+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - cherrypark - 05-11-2023
(05-11-2023, 12:37 PM)Lebronj23 Wrote: A cool article about growth/investment KW - it also mentions they are planning to convert the office at 22 Fredrick to residential
https://renx.ca/heavy-kitchener-waterloo-focus-at-southwestern-ontario-re-forum
Very interested to see how that residential conversion goes.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 05-11-2023
(05-11-2023, 03:12 PM)cherrypark Wrote:(05-11-2023, 12:37 PM)Lebronj23 Wrote: A cool article about growth/investment KW - it also mentions they are planning to convert the office at 22 Fredrick to residential
https://renx.ca/heavy-kitchener-waterloo-focus-at-southwestern-ontario-re-forum
Very interested to see how that residential conversion goes.
Not a trivial project. The floorplate size might be suitable, and the elevators might be OK. Some things are easy (amenities, building access, parking, garbage chutes) but they'll also need to install plumbing and convert HVAC to something like a chiller-based system. And balconies, or none?
The old RBC building did a cheap conversion with in-unit air conditioners but that is also a much smaller building.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 05-13-2023
(05-11-2023, 03:12 PM)cherrypark Wrote:(05-11-2023, 12:37 PM)Lebronj23 Wrote: A cool article about growth/investment KW - it also mentions they are planning to convert the office at 22 Fredrick to residential
https://renx.ca/heavy-kitchener-waterloo-focus-at-southwestern-ontario-re-forum
Very interested to see how that residential conversion goes.
“We're transitioning 22 Frederick into a residential building to serve the downtown for rental needs to serve students who may be at Conestoga College," explains Europro Vice-President Jesse Nathanson.
https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/temporary-closure-means-40-fewer-parking-spots-in-downtown-kitchener-1.6396645
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - Lebronj23 - 05-15-2023
A good up to date illustration of the proposals in the pipeline, crazy to see how many are much taller than DTK only in the last few years
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=101299079
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - sevenman - 05-15-2023
(05-15-2023, 07:05 PM)Lebronj23 Wrote: A good up to date illustration of the proposals in the pipeline, crazy to see how many are much taller than DTK only in the last few years
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=101299079
I noticed TEK Tower 2 and TEK Tower 3 on there. Are they new proposals?
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - sevenman - 05-15-2023
(05-15-2023, 09:09 PM)sevenman Wrote:(05-15-2023, 07:05 PM)Lebronj23 Wrote: A good up to date illustration of the proposals in the pipeline, crazy to see how many are much taller than DTK only in the last few years
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=101299079
I noticed TEK Tower 2 and TEK Tower 3 on there. Are they new proposals?
Quick Google search. Tek Tower 2 and 3 are the IN8 proposals on Queen and on Charles........Carry on
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 05-16-2023
(05-13-2023, 08:20 AM)tomh009 Wrote: “We're transitioning 22 Frederick into a residential building to serve the downtown for rental needs to serve students who may be at Conestoga College," explains Europro Vice-President Jesse Nathanson.
https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/temporary-closure-means-40-fewer-parking-spots-in-downtown-kitchener-1.6396645
Won’t that make at least one of the bridges really useful? I’d love to be able to get to class without getting my boots on!
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - westwardloo - 05-16-2023
It appears developers are taking the cities new parks by-law to OLT. I have mixed feelings on this one. On one hand I do think the city needs to build up a fund to develop new parkland throughout the city. On the other hand it is quite clear that once again the Urban city centre residents are paying for facility expansion in the suburbs. If the funds were used strictly to purchase land in areas of the city with lacking parks space (City centre) I would be more on board for the increase in fees. Funding the suburbs with fees from densification and taxes from existing neighbourhoods is not sustainable. The Mattamy Homes of the world should be funding new schools, parks, community centres in these neighbourhoods. Clearly people still want to buy into the suburban life so tack on a 50-100k fee to each lot sold to fund the amenities required.
https://archive.ph/n5Bam
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - cherrypark - 05-16-2023
(05-16-2023, 09:31 AM)westwardloo Wrote: It appears developers are taking the cities new parks by-law to OLT. I have mixed feelings on this one. On one hand I do think the city needs to build up a fund to develop new parkland throughout the city. On the other hand it is quite clear that once again the Urban city centre residents are paying for facility expansion in the suburbs. If the funds were used strictly to purchase land in areas of the city with lacking parks space (City centre) I would be more on board for the increase in fees. Funding the suburbs with fees from densification and taxes from existing neighbourhoods is not sustainable. The Mattamy Homes of the world should be funding new schools, parks, community centres in these neighbourhoods. Clearly people still want to buy into the suburban life so tack on a 50-100k fee to each lot sold to fund the amenities required.
https://archive.ph/n5Bam
I find both ends disappointing: that the developers don't see contributing to the parkland and amenities as a relevant cost of high densification, while also seeing the inequity that is putting this money into the general parks and recreation funding that is going to build $90M+ rec centres to serve new communities (who have swaths of unsustainable utilities and linear infrastructure that is already going to drag the city in the future).
Would be nice to see those 10 developers instead put some kind of counter proposal together that would likely increase the attraction and value of their future developments downtown anyways, or contribute collectively to assembling some more blocks of parkland in abutting parcels they have.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - bravado - 05-16-2023
I don’t see why developers should be paying to provide public services. This indirectly means that new residents will be paying in the end.
If our tax dollars don’t adequately support building new parks, then raise the taxes. Why can’t we do what previous generations did and build things? Why do future residents have to subsidize existing ones?*
* because our budgets are strained from past mistakes, so we keep making new ones to cover up the gaps
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - cherrypark - 05-16-2023
(05-16-2023, 10:53 AM)bravado Wrote: I don’t see why developers should be paying to provide public services. This indirectly means that new residents will be paying in the end.
If our tax dollars don’t adequately support building new parks, then raise the taxes. Why can’t we do what previous generations did and build things? Why do future residents have to subsidize existing ones?*
* because our budgets are strained from past mistakes, so we keep making new ones to cover up the gaps
Because the municipal tax rate is permanently the #1 concern of those running for council. Raising tax more vs. burdening newcomers (or more likely renters under those owners) who can't currently vote against you and won't see the direct causal relationship is an easy choice with those incentives.
Your argument for fairness isn't wrong, its just unlikely to ever be that people's altruism exceeds their pocketbook defence.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 05-16-2023
I do think that developers (really, new property buyers) should pay for new infrastructure needed to support new developments.
This is actually how development has worked for a long time. Taxes should support maintenance of existing properties, but new development should pay for it's own services.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - westwardloo - 05-16-2023
(05-16-2023, 12:00 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I do think that developers (really, new property buyers) should pay for new infrastructure needed to support new developments.
This is actually how development has worked for a long time. Taxes should support maintenance of existing properties, but new development should pay for it's own services.
Exactly this!
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 05-16-2023
(05-16-2023, 12:00 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I do think that developers (really, new property buyers) should pay for new infrastructure needed to support new developments.
This is actually how development has worked for a long time. Taxes should support maintenance of existing properties, but new development should pay for it's own services.
Clearly true. Imagine if the city was built up to the border, and on the other side was a fully rural township with about 200 residents total. Now a developer builds a 2000 house development in the rural township. Who should pay for the parks, recreation centres, arterial roads, sewer pipes, wires, and all the other infrastructure needed? I hope it’s clear that the 200 existing residents not only shouldn’t but literally cannot pay.
It’s no different if there are more existing residents, other than that it actually is possible to hide the unsustainability in a mysteriously expensive city budget in a way that is not possible in the rural township thought experiment.
Coincidentally this happens to give an incentive to build dense walkable developments. The closer everything is together and the less need for vehicles, the less needs to be spent on building it all. Actually, not coincidentally — the reason I like walkable neighbourhoods and other features we associate with urban areas is that they’re better for everybody, not because they sometimes seem foreign to drivers.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - bravado - 05-16-2023
I understand paying for the new pipes that go to your development, but we all know that these recently quadrupled park fees are not going towards parks for these new residents - this is a shakedown that’s been going on for a while and will have some real blowback sooner or later.