+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - nms - 07-10-2024
Joel Rubinoff wrote a column about the state of downtown Kitchener. Various locals were interviewed included the owner of the Yeti Café, A Second Look Books as well as former Mayor Carl Zehr and The Museum's David Marskell. The article has a teased image of dream that David Marskell has for 44 Gaukel. If he can pull it off, it would definitely be a placemaker.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 07-10-2024
(07-10-2024, 09:44 PM)nms Wrote: Joel Rubinoff wrote a column about the state of downtown Kitchener. Various locals were interviewed included the owner of the Yeti Café, A Second Look Books as well as former Mayor Carl Zehr and The Museum's David Marskell. The article has a teased image of dream that David Marskell has for 44 Gaukel. If he can pull it off, it would definitely be a placemaker.
With due respect to Marskell, he cannot pull it off. The real question is whether themuseum can survive.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Acitta - 07-10-2024
(07-10-2024, 09:50 PM)panamaniac Wrote:(07-10-2024, 09:44 PM)nms Wrote: Joel Rubinoff wrote a column about the state of downtown Kitchener. Various locals were interviewed included the owner of the Yeti Café, A Second Look Books as well as former Mayor Carl Zehr and The Museum's David Marskell. The article has a teased image of dream that David Marskell has for 44 Gaukel. If he can pull it off, it would definitely be a placemaker.
With due respect to Marskell, he cannot pull it off. The real question is whether themuseum can survive.
It would be nice to see a building like that downtown, but who is going to finance it? There is a whole row of new retail units in the centre block that are empty. Maybe if they had tenants, more people would venture out of their condos to shop there.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Vojnik_Vahaj - 07-11-2024
(07-10-2024, 10:56 PM)Acitta Wrote:(07-10-2024, 09:50 PM)panamaniac Wrote: With due respect to Marskell, he cannot pull it off. The real question is whether themuseum can survive.
It would be nice to see a building like that downtown, but who is going to finance it? There is a whole row of new retail units in the centre block that are empty. Maybe if they had tenants, more people would venture out of their condos to shop there.
It always sad for me to see local businesses in uptown or downtown close and the space remains empty
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 07-11-2024
(07-11-2024, 08:05 AM)Vojnik_Vahaj Wrote:(07-10-2024, 10:56 PM)Acitta Wrote: There is a whole row of new retail units in the centre block that are empty. Maybe if they had tenants, more people would venture out of their condos to shop there.
It always sad for me to see local businesses in uptown or downtown close and the space remains empty
I think Acitta is referring to the row of King Street-facing retail units in the Young Condos development that have never yet had tenants. As other businesses have opened in other King St W locations since then, I do expect that these particular retail units are priced too high to attract new retail tenants.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 07-11-2024
(07-11-2024, 08:39 AM)tomh009 Wrote:(07-11-2024, 08:05 AM)Vojnik_Vahaj Wrote: It always sad for me to see local businesses in uptown or downtown close and the space remains empty
I think Acitta is referring to the row of King Street-facing retail units in the Young Condos development that have never yet had tenants. As other businesses have opened in other King St W locations since then, I do expect that these particular retail units are priced too high to attract new retail tenants.
A common problem of new mixed use developments, istm. These could be sitting empty for years.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - bravado - 07-11-2024
I still don’t understand how commercial landlords can stay in business doing things like that. There is a relatively fixed amount of entrepreneurial people and commercial rent has always seemed hilariously out of touch with reality.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - taylortbb - 07-11-2024
(07-11-2024, 01:51 PM)bravado Wrote: I still don’t understand how commercial landlords can stay in business doing things like that. There is a relatively fixed amount of entrepreneurial people and commercial rent has always seemed hilariously out of touch with reality.
See https://www.reddit.com/r/boston/comments/11fnqtq/why_do_commercial_landlords_prefer_to_keep_spaces/
Commercial buildings are valued based on rent, so it's preferable to leave it vacant as then it gets valued based on theoretical rent rather than lower actual rent. It's less about the carrying costs, and more about the resale value.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - bravado - 07-11-2024
Ah I get it, well that helps me sleep at night knowing that bullshit financialization of everything means that I don't get a vibrant downtown and space for local entrepreneurs
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 07-11-2024
(07-11-2024, 01:51 PM)bravado Wrote: I still don’t understand how commercial landlords can stay in business doing things like that. There is a relatively fixed amount of entrepreneurial people and commercial rent has always seemed hilariously out of touch with reality.
It's either the developer sitting on unsold retail condo units--or the condo corporation dealing with the operation costs of the units with no rental income to make up for that. But if it were the latter case, I expect that the condo corp would drop the rent in order to attract tenants.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - panamaniac - 07-12-2024
(07-11-2024, 10:12 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(07-11-2024, 01:51 PM)bravado Wrote: I still don’t understand how commercial landlords can stay in business doing things like that. There is a relatively fixed amount of entrepreneurial people and commercial rent has always seemed hilariously out of touch with reality.
It's either the developer sitting on unsold retail condo units--or the condo corporation dealing with the operation costs of the units with no rental income to make up for that. But if it were the latter case, I expect that the condo corp would drop the rent in order to attract tenants.
Are there residential condo corps that are responsible for attached commercial units? I'd run like hell ...
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - taylortbb - 07-13-2024
(07-11-2024, 10:12 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(07-11-2024, 01:51 PM)bravado Wrote: I still don’t understand how commercial landlords can stay in business doing things like that. There is a relatively fixed amount of entrepreneurial people and commercial rent has always seemed hilariously out of touch with reality.
It's either the developer sitting on unsold retail condo units--or the condo corporation dealing with the operation costs of the units with no rental income to make up for that. But if it were the latter case, I expect that the condo corp would drop the rent in order to attract tenants.
The units are listed for lease, so the developer isn't sitting on unsold commercial condo units. But I'm certain they're not run by the condo, that would be a multi-million dollar gift from the developer to the purchasers.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 07-14-2024
(07-13-2024, 09:14 AM)taylortbb Wrote:(07-11-2024, 10:12 PM)tomh009 Wrote: It's either the developer sitting on unsold retail condo units--or the condo corporation dealing with the operation costs of the units with no rental income to make up for that. But if it were the latter case, I expect that the condo corp would drop the rent in order to attract tenants.
The units are listed for lease, so the developer isn't sitting on unsold commercial condo units. But I'm certain they're not run by the condo, that would be a multi-million dollar gift from the developer to the purchasers.
This is like saying that the "free gift you get with your purchase" is a free gift...
No...it's just part of the purchase. If these were allocated to the condo corporation by the developer, it would simply increase the value of the properties. And the developer would be motivated to do this because it would transfer risk to the condo corporation (for example, the risk that they would be unable to lease these units).
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 07-14-2024
Exactly. It's no different from common areas. The developer can sell the retail units individually, or they can build the cost of those retail units into the prices of the residential units.
Most condo developers do not want to retain ownership of the units and lease them out as they are not in the real estate leasing business.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - taylortbb - 07-14-2024
(07-14-2024, 01:56 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:(07-13-2024, 09:14 AM)taylortbb Wrote: The units are listed for lease, so the developer isn't sitting on unsold commercial condo units. But I'm certain they're not run by the condo, that would be a multi-million dollar gift from the developer to the purchasers.
This is like saying that the "free gift you get with your purchase" is a free gift...
No...it's just part of the purchase. If these were allocated to the condo corporation by the developer, it would simply increase the value of the properties. And the developer would be motivated to do this because it would transfer risk to the condo corporation (for example, the risk that they would be unable to lease these units).
"It would simply increase the value of the properties" sounds a lot like the efficient market hypothesis, which I'm really skeptical of in the residential real estate market. People are terrible at accounting for the costs of their purchases. People can't even account for the cost of gas, nevermind the cost of their time, from purchasing homes at the far edges of suburbia. They're not going to account for the value of a commercial unit's rent to offset their condo fees.
Selling the commercial unit(s) as a separate unit would almost certainly have far better returns for the developer than hoping that the promise of a condo fee offset in the future would adequately raise the sale price of all the residential units.
So yes, forgoing the higher return of selling the commercial unit as it's own condo unit, and instead taking the lower return of bundling it in for the residential purchasers, would absolutely be a huge gift to the residential purchasers.
(07-14-2024, 08:36 AM)tomh009 Wrote: Most condo developers do not want to retain ownership of the units and lease them out as they are not in the real estate leasing business.
I agree, and I never suggested they would. It's almost certainly just another unit of the condo, which was sold to a commercial landlord.