comes along.

Yep, they cease instantly when a train comes along, and it hits them and kills them, because they had their headphones in or were texting and not paying attention.  I'm just curious, and I think I know the answer, but do you guys actually have any clue how many fatalities there are per year on LRT systems in the US?  I'm getting the feeling that this is something very few are actually aware of, and are going to be in for a very rude awakening once service starts.

Perhaps less than would be killed by cars?

We're not in Thailand:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRVaGV47C8I


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Viewfromthe42 - 01-06-2017

Fundamentally, no one should be on the rapidway, except in designated crossing areas at permissible crossing times.

We accept that there may be some bending of this, with the example given for cars or emergency vehicles to squeeze onto the rapidway to help emergency vehicles get to their destinations more quickly.

I will probably accept that a careful, considerate pedestrian/cyclist should be able to cross in other locations, only when absolutely clear that it is safe to do so. I understand that the experiences of others will never allow themselves to do this, nor to be comfortable with anyone else doing it.

Parking on the tracks will never be acceptable, and is not a good stand-in for pedestrians crossing the tracks. Leaving a permanent obstacle on the tracks is different than a person being on the tracks and immediately able to move off. Even a car using it as a turning lane can't magically hop onto the sidewalk the way a pedestrian or cyclist can (and a driver going on the rapidway, especially if in the wrong direction, adds an unexpected situation for others to recognize and be endangered by, just like a car driving down the Iron Horse Trail).


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - chutten - 01-06-2017

(01-06-2017, 08:03 AM)Canard Wrote: I'm just curious, and I think I know the answer, but do you guys actually have any clue how many fatalities there are per year on LRT systems in the US?

There were 40 in 2012. More recent figures are preliminary (yes, this is from the 2016 report. No, I don't know why their information products are so out of date) but say 33 for 2013 and 39 for 2014.

Probably safe to say: Some tens of humans are killed in the US by light rail each year.

Yes, the lives saved by more efficient transport; Yes, the economic benefit of a transit system; Yes, the order of magnitude difference in fatalities compared to automotive transport (disputed, I don't have a source for this. Someone will need to find the # of passenger miles attributed to both modes for normalization); Yes the knock-on benefits to environment, urban intensification...

But. Those are still fatalities, those are still people who die, and those are going to happen to our system in our lifetimes and possibly to someone we know. And it will be used to vilify the system, the operators, the riders, and the supporters.

Are there are steps Grandlinq and the Region could be taking today to minimize these deaths? Are there steps _we_ can take?


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-06-2017

I hope we'll know more soon (next week?). I understand they're preparing to launch their safety campaign in the next week or two - I've reached out for more information.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - timio - 01-06-2017

The RT team posted a notice in their Facebook page linking to regional press release.


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-06-2017

Yay, finally!! Here are the details: http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/News/index.aspx?newsId=97b3e80e-b6d6-48fa-a91c-d718ccced754




RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - panamaniac - 01-06-2017

(01-06-2017, 11:11 AM)chutten Wrote:
(01-06-2017, 08:03 AM)Canard Wrote: I'm just curious, and I think I know the answer, but do you guys actually have any clue how many fatalities there are per year on LRT systems in the US?

There were 40 in 2012. More recent figures are preliminary (yes, this is from the 2016 report. No, I don't know why their information products are so out of date) but say 33 for 2013 and 39 for 2014.

Probably safe to say: Some tens of humans are killed in the US by light rail each year.

Yes, the lives saved by more efficient transport; Yes, the economic benefit of a transit system; Yes, the order of magnitude difference in fatalities compared to automotive transport (disputed, I don't have a source for this. Someone will need to find the # of passenger miles attributed to both modes for normalization); Yes the knock-on benefits to environment, urban intensification...

But. Those are still fatalities, those are still people who die, and those are going to happen to our system in our lifetimes and possibly to someone we know. And it will be used to vilify the system, the operators, the riders, and the supporters.

Are there are steps Grandlinq and the Region could be taking today to minimize these deaths? Are there steps _we_ can take?

Does the U.S. information indicate how many of those fatalities were considered to be suicides?


RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-06-2017

So, here's the deal: Over the next few weeks, temporary "targeted" signage is going up in places where the parking on the rapidway is "chronic", to help get the word out. This will give people one final chance to "break the habit" before ticketing and towing begins. The media over the next few days will be running pieces on this as well, so there are no surprises.

Safety campaign is coming soon, starting in the next month or so.