Cycling in Waterloo Region - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Cycling in Waterloo Region (/showthread.php?tid=186) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
|
RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - timc - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 03:58 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: The problem with bike boxes in my mind, is that they are designed around vehicular cycling. They only work for cyclists who are comfortable taking a lane, and riding in front of a line of traffic. As a vehicular cyclist, I find that it is easier to take the lane with cars than it is to use a bike box. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 04:07 PM)Elmira Guy Wrote: Good. I was wondering exactly what a bike box was, and how it was used. Thanks for the explanation. Nope, the intent is that a cyclist may come up and occupy the box at any time during the red signal. I have *heard* city staff suggest that right turns on red are also not permitted when there is a bike box, but given there is no signage, education, or any other other way for anyone to know this, it's the "tree in a forest with nobody to hear it" equivalent of a rule, so realistically, I would consider this the exception. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 04:23 PM)timc Wrote:(11-04-2016, 03:58 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: The problem with bike boxes in my mind, is that they are designed around vehicular cycling. They only work for cyclists who are comfortable taking a lane, and riding in front of a line of traffic. I'm not sure what you mean? I see using the bike box as part of taking the lane. For example, when turning left, the bike box allows you to enter the left turn lane, when it might be difficult to do so due to a line of traffic blocking you between the bike lane and the left turn lane. Or when a bike lane ends at a signalized intersection with a red, it is far safer to enter the box and move in front of the remaining through lane, than trying to merge with accelerating traffic when the light turns green. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Canard - 11-04-2016 I have a feeling this is not going to illicit a very popular reaction.
RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - timc - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 04:46 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(11-04-2016, 04:23 PM)timc Wrote: As a vehicular cyclist, I find that it is easier to take the lane with cars than it is to use a bike box. I mean that if I want to turn left, I will move to the left turn lane before I get to the intersection. I find that easier than trying to use a bike box, likely because drivers don't understand how to drive around bike boxes. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 04:46 PM)Canard Wrote: I have a feeling this is not going to illicit a very popular reaction. Your feeling is correct, I was rather bothered by that sign. I am *hoping* it is temporary during the construction. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 04:51 PM)timc Wrote: I mean that if I want to turn left, I will move to the left turn lane before I get to the intersection. I find that easier than trying to use a bike box, likely because drivers don't understand how to drive around bike boxes. I find it very much depends on the intersection and conditions, on some roads, if its a quite day with little traffic, moving into the left turn lane is easy, on other roads, say, Fischer-Hallman near rush hour, I'm not so comfortable moving across 2 lanes of 90km/h traffic. Other roads like University, there may be an enormous queue of through traffic blocking me access from the left turn lane. So it very much depends on the conditions. I actually find them most useful when the bike lane ends. I *hate* roads where the bike lane disappears through an intersection (I'm looking at you Glasgow). I actually use the 'Bike box' style of left turn sometimes even when there is no bike box if the conditions are as above, I'll cut in front of cars in the left turn lane. The biggest problem, with both that, and the bike boxes, is cars turning left or right from the other road may think you are crossing the entire intersection. Much like most new traffic devices, it will take some getting used too. But this one, maybe we can just skip. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - kps - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 03:58 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: They only work for cyclists who are comfortable taking a lane, and riding in front of a line of traffic. Most cyclists are not comfortable with this, and worse, many drivers seem to not accept it either. Makes sense, since it's illegal, although it's part of the 99% of the Highway Traffic Act that's never enforced. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - timc - 11-04-2016 Unless you're in a bike box, if you are making a left turn, you should be in the left turn lane. It's also in the HTA (section 154). RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 05:18 PM)kps Wrote:(11-04-2016, 03:58 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: They only work for cyclists who are comfortable taking a lane, and riding in front of a line of traffic. Most cyclists are not comfortable with this, and worse, many drivers seem to not accept it either. I'm not sure what exactly you're referring to here, but you are 100% incorrect on this. Cyclists are permitted to take the lane as necessary. First, the turnout law doesn't apply to the circumstances I'm discussing. You probably mean to link to the "slow moving vehicles (including bicycles) must keep right as practicable". But that word practicable has a very specific meaning, and I will refer you to the MTO's cycling skills guide which gives explicit instructions for cyclists: "Where do you ride? Because bicycles usually travel at a lower speed, there are two rules of the road to which cyclists must pay special attention: 1. slower traffic stays right 2. slower traffic must give way to faster traffic when safe and practical Accordingly, cyclists should ride one meter from the curb or close to the right hand edge of the road when there is no curb, unless they are turning left, going faster than other vehicles or if the lane is too narrow to share." Source: http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/safety/pdfs/cycling-skills.pdf So, cyclists may take the lane if the lane is too narrow to share with a car, or should ride one meter out from the curb. On most lanes in our city 1 meter out from the curb is effectively taking the lane. This is the government's document recommending specific cyclist behaviour. Later, the same document repeats it: "Taking a lane In urban areas where a curb lane is too narrow to share safely with a motorist, it is legal to take the whole lane by riding in the centre of it. " Taking the lane is entirely legal in Ontario if the lanes are not wide enough to share with a car, which is almost all lanes, except for extra wide parking lanes. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - Pheidippides - 11-04-2016 Nice to be able to see the bike lanes on the pavement along Margaret again (they had faded considerably). I only saw them while on the #8 so hard to know if some of the oddities have been corrected yet. The driving lanes on Margaret seem narrower though; so much so that the #8 was straddling the bike lane by a good margin. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 06:28 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: Nice to be able to see the bike lanes on the pavement along Margaret again (they had faded considerably). I only saw them while on the #8 so hard to know if some of the oddities have been corrected yet. The driving lanes on Margaret seem narrower though; so much so that the #8 was straddling the bike lane by a good margin. That was the "shave and pave" that was planned, should also lead to a smoother ride. I know they had planned to correct some oddities around the pedestrian island, but it didn't look like they'd rebuild either the curb or the island so I have no idea if that happened or not. The narrowness of the lanes is a problem on some streets, buses on Highland do the same thing, but it *should* slow traffic down. Of course, traffic rides on the line enough it disappears and then we go back to 4.5 meter wide lanes. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - kps - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 06:09 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(11-04-2016, 05:18 PM)kps Wrote: Makes sense, since it's illegal, although it's part of the 99% of the Highway Traffic Act that's never enforced. The link (which works, though the file is large, so perhaps your browser can't cope) is to §148(6): Quote:(6) Every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle or equestrian travelling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle or equestrian to pass and the vehicle or equestrian overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 148 (6). I don't see anything in the Highway Traffic Act that says that's optional; please point out the section that makes it “100% incorrect”. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - danbrotherston - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 06:50 PM)kps Wrote:(11-04-2016, 06:09 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I'm not sure what exactly you're referring to here, but you are 100% incorrect on this. Cyclists are permitted to take the lane as necessary. I am aware what section you linked too. That section doesn't apply to our discussion. A "turnout" is a specific piece of roadway giving a place for traffic to pull into to allow vehicles behind to overtake. It doesn't apply to driving down a straight urban roadway. This in no way precludes taking the lane on an urban road, it simply means, if there is a turnout, you must use it. There aren't turnouts on city streets. I don't think the MTO's book can be any clearer. "In urban areas where a curb lane is too narrow to share safely with a motorist, it is legal to take the whole lane by riding in the centre of it." This is a government document giving instructions for cycling in the city. It *is* the rules. It cannot be clearer. Taking the lane is legal. RE: Cycling in Waterloo Region - kps - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 07:06 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I am aware what section you linked too. That section doesn't apply to our discussion. A "turnout" is a specific piece of roadway giving a place for traffic to pull into to allow vehicles behind to overtake. It doesn't apply to driving down a straight urban roadway.The phrase is “turn out” (verb, meaning ‘move out of the way’), not “turnout” (noun). §148 is precisely the part of the Highway Traffic Act concerned with meeting and overtaking; if you want to point out a different section, here is the whole thing again. |