Grand River Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Grand River Transit (/showthread.php?tid=13) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
|
RE: Grand River Transit - zanate - 11-27-2015 (11-27-2015, 04:22 PM)KevinL Wrote:(11-27-2015, 03:15 PM)chutten Wrote: This wouldn't be a problem if GRT released their realtime data like they said in August(pdf) they would (still no sign of it). The easyGo mobile app launched one year ago. In the consultations of fall 2014, they talked about wanting to withhold access to the real time data from third party developers "for a few months", in order to sort these concerns out. One year later, still no official access. I don't know about you, but I'm done making excuses for them. They're talking a lot about open data and it's time to walk that talk. RE: Grand River Transit - mpd618 - 11-27-2015 (11-27-2015, 04:22 PM)KevinL Wrote:(11-27-2015, 03:15 PM)chutten Wrote: This wouldn't be a problem if GRT released their realtime data like they said in August(pdf) they would (still no sign of it). They haven't found it to be a double-edged sword. That's a fear in their imagination, and that fear is outweighing the real benefits to the public of easily knowing where their goddamn bus is. RE: Grand River Transit - zanate - 11-27-2015 (11-27-2015, 04:52 PM)mpd618 Wrote: They haven't found it to be a double-edged sword. That's a fear in their imagination, and that fear is outweighing the real benefits to the public of easily knowing where their goddamn bus is. And they've already got their own metrics and the press that shows they're getting out in front of this, like they said they wanted. 3 months ago. http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5812751-grt-buses-miss-the-mark-20-per-cent-of-the-time/ RE: Grand River Transit - goggolor - 12-11-2015 Google Maps is now using GRT real-time data. If you look up transit directions in Google Maps, it will show whether the bus is on time and if not, how late it is running. RE: Grand River Transit - KevinL - 12-11-2015 Given that the open data is not officially available, I suppose they must be stripping info from EasyGo much like the Transit app does. RE: Grand River Transit - taylortbb - 12-11-2015 I wouldn't assume that. Google doesn't get their data from publicly available sources, rather transit agencies submit their data to Google (in a format Google defines). It's possible for agencies to submit their data to Google without making it officially public. Unofficially Google requires it be at a public URL, but absent knowing that URL it's effectively private. RE: Grand River Transit - goggolor - 12-12-2015 I did a comparison while waiting for my bus on Friday rush hour, when the iXpress is reliably late. The Transit App and Google Maps were displaying the same estimated arrival times, which differed from the time on the official GRT EasyGo app by several minutes. It seems like both external apps had a significant delay in getting updated data. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 12-17-2015 Region floats free transit for poor from The Record today. I don't like when it's insinuated that transit is a social service. But I generally think more transit revenue should come from public subsidies than from riders. This would really just be an expansion of existing programs to help people of less economic means access transit; it's probably a good idea on balance. RE: Grand River Transit - Spokes - 12-17-2015 Interesting idea. I'd imagine the response to the idea will be quite mixed. I don't even want to look at the comments on that Record article though. RE: Grand River Transit - Viewfromthe42 - 12-17-2015 We already do this somewhat, both with subsidized passes, and I believe the locations where we've had free meals or a place to sleep would give out a GRT ticket to anyone. We have plenty of studies which show that the direct cost of doing an obviously good thing (e.g. paying to house all homeless people) is far less, and has far greater results, than the sum of indirect costs and impacts of "saving" that money. I'd need to know more, but I like the idea a great deal on first glance. Sure, there will be questions. How much revenue would this remove? What would the administration costs be? Would buses become places the homeless would treat as shelters from weather or for sleep? I'm sure that last one is not a reasonable question, but it will be asked, along with many others, that need good answers from the get-go, lest we have the conversation start and stay on a wrong rumour foot. RE: Grand River Transit - chutten - 12-17-2015 I see a lot of spend by GRT on fare systems. Why _not_ just make public transit single-payer? We already do that with healthcare to some success. Right now having it be partially subsidized and partially based on fare cards and partially on tickets and partially on cash... it seems inefficient. Just let the people on the bus and let the people off the bus, and we'll get where we're going faster. (begin comments written by people who don't and won't use public transit attacking this idea.) (begin comments written by people who do and will use public transit supporting this idea.) RE: Grand River Transit - kwliving - 12-17-2015 I'd rather subsidise free transit than pay staff and consultants an equal amount to study the effects of it, which seems to be the long term trend. RE: Grand River Transit - plam - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 11:12 AM)chutten Wrote: I see a lot of spend by GRT on fare systems. Why _not_ just make public transit single-payer? We already do that with healthcare to some success. Right now having it be partially subsidized and partially based on fare cards and partially on tickets and partially on cash... it seems inefficient. No one of our size has tried that yet. Talinn, Estonia is close: http://citiscope.org/story/2014/free-public-transit-tallinn-hit-riders-yields-unexpected-results They managed to make the cost work out, though, using incentives that we don't have: the claim is that free transit induced more people to register as residents of Talinn. I don't think that's a thing here nearly as much. Can someone remind me of the farebox recovery rate of the GRT? In the absence of good empirical data, we're in the land of hypothetical arguments, which always makes me somewhat uncomfortable. There is an issue with respect to things that people don't pay for. Sometimes that's not good, in that people then ascribe zero value to that thing. RE: Grand River Transit - MidTowner - 12-17-2015 I don't know what GRT's farebox recovery rate is, but I seem to recall it's in the high thirty percent range. I do know that their goal is to increase it to 50%. Roads are by and large funded through property taxes paid regardless of the extent to which someone might use them. So maybe transit should be funded the same way. But I don't think the former case is right- roads should be to a much greater extent be paid for through tools like gas or vehicle distance traveled taxes (or, even better, direct tolls where it makes sense). I've read that Tallinn's program hasn't significantly increased ridership. And I've also read suggestions that fare-free transit decreases user's sense of ownership of the system, with some unpleasant results (increased vandalism, that kind of thing). I don't know. I'm personally generally of the mind that giving people pricing cues (by charging them something, even if a far cry from the true cost) probably results in more efficient usage. Hey, maybe the sweet spot is to charge transit users enough to cover the costs of the fare collection system. RE: Grand River Transit - Canard - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 11:12 AM)chutten Wrote: (begin comments written by people who don't and won't use public transit attacking this idea.) Darn, I don't fit into either of your dichotomies, so I guess I can't reply to this thread. (I'm a motorist and would have no problem paying more in taxes to make public transport fareless) |