+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Land Development and Real Estate (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Urban Areas (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours (/showthread.php?tid=8)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - GarthDanlor - 03-17-2021
I was walking through Cedar Hill this morning and passed the site of the old water tower at 100 George St. When it came down I believe there was talk of turning the property into a parkette or public gardens but that obviously hasn't happened yet. Has anyone heard anything about this site? Presumably it is (or was?) owned by the Region?
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - jamincan - 03-17-2021
I'm not sure the point with Sand Hills Park right across the street.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 03-17-2021
I would vote for affordable housing there. And hopefully that is indeed what the region is planning to do.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - GarthDanlor - 03-17-2021
(03-17-2021, 12:17 PM)jamincan Wrote: I'm not sure the point with Sand Hills Park right across the street.That's true enough. I found the reference and the proposal was actually for a community garden to go here. Saw this mentioned a couple of times in the Record. Outline.com doesn't seem to be working, but this is also briefly mentioned here: https://communityedition.ca/if-streets-could-talk-cedar-hill/
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - GarthDanlor - 03-17-2021
(03-17-2021, 12:36 PM)tomh009 Wrote: I would vote for affordable housing there. And hopefully that is indeed what the region is planning to do.Yes, that seems a better idea
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ac3r - 03-17-2021
Some affordable middle housing would be perfect there. You could easily fit 10+ units on that location...even more if you don't have any stupid parking minimums. I doubt that would ever happen, though.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 03-17-2021
(03-17-2021, 03:38 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some affordable middle housing would be perfect there. You could easily fit 10+ units on that location...even more if you don't have any stupid parking minimums. I doubt that would ever happen, though.
Yeah, 10 would be easy, the apartments behind easily fit 20 units in the same space.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ijmorlan - 03-17-2021
(03-17-2021, 03:38 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some affordable middle housing would be perfect there. You could easily fit 10+ units on that location...even more if you don't have any stupid parking minimums. I doubt that would ever happen, though.
The notion of parking minima applying to affordable housing is even more absurd than the general notion of parking minima.
Our whole society is unaffordable, not to mention messing up the climate in which it lives, in large part due to our massive overuse of the admittedly very useful technology of motorized personal vehicles.
People who have to watch every penny should not be forced to pay for parking; if they are stuck in a life situation that requires them to drive, then they can buy parking.
It’s weird. I tend to think of a $2000 bicycle as a luxury item unlikely to be owned by anybody in the bottom quartile of income; but in fact such a vehicle is way more affordable than the $5000 car they might own which is constantly causing them to have to spend additional money on repairs and maintenance. Assuming we had the small investment in bicycle roadways required to support this, our poor people would suddenly be much richer, in effect and on average, if they ditched their cars and bought fancy bicycles.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - danbrotherston - 03-17-2021
(03-17-2021, 06:00 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(03-17-2021, 03:38 PM)ac3r Wrote: Some affordable middle housing would be perfect there. You could easily fit 10+ units on that location...even more if you don't have any stupid parking minimums. I doubt that would ever happen, though.
The notion of parking minima applying to affordable housing is even more absurd than the general notion of parking minima.
Our whole society is unaffordable, not to mention messing up the climate in which it lives, in large part due to our massive overuse of the admittedly very useful technology of motorized personal vehicles.
People who have to watch every penny should not be forced to pay for parking; if they are stuck in a life situation that requires them to drive, then they can buy parking.
It’s weird. I tend to think of a $2000 bicycle as a luxury item unlikely to be owned by anybody in the bottom quartile of income; but in fact such a vehicle is way more affordable than the $5000 car they might own which is constantly causing them to have to spend additional money on repairs and maintenance. Assuming we had the small investment in bicycle roadways required to support this, our poor people would suddenly be much richer, in effect and on average, if they ditched their cars and bought fancy bicycles.
Preach!
Even worse, one is far far more likely to be stolen, and not returned.
This is the thing that's frustrating, yes, motorvehicles can be useful. Just like screwdrivers are useful. But if we were drowning in screwdrivers, we wouldn't be arguing that they are useful and we can't get rid of them.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - dtkvictim - 03-18-2021
(03-17-2021, 12:17 PM)jamincan Wrote: I'm not sure the point with Sand Hills Park right across the street.
The point would be to have more park space. I think the city doesn't have enough green space as is, and will feel more strongly about that as the city densifies. IMO, it will be much easier to keep undeveloped space green than it would be to turn already built up land into green space or affordable housing.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 03-18-2021
(03-18-2021, 07:34 PM)dtkvictim Wrote:(03-17-2021, 12:17 PM)jamincan Wrote: I'm not sure the point with Sand Hills Park right across the street.
The point would be to have more park space. I think the city doesn't have enough green space as is, and will feel more strongly about that as the city densifies. IMO, it will be much easier to keep undeveloped space green than it would be to turn already built up land into green space or affordable housing.
I agree with your point in general, but the property is only 0.28 acres, just over a tenth the size of the Sandhills Park -- and not situated so as to really effectively extend the park. I would rather focus on creating significant parks at city-owned opportunities like Rockwood, or similar.
This is about 20% smaller than 122 Courtland, which has 14 units. Depending on the type of housing and the number of parking spaces, it could provide 10-15 affordable housing units, which is nothing to sneeze at.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - cherrypark - 03-19-2021
(06-17-2020, 12:02 PM)cherrypark Wrote:(11-09-2019, 04:55 PM)KevinL Wrote: This grassy triangle: https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.4481554,-80.5041696,155m/data=!3m1!1e3
Not a big development, but interestingly this lot had basically every tree clear cut as of yesterday. Not sure what spurred it unless it was just some clean up by someone who acquired it. Gravel drive laid down and some digging happening at the site.
As of today this whole spot is now a big hole. Not clear what is going on, but might just be soil cleanup and improving drainage given it used to be oil/gas relative, if I'm not mistaken.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - mastermind - 03-19-2021
I couldn't find a thread for this but 169 Borden has the trees cut down and a construction trailer on site.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - tomh009 - 03-20-2021
(03-19-2021, 10:24 PM)cherrypark Wrote:(06-17-2020, 12:02 PM)cherrypark Wrote: Not a big development, but interestingly this lot had basically every tree clear cut as of yesterday. Not sure what spurred it unless it was just some clean up by someone who acquired it. Gravel drive laid down and some digging happening at the site.
As of today this whole spot is now a big hole. Not clear what is going on, but might just be soil cleanup and improving drainage given it used to be oil/gas relative, if I'm not mistaken.
It's zoned MR-4 (mixed-used residential, high density) but there are no building permits for either this property or any of the neighbouring properties that would connect it to Park St or Victoria St.
RE: General Urban Kitchener Updates and Rumours - ac3r - 03-20-2021
(03-19-2021, 11:36 PM)mastermind Wrote: I couldn't find a thread for this but 169 Borden has the trees cut down and a construction trailer on site.
I wonder what's they're doing there. It's still zoned institutional (INS-1) as it used to be a retirement home.