ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - zanate - 04-11-2016 (04-11-2016, 08:43 AM)timc Wrote: I for one don't care about overhead wires, and I don't think existing wires should be buried without a good reason. Needing to make room for a sidewalk on Caroline seems like a good reason. If this is needed, why didn't it go into the original project plan? Change orders are expensive. Two quotes from the report: Quote:In many locations along the LRT, burial of the hydro system is required to achieve adequate separation from existing buildings and/or other overhead electrical services; burial in these locations is the responsibility of the Region of Waterloo. For the LRT Uptown segments where the burial of the hydro system is not an LRT requirement, there is an opportunity for the City to enter an agreement with Waterloo North Hydro for a cost-effective solution. Quote:In conjunction with LRT, the City’s share of the cost is estimated to be $1,088,000 to bury the hydro system and install decorative streetlights on Caroline Street from Allen Street to Erb Street. If the City were to initiate the burial of hydro and install decorative streetlights on this same stretch of road as a stand-alone project, the costs would be approximately $2,800,000 to $3,472,000 (based on preliminary estimates from Waterloo North Hydro). In conjunction with LRT, the City’s cost is estimated to be $1,088,000. So in summary: burial is not required, even if it's desirable. So it's not part of the project. However, if the city wants, the burial can still be achieved for about 1/3 of the usual cost, so I don't thing there's a big penalty for discussing it now. There's plenty of things that the LRT project could have had built into it, like full hydro burial along the route, catenary-free operation, or greenways. The approach to the project included a lot of "value engineering" back in the heady days of 2009-2011, where staff looked for ways to bring the costs of the project down. So you strip out the optional extras and fight hard against scope creep. While there's things I would have liked to have seen as part of this project, I think this was the right decision here. I've mentioned that before: this project came pretty close to not happening a number of times, and scope management to control costs is a big reason (in my opinion) why it has survived. Maybe if ION and intensification helps build a better sense of city and civic pride, we might see future projects aim higher. That's a big difference between here, and (say) Ottawa, and that difference is reflected in our respective LRT projects. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MidTowner - 04-11-2016 (04-11-2016, 10:55 AM)mpd618 Wrote: My understanding is that burying the wires replaces an overground constraint for trees with an underground one, and it's not clear that it's a win. Is it possible/easy to place the wires in a way that it wouldn't conflict with street tree planting? I don’t think the impediments to trees of underground wires are nearly as serious as those of overhead wires. Obviously a tree can’t be planted directly over underground utilities, but I think they can coexist at very close proximity. If a repair needs to be made, that could damage a tree, but as far as I know very large trees with extensive root systems can be planted on streets with underground wires without any more worry than we would give to the existence of things like water mains- which is to say, some, but nowhere near the constraints placed by overhead wires. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - SammyOES - 04-11-2016 I don't have a study but I think there's a pretty big benefit with buried power lines in storms as well. Since moving to an area with buried power lines we've had almost no power outages. And the ones we've had have been widespread outages that get fixed relatively quickly. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MidTowner - 04-11-2016 That’s the primary benefit, really: lower maintenance costs for the utility because of less frequent damage and outages. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - nms - 04-12-2016 Unless you happen to be in an area that is susceptible to flooding. If I recall within one calendar year the Toronto utility was lambasted for having overhead wires that were affected by falling trees in the winter, and then six months later it was lambasted for putting utilities underground where they got flooded out. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - panamaniac - 04-12-2016 So the Region's community services committee has approved $385,000 for seven art installations at ION stations. That's $385,000 for all seven, not $385,000 each. One wonders why they even bother. I fear the eventual winning installations will either junk up the stations or be too insignificant to be noticed. Sigh of disappointment. http://www.therecord.com/news-story/6482989-lrt-art-gets-385-000-in-funding/ RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - LesPio - 04-12-2016 (04-12-2016, 08:41 PM)panamaniac Wrote: So the Region's community services committee has approved $385,000 for seven art installations at ION stations. That's $385,000 for all seven, not $385,000 each. One wonders why they even bother. I fear the eventual winning installations will either junk up the stations or be too insignificant to be noticed. Sigh of disappointment. They could have saved money and used the Prime Minister statues. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MidTowner - 04-12-2016 (04-12-2016, 08:41 PM)panamaniac Wrote: So the Region's community services committee has approved $385,000 for seven art installations at ION stations. That's $385,000 for all seven, not $385,000 each. One wonders why they even bother. I fear the eventual winning installations will either junk up the stations or be too insignificant to be noticed. Sigh of disappointment. I think I'm missing something. $50,000+ seems like enough for a nice mural or sculpture. How much should "art installations" cost without being "junk"? I would have had the opposite reaction had it been $385,000 EACH. How can you spend a third of a million dollars on a piece of art that fits inside a street car station? RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 04-12-2016 Walking through Uptown today and seeing how the old infrastructure is so imbedded and nearby the corduroy road it makes you wonder how other road work has missed finding it over the course of the many rebuilds of King St over the years. Perhaps the laws weren't as clear, or enforced, as to what needed to be investigated and/or preserved. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Lens - 04-12-2016 Catenary supports are poured along the hydro corridor, work has definitely picked up quickly in that area. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - eizenstriet - 04-12-2016 (04-12-2016, 10:13 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: Walking through Uptown today and seeing how the old infrastructure is so imbedded and nearby the corduroy road it makes you wonder how other road work has missed finding it over the course of the many rebuilds of King St over the years. Last week when I walked by the guardians who were carefully exposing the corduroy road, I saw some conduit (not fresh, but modern era) running through the subsoil across the road right on top of the logs in a couple of places. I commented that the existence of the corduroy road wouldn't have been a surprise to everyone, to which the workers replied with a smile "It seems not." RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Markster - 04-12-2016 Who wants to deal with the paperwork and delays? Just run your conduit, quickly fill it back in, and job's done! RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jordan2423 - 04-12-2016 (04-11-2016, 12:52 PM)MidTowner Wrote: That’s the primary benefit, really: lower maintenance costs for the utility because of less frequent damage and outages. yes. In my neighbourhood we've had like 3 power outages - 2 of which have lasted several hours in the past couple months. Ridiculous. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 04-12-2016 (04-12-2016, 09:42 PM)MidTowner Wrote:(04-12-2016, 08:41 PM)panamaniac Wrote: So the Region's community services committee has approved $385,000 for seven art installations at ION stations. That's $385,000 for all seven, not $385,000 each. One wonders why they even bother. I fear the eventual winning installations will either junk up the stations or be too insignificant to be noticed. Sigh of disappointment. I agree, $50K should be fine for a non-trivial sculpture. As a data point, Ted Fullerton's multi-piece work at the Charles & Benton garage was budgeted at $150K, and it's much bigger than the ION stations have space for. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - SammyOES - 04-13-2016 Count me in the "would be very upset if we spent over 2.5 million on artwork" camp. I could see going a bit higher than $385,000 but not by much. |