Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 10-31-2023

(10-31-2023, 12:57 PM)KevinL Wrote: If they only use double trains at, say, peak times, I'm not sure the platforms need much fixing; all the amenities are in place and the platform edges all meet spec. As use of them ramps up they can gradually apply upgrades, I'm sure.

Yes, this is technically possible. We are all going to call them out for being ridiculously cheap. And FWIW...I don't think it'll save all that much...I suspect trains are going to be much more expensive. It would also cause some operational issues. It would cause most passengers to board the first car, especially in bad weather, which is going to partially defeat the purpose of running two car trains, and it will also increase dwell times because as RM loves to talk about...the doors will not be properly utilized.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - the_conestoga_guy - 10-31-2023

As a hypothetical sidebar, I wonder what it would take to buy and commission autonomous LRT vehicles. It seems that it would help address the operating cost concerns at least. I know it would never happen given all of the regulatory hurdles, but it seems like it wouldn't actually be that difficult from a technical perspective since the trams are running a simple route on rails. It seems like the only difficult part would be needing to program them to avoid pedestrians and to wait for traffic lights.

Modern autonomous trains (I'm thinking of the Vancouver Skytrain) rely on the train network and remote communication to instruments in the tracks to keep things running smoothly, but I think that if Waterloo's LRTs were made to be self-driving, they would be locally controlled from some sort of on board sensor suite, similar to a Tesla or something. Maybe when the rolling stock is replaced in 50+ years, we could see something like this included. Probably just wishful thinking!

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - neonjoe - 10-31-2023

According to the Project Agreement we would be seeing two car vehicles starting in the 2025-2030 phase of the agreement. This was based on the original launch date occurring in 2017.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160812175909/http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/projectinformation/resources/2014-Sch.15-4Article1OperationsRequirementsRFPV4.pdf

Planned Fleet Sizes
2017-2020 - 14
2020-2024 -16
2025-2030 -20

I am wondering when the region will be approaching Alstom to purchase more. The dual car operations were only to start when there is a fleet of 20,

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 10-31-2023

(10-31-2023, 01:15 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:  It would also cause some operational issues. It would cause most passengers to board the first car, especially in bad weather, which is going to partially defeat the purpose of running two car trains, and it will also increase dwell times because as RM loves to talk about...the doors will not be properly utilized.

Ah, but at many stations the first car would be the one pulling in beyond the canopy, and the people there would then board the second car. I think there's enough variation among stations that it would generally even out.

Also, interesting that you should mention Reece... https://mstdn.social/@RM_Transit/111318976433051778

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 10-31-2023

(10-31-2023, 01:25 PM)KevinL Wrote:
(10-31-2023, 01:15 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:  It would also cause some operational issues. It would cause most passengers to board the first car, especially in bad weather, which is going to partially defeat the purpose of running two car trains, and it will also increase dwell times because as RM loves to talk about...the doors will not be properly utilized.

Ah, but at many stations the first car would be the one pulling in beyond the canopy, and the people there would then board the second car. I think there's enough variation among stations that it would generally even out.

Also, interesting that you should mention Reece... https://mstdn.social/@RM_Transit/111318976433051778

Oh, good point, yeah, you're right I looked at the sat view and they're split almost exactly 50/50 so that wouldn't be a problem.

They would however, have to place the door markers on the yellow edge line of tactile plates, because that's what the drivers line up with, but that's not a big deal.

   

Huh...interesting, it's funny, he was pretty cagey about where he moved to when he moved out of Toronto which I feel like was only a couple months ago.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 10-31-2023

Quote:I think I'm going to move to Waterloo region


Don't do it bro...

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 10-31-2023

(10-31-2023, 12:30 PM)SF22 Wrote: But we'll need to order new trains and fix up each station platform, and both of those things will take at least a couple of years to fully complete. It'll be interesting to see if the Region chooses to order a few more trains to run somewhat higher headways (once every 7-8 minutes) as a stopgap measure to reworking platforms and a larger train order

At the moment, the complete return trip takes about 100 minutes, from the Conestoga departure until the train leaves the same station again. With 10-minute headways, that's ten trains. They would be able to run eight-minute headways without any additional trains--and eight-minute headways would be better for passengers than double trains. With eight (or so) more trains they would be able to run five-minute headways, with the same capacity as double trains, but greater passenger convenience.

Increased frequency > increased train length

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 10-31-2023

Not always, it's way more nuanced than that. Convenience isn't the only contributing factor, there is a lot of logistics going on when it comes to transportation.

Like, faster but smaller scoops of dirt isn't necessarily going to be as useful as a huge wheelbarrow or dump truck full of it at once.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 10-31-2023

(10-31-2023, 06:25 PM)ac3r Wrote: Like, faster but smaller scoops of dirt isn't necessarily going to be as useful as a huge wheelbarrow or dump truck full of it at once.

Quite true. The dirt doesn't really care how long it has to wait for the dump truck.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 11-01-2023

(10-31-2023, 08:31 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(10-31-2023, 06:25 PM)ac3r Wrote: Like, faster but smaller scoops of dirt isn't necessarily going to be as useful as a huge wheelbarrow or dump truck full of it at once.

Quite true. The dirt doesn't really care how long it has to wait for the dump truck.

*blinks*...did ac3r really compare transit riders with...*checks notes*...dirt?!

I mean, even for them, I doubt that was the intention, but wow.

In any case, for transit riders, more frequent it always better. Other things can also be benefits, but there is basically no frequency high enough that more frequent won't be better.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 11-01-2023

(10-31-2023, 04:57 PM)tomh009 Wrote:
(10-31-2023, 12:30 PM)SF22 Wrote: But we'll need to order new trains and fix up each station platform, and both of those things will take at least a couple of years to fully complete. It'll be interesting to see if the Region chooses to order a few more trains to run somewhat higher headways (once every 7-8 minutes) as a stopgap measure to reworking platforms and a larger train order

At the moment, the complete return trip takes about 100 minutes, from the Conestoga departure until the train leaves the same station again. With 10-minute headways, that's ten trains. They would be able to run eight-minute headways without any additional trains--and eight-minute headways would be better for passengers than double trains. With eight (or so) more trains they would be able to run five-minute headways, with the same capacity as  double trains, but greater passenger convenience.

Increased frequency > increased train length

They really should be able to get the 100 minutes down to 90 minutes by being smarter about speed limits and refining signalling. That would also make a lot of headways work more naturally: 3 vehicles could maintain a 30 minute headway overnight, for example, or just 6 could provide 15 minute service.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 11-01-2023

Between Mill and Block Line alone trips could shave several minutes. The creek bridge and the run along Hayward are taken far too slowly and seem to have been set to some absurdly conservative limit for no clear reason.

They should also signalize the pedestrian crossing behind the Fairway shops and put in lift arms, that would save the trains going slower there.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 11-01-2023

(11-01-2023, 12:40 PM)KevinL Wrote: Between Mill and Block Line alone trips could shave several minutes. The creek bridge and the run along Hayward are taken far too slowly and seem to have been set to some absurdly conservative limit for no clear reason.

They should also signalize the pedestrian crossing behind the Fairway shops and put in lift arms, that would save the trains going slower there.

Yeah, the Hayward location is truly absurd.

The whole section from the creek to the hydro corridor is poorly thought out. Some of it can be fixed easily, some not so much.

I'm not sure you'd gain back 10 minutes though.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - nms - 11-01-2023

(10-31-2023, 01:23 PM)neonjoe Wrote: According to the Project Agreement we would be seeing two car vehicles starting in the 2025-2030 phase of the agreement. This was based on the original launch date occurring in 2017.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160812175909/http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/projectinformation/resources/2014-Sch.15-4Article1OperationsRequirementsRFPV4.pdf

Planned Fleet Sizes
2017-2020 - 14
2020-2024 -16
2025-2030 -20

I am wondering when the region will be approaching Alstom to purchase more. The dual car operations were only to start when there is a fleet of 20,

So even accounting for the two year delay with the mid-2019 launch, the Region is conceivably well within the 2020-2024 (corrected to 2022-2026) window when 16 trains would be in the fleet.  Since I don't know how far in advance an LRV must be ordered, it might also be time to consider getting in line for LRVs 17 to 20.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 11-02-2023

(11-01-2023, 01:04 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:
(11-01-2023, 12:40 PM)KevinL Wrote: Between Mill and Block Line alone trips could shave several minutes. The creek bridge and the run along Hayward are taken far too slowly and seem to have been set to some absurdly conservative limit for no clear reason.

They should also signalize the pedestrian crossing behind the Fairway shops and put in lift arms, that would save the trains going slower there.

Yeah, the Hayward location is truly absurd.

The whole section from the creek to the hydro corridor is poorly thought out. Some of it can be fixed easily, some not so much.

I'm not sure you'd gain back 10 minutes though.

I thought it was originally supposed to be 90 minutes round trip anyway.

You could get back a fair bit at Erb and Caroline southbound. And just adding 10km/h in all the places where it is idiotically kept, not to the speed of adjacent traffic but to the official speed limit of adjacent traffic, would add up over all the street running areas. Also I regularly observe motor vehicles get the green first northbound at Allen; assuming it’s ready to go the LRT should get the green first. If there are other similar locations that would give a bit more too.

I agree it’s hard to know how the numbers would actually come out but overall it really isn’t operated with any sense of urgency so I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to see 10 minutes shaved off with improved operations.