ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - dtkvictim - 03-09-2023 (03-09-2023, 02:30 PM)ac3r Wrote:(03-09-2023, 08:28 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: That is infeasible. You talk about grade separation as if it’s a minor tweak to the design, like having heated platforms. It’s not. So you deny and mock his argument, and then immediately acknowledge he is right? Building elevated or underground rail was infeasible, it was impossible. It's called politics. The only choices were build LRT, or stick with the status quo. The same status quo that I mentioned above which saw many students hit by cars over my 4 years at the school, vs the 1 student hit in nearly 4 years of LRT operation. The safety futures of our LRT are hardly exceptional on a global scale. Are you suggesting that the hundreds (perhaps thousands) of tram lines of Europe ought to be torn out and buried underground? I'm not suggesting improvements can't be made, but you seem to be going on an illogical personal vendetta against our system for some reason. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 03-09-2023 (03-09-2023, 11:21 AM)bravado Wrote: There’s all sorts of local trams right at ground level across the world. Is this a uniquely bad design in KW or just the unfortunate growing pains period? The same thing happens on University Ave. near UW and Laurier (and Conestoga College). Honestly...it's revealing how badly our engineering department has failed MOST of the people in the city. And I do say most. Yes, most people drive, but most of those people are also failed by the system. I don't think KW's system is uniquely bad...but transportation and safety in North America universally sucks. FWIW though...there's a reason we have fought so hard for the 30km/h limit. With the tram travelling at 40km/h the kid has even odds of surviving (maybe better than even because they're young), at 30km/h, they'd have a 90% chance of surviving. Of course, he's just lucky it wasn't someone in a vanity pickup who hit him...they'd usually be travelling much faster. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 03-09-2023 (03-09-2023, 02:23 PM)bravado Wrote: I think we have a responsibility to design around human behaviour, and to me it seems like excessive space for cars is what’s causing the LRT and pedestrian space to not be as safe as they could be. This is exactly on point...why isn't the crossing in front of the school? Well because it's where the other road is...pedestrians (which far outnumber cars at that intersection are not the prioritized user. Hell, pedestrians aren't even the prioritized vehicle AT LRT STATIONS! RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - neonjoe - 03-09-2023 It's also a tradeoff of the ability for emergency vehicles to enter the ROW. Otherwise we could have made the LRT median a bit less penetrable if they had used some sort of fence. This would essentially 'grade separate' the LRT except at intersections. Not really a fan of how this looks but maybe take the UoG example and put up something adjacent to the sidewalk in problematic areas. https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5342466,-80.2296403,3a,75y,176.7h,68.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sRh1K2lrh-97MV-m5_vzYig!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 03-09-2023 The victim has been confirmed to be a 16-year-old male; no word on his current condition. They haven't explicitly confirmed he's a CHCI student, but it's implied. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 03-10-2023 (03-09-2023, 02:50 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(03-09-2023, 02:23 PM)bravado Wrote: I think we have a responsibility to design around human behaviour, and to me it seems like excessive space for cars is what’s causing the LRT and pedestrian space to not be as safe as they could be. What are you talking about? The crossing at the traffic light is precisely in front of the main entrance: https://goo.gl/maps/yosxfDy6K6S8QTr88 I don’t see how it could be more appropriately situated. Now if you want to argue that the Betzner Ave. sidewalk should be extended to Charles and a crossing installed there, or that there should be a crossing at Pandora, we would have something to discuss. Where do you think the pedestrian crossing should be? In most places, road intersections are the proper place for pedestrian crossings anyway, because the pedestrian routes crossing the street are sidewalks on intersecting streets. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 03-10-2023 (03-10-2023, 01:32 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(03-09-2023, 02:50 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: This is exactly on point...why isn't the crossing in front of the school? Well because it's where the other road is...pedestrians (which far outnumber cars at that intersection are not the prioritized user. Yeah, sorry, my bad. I had confused the configuration up at KCI, which also has a very narrow uncomfortable sidewalk...even more so I think. As for Cameron Heights, yes, they are lined up. As for where crossings should be....they should be where pedestrians need and want to cross regardless of roads. Usually they follow roads because we rarely consider transportation routes without cars. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 03-10-2023 (03-10-2023, 02:52 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Yeah, sorry, my bad. I had confused the configuration up at KCI, which also has a very narrow uncomfortable sidewalk...even more so I think. OK, now I understand. I would say that crossings are also at roads because the pedestrian routes are sidewalks, which are immediately beside roads. That’s not to say we shouldn’t have more crossings at other locations where important pedestrian traffic routes meet the road, and more pedestrian routes which are not sidewalks, but crossings at intersections are natural as long as sidewalks are standard (and I think we want them to be standard in almost all situations). RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - timc - 03-10-2023 (03-09-2023, 03:06 PM)neonjoe Wrote: It's also a tradeoff of the ability for emergency vehicles to enter the ROW. Otherwise we could have made the LRT median a bit less penetrable if they had used some sort of fence. This would essentially 'grade separate' the LRT except at intersections. And the fact that no emergency vehicle will ever use the ROW makes that all the more frustrating. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Acitta - 03-12-2023 Another one. Pedestrian struck and killed by Ion train in Waterloo Police believe he had been walking on the tracks RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 03-12-2023 It mAkEs nO SeNsE To sPeNd a hUgE AmOuNt oF MoNeY GrAdE SePaRaTiNg tHe sYsTeM To sAvE OnE LiFe pEr yEaR Glad to hear the kid who got struck survived. Sad to hear there has nonetheless been an additional fatality. Hopefully Keolis/RoW has some good therapy services available for the LRV operators for what is going to be an inevitably long term problem: minimal safety, constant accidents and deaths every so often. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 03-13-2023 (03-12-2023, 09:38 PM)ac3r Wrote: It mAkEs nO SeNsE To sPeNd a hUgE AmOuNt oF MoNeY GrAdE SePaRaTiNg tHe sYsTeM To sAvE OnE LiFe pEr yEaR Why are you hyper-focussed on a tiny amount of death and injury related to the LRT? Why aren’t you agitating for grade-separating all our major car routes? Even if we did suddenly get a bunch of extra money, grade-separating the LRT wouldn’t save as many lives as a lot of other ways I can think of spending the money. Why is this so hard to understand? And why are you doing tHaT tHiNg with the capitalization? Could it be that you have no rational response to what I’m saying? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jFqhjaGh30 RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 03-13-2023 (03-13-2023, 07:49 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(03-12-2023, 09:38 PM)ac3r Wrote: It mAkEs nO SeNsE To sPeNd a hUgE AmOuNt oF MoNeY GrAdE SePaRaTiNg tHe sYsTeM To sAvE OnE LiFe pEr yEaR Why are you okay with a faulty transit system? That relatedly fails in the winter, gets into accidents all the time and which has maimed a child and taken two human lives and traumatized the people who operate the trains as well as the individuals who have been in accidents or have lost loved ones? What's so hard about admitting that it's faulty and should have been designed better so as to avoid this? This isn't a "tiny amount of death and injury", it's regular occurrence. Dozens of accidents, two deaths and junk trains that can't handle a bit of freezing rain. You can't pretend it isn't if you want but it doesn't change the reality. And pointing at the obvious fact that road vehicles kill more people is meaningless. Of course they do because there's more of them, but the issue here is faulty trains and poor safety. Yeah we should think of the children, great observation. Consider the one that was just struck and hurt so bad they were air lifted away any has now had his life utterly altered. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - neonjoe - 03-13-2023 The Toronto subway claims many lives a year as well and its grade separated. We don't know the circumstances for this specific case but walking in a fenced area of the system in the middle of the night could have been due to many different reasons. With the TO case, platform screen doors could help but really there's a point of declining returns for the investment made. Where there's a will to trespass there will always be a way. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ZEBuilder - 03-13-2023 (03-13-2023, 08:02 AM)ac3r Wrote: Why are you okay with a faulty transit system? That relatedly fails in the winter, gets into accidents all the time and which has maimed a child and taken two human lives and traumatized the people who operate the trains as well as the individuals who have been in accidents or have lost loved ones? It isn't a regular occurrence. There's been a total of two fatal collisions involving the LRT (both within the train only corridors in Waterloo where pedestrians shouldn't be in the first place) and then there has been two serious collisions resulting in air lifting to hospital, one cyclist at King and Green and the most recent incident in front of Cameron Heights. That is a total of only 4 major incidents with the LRT. Now look at collision data, in the 5 years that the region has recent data for (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020). There were a total of 30 fatalities from car accidents, as well as numerous other people having to be airlifted. Since the ION was put into service in June 2019 (a total of 1361 days of service) there has only been 2 deaths which is roughly 1 every 680 days, compared to the 30 deaths from car related collisions in those 5 years which means a death every 60 days on our roads. So considering the number of trains running on the line daily it is safe, obviously there could be improvements yet the same thing can be said about roads and you aren't saying anything about that. This is the first winter we've ever had substantial trouble with the LRT system so you can't justify the system being bad when it takes time to get more equipment, you can't just go to Walmart and het ice scrapper's for our trains, nor can you get the deicing machine they had up in Waterloo these things take time, next year if it's the same problem it's more justifiable but it's the first year we've had major problems so stop saying the system is shit. It is hundreds of times better than having the 7 and 8 at capacity for hours on end, even the 22 was bad for numerous hours having all the kids from Cameron going to school and coming home from school and the kids from KCI doing the same. Yes grade separation and a subway would obviously be better but those cost incrementally more money and at the time we didn't have the ability to spend more money on it as has been said numerous times on this forum by numerous people. So just be thankful we have a half decent rapid transit system. |