Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - schooner77 - 01-13-2015

Not really a comparable analogy with regards to the condo/apartment/house argument. You're going to the lengths that would eliminate all advertising right down to billboards, bus shelters or sandwich boards. And in fact, there are often "for rent" or "lease" signs on many apartments and, I'm guessing, municipal bylaws against advertising in residential areas. I think the only argument that has credence, is not allowing it to impede sightless for the riders. Any coaches that I've been on, that have been painted in some theme or another, and where the windows are painted over, have been done so in a way that the covering acts more like tinted windows on a car.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Pheidippides - 01-13-2015

According to page 186 of http://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/regionalGovernment/resources/PA2014-0304.pdf the region is expecting $.25milion in advertising revenue from LRT in 2018.

Also I noticed in today's Planning & Works agenda (page 51 of http://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/regionalGovernment/resources/PW/PA2015-0115.pdf) that the general engineering consultant (GEC) for LRT was up for renewal. The report states that the GEC, which part of the non-DFBOM LRT buget category of "project office & consulting" with a $51.8 milllion budget, is $2.73 million under budget for March 2012-March 2015 (budget 16.58, final estimate 13.85) and projected to be another $2.5 million under for March-2015 to March-2018 (budget 14.0, revised estimate 11.5). I guess that $5.23 million will go in to the contingency?

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - mpd618 - 01-13-2015

(01-13-2015, 05:22 PM)SammyOES Wrote:
(01-12-2015, 11:16 PM)mpd618 Wrote: The problem with "those are my tax dollars, dammit" attitudes is that it comes at the dignity of riders. Apparently it's OK for a public service to be degrading because it's public.

Degrading?  Hyperbole much?  

I'm fine with saying ads shouldn't impede the view (for safety/usability reasons) but the idea that having to look at ads is a degrading experience is absolutely absurd.

I was responding to discussion of a bus wrap that incorporated the passengers - that I do consider potentially degrading.

And no, it isn't having to look at ads that is degrading, it's being forced to ride in a moving billboard. The ads on the inside of the bus don't bother me as much, because they are not affecting the externally-perceived image of the bus.

(01-13-2015, 05:22 PM)SammyOES Wrote: I think people will still know its a bus. 

Knowing that it's a bus is nowhere near as useful as knowing (whether you're interested or not) that it's a Grand River Transit bus. There's lots of buses out there, but it's a whole lot more apparent when you see a distinctive GO Transit bus go by than when you see a Grand River Transit bus. That adds up to better awareness of the brand and the service.

(01-13-2015, 05:22 PM)SammyOES Wrote: School buses are yellow for safety reasons for kids but I'd be quite happy to see ads on the ION as well.

School buses can be yellow for safety reasons (and also consistent branding reasons) while still having ads. How about it?

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-14-2015

Well said! Can you imagine how confusing buses in Toronto would be if they had wraps, with all the different regional operators? Occasional passengers would be totally confused.

Also, let's think about something else... How many hundred busses does the region have? They pull in 800k, right? We're getting *fourteen* trains. Is the fractional income from destroying the visage of those trains worth it?!

I'm tempted to start a Kickstarter to raise the cash that would offset the ads to give to the region if they promise to keep the trains clean. Smile

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - SammyOES - 01-14-2015

I would totally support a Kickstarter campaign like that purely because I love the idea of something cosmetic like that being funded only by the people that care about it.

You wouldn't even need to make the region promise - you could just buy the ad space!

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jamincan - 01-14-2015

(01-14-2015, 08:19 AM)Canard Wrote: Well said! Can you imagine how confusing buses in Toronto would be if they had wraps, with all the different regional operators? Occasional passengers would be totally confused.

The TTC does full wraps of buses, streetcars, subways and even entire stations. It's really not a big deal and I have never found it confusing personally.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - nms - 01-14-2015

(01-13-2015, 10:50 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: I guess that $5.23 million will go in to the contingency?

Let's hope that GrandLinq is similarly thrifty.  Since the Region reduced the contingency significantly during its tender process, yet kept the overall LRT budget the same, it effectively handed GrandLinq a bonus before they even started.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - mpd618 - 01-15-2015

(01-14-2015, 02:04 PM)jamincan Wrote:
(01-14-2015, 08:19 AM)Canard Wrote: Well said! Can you imagine how confusing buses in Toronto would be if they had wraps, with all the different regional operators? Occasional passengers would be totally confused.

The TTC does full wraps of buses, streetcars, subways and even entire stations. It's really not a big deal and I have never found it confusing personally.

The TTC can't handle the demand they already have, let alone worry about competing with the private automobile to get more people taking transit. We've got a bit of a different problem here in Waterloo Region, and part of it has to do with the image of transit.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MacBerry - 01-17-2015

A vintage postcard from Waterloo Region. The "original LRT". 

#BackToOurRoots one hundred years later

In today's Waterloo Region Record (January 17, 2015)  

http://www.therecord.com/living-story/5260711-flash-from-the-past-a-look-back-at-idylwild-park/


[Image: FatW3uQ.jpg]

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - MacBerry - 01-17-2015

(12-21-2014, 02:49 AM)TMKM94 Wrote: A taxi driver I had the other day said his friend is one of the construction people working on Caroline, he told me they will be digging up Caroline again in Mid January.

Your information was correct:

"Beginning January 13 along Caroline from Allen to William, and continuing into early February, GrandLinq Contractors will install the infrastructure needed to relocate existing or provide new third-party services.  These services include communication (e.g., phone, intranet), gas and electrical services. Each installation will require a trench to be dug across Caroline (close by the Allen, Freemont, Norman and William intersections), and will take approximately one week to complete. Local access to businesses and residents will be maintained, along with access for fire, police and EMS. GrandLinq Contractors work crews will be on-site to help facilitate the movement of local traffic and construction vehicles."

http://rideion.ca/construction-updates.html#update16  - January 13th update

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-18-2015

Lots of work going on at Dutton yesterday - impressive that they're working weekends, I think.

I know it's still a ways off, but this scares me: TTC boss Byford 'not happy' about new streetcar delivery delays

Summary: Toronto was supposed to have 40 trains by now, but they only have 3, Bombardier is anticipating a 4th coming online in February, a 5th in March, and then an unknown schedule. They've committed to having all 204 sets delivered by 2019.

As our FLEXITY Freedom LFLRV's will be built in the same facility that is doing Toronto's Outlook vehicles, I really hope that this doesn't cause any headaches for us. Toronto can limp along without their new vehicles - we cannot!

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - BuildingScout - 01-19-2015

(01-18-2015, 11:14 PM)BrianT Wrote: We should be OK if they are not sourcing parts from Mexico like they are for the Outlook vehicles. They are supposed to start delivering our vehicles next year.

Erh, the delay is due to a strike in the Thunder Bay plant, nothing to do with sourcing from abroad.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jamincan - 01-19-2015

Bombardier recently released a statement that blamed the delays, in part, on parts arriving from Mexico not being to spec.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-20-2015

Another article, lots of goodies here:

http://business.financialpost.com/2015/01/05/bombardiers-thunder-bay-plant-hit-with-supply-chain-woes/

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Canard - 01-21-2015

Quote:Streetcar Procurement and Implementation
There are currently three (3) TTC owned revenue service LFLRVs operating well on the 510 Spadina line.
Transfer of technology and manufacturing from Europe to North America, including Mexico, has led to quality, design and process issues that have caused significant delays in new car shipments from the Carbuilder. Delay impacts have led to layoffs in the Bombardier Thunder Bay plant due to part shortages from Mexico and from external suppliers.
TTC continue to work with Bombardier to expedite deliveries while ensuring that all quality and safety objectives are met. Shipment of the next car (4405) from Thunder Bay is anticipated before the end of January, 2015, with commissioning and entry into service occurring before the end of February, 2015. The fifth revenue service car (4406) is anticipated to ship before the end of February, 2015 with commissioning and entry into service expected before the end of March, 2015. Production in Thunder Bay is currently impacted beyond car 4406 due to the supply chain issues.
TTC is anticipating a detailed schedule commitment from Bombardier before the end of February, 2015. Bombardier has stated through the media that it remains committed to delivering all 204 vehicles of the base LFLRV contract order to the TTC before the end of 2019.

From TTC January CEO Report