Waterloo Region Connected
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version

+- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com)
+-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 02-23-2023

(02-17-2023, 11:05 PM)nms Wrote: I don’t understand. The process of coupling is more involved than one might assume, or a coupled pair has to do extra work before starting every time? By “in the coupling”, do you mean standing on the track between the 2 coupled vehicles?

If the latter, that’s stupid. The system is eventually supposed to operate routinely with coupled pairs, and the main reason for doing so is to avoid paying more drivers when increasing capacity. Whatever they will do when it operates routinely they should be able to do now. Enough with the safety paranoia.

I mean the process of getting them coupled while in service is complicated. Every pair of trains has to be parked and individually visited by LRV Maintenance while other trains bypass them. Once they're coupled, Control gives the two operators specific instructions. The operator of the rear train sits in the front cab and monitors the coupling. Before every station departure, they have to visually confirm there isn't anybody in the coupling area and relay this to the operator of the front train, who then has to explicitly confirm they heard before proceeding.

I don't think there has been any actual freezing rain yet. Two LRVs are stuck in Kitchener due to switching issues. And CN is sending a freight train soon.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - taylortbb - 02-23-2023

Spotted a double train

   

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 02-23-2023

Interesting to hear that so far nothing is stuck directly due to weather (I think).

I was just shoveling random sidewalks, finishing an elderly lady's before I came in since she was out in this mess. It didn't really feel like ice or freezing rain. It was more tiny little balls of snowy ice...not wet enough to coat things (wires, trees). Easy to move and maybe due to that lack of icy build up, perhaps the trains will be more or less running.

Hope these workers are getting good compensation for being up all night in this and working round the clock.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 02-23-2023

I heard earlier they plan to run "ice trains" throughout the night. Looks like all the freezing rain missed us though.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 02-23-2023

(02-23-2023, 12:05 AM)Bob_McBob Wrote:
(02-17-2023, 11:05 PM)nms Wrote: I don’t understand. The process of coupling is more involved than one might assume, or a coupled pair has to do extra work before starting every time? By “in the coupling”, do you mean standing on the track between the 2 coupled vehicles?

If the latter, that’s stupid. The system is eventually supposed to operate routinely with coupled pairs, and the main reason for doing so is to avoid paying more drivers when increasing capacity. Whatever they will do when it operates routinely they should be able to do now. Enough with the safety paranoia.

I mean the process of getting them coupled while in service is complicated. Every pair of trains has to be parked and individually visited by LRV Maintenance while other trains bypass them. Once they're coupled, Control gives the two operators specific instructions. The operator of the rear train sits in the front cab and monitors the coupling. Before every station departure, they have to visually confirm there isn't anybody in the coupling area and relay this to the operator of the front train, who then has to explicitly confirm they heard before proceeding.

I still don’t get it. First you say that the answer to my question is the first alternative: “I mean the process of getting them coupled while in service is complicated.” Then you say that they have to do something before every station departure, which is the second alternative: “ Before every station departure…”. So it sounds like the answer to my question is, in effect, “both”.

So what is the plan when we routinely run pairs of trains? The reason for double trains is to save on labour costs compared to running them singly: the system can easily handle trains every 5 minutes in each direction, and could go more frequently than that with some adjustments to the operation of the crossing protection systems.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 02-23-2023

(02-23-2023, 08:32 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(02-23-2023, 12:05 AM)Bob_McBob Wrote: I mean the process of getting them coupled while in service is complicated. Every pair of trains has to be parked and individually visited by LRV Maintenance while other trains bypass them. Once they're coupled, Control gives the two operators specific instructions. The operator of the rear train sits in the front cab and monitors the coupling. Before every station departure, they have to visually confirm there isn't anybody in the coupling area and relay this to the operator of the front train, who then has to explicitly confirm they heard before proceeding.

I still don’t get it. First you say that the answer to my question is the first alternative: “I mean the process of getting them coupled while in service is complicated.” Then you say that they have to do something before every station departure, which is the second alternative: “ Before every station departure…”. So it sounds like the answer to my question is, in effect, “both”.

So what is the plan when we routinely run pairs of trains? The reason for double trains is to save on labour costs compared to running them singly: the system can easily handle trains every 5 minutes in each direction, and could go more frequently than that with some adjustments to the operation of the crossing protection systems.

Indeed...that seems like yet another safety insanity policy on our system (just like running trains at 10km/h for two blocks, or running trains 10km/h below the speed limit between lanes of speeding traffic).

The problem with safety is that we are unwilling to actually make meaningful changes in safety. 95% of the incidents involving the LRT involve drivers failing to obey signage or signals. We could stop probably 10-15% of the collisions with the LRVs by restricting cross traffic at a handful of redundant intersections (Agnes, St., Mt. Hope., Pine St.). Instead we do nonsense like this.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 02-23-2023

Meanwhile in India you can couple a train while the engineer stands inches from it and immediately gets between the two while a whole crowd watches: https://youtu.be/SSHuv_7s9TY?t=88

Sometimes we have way too much obsession with safety over here. And that's why people ignore it very often which is a contradictory effect. I was at a job site recently atop a very tall building. Technically we're supposed to harness in and all that. Do you think that always happens? Unless you're about to stand on the edge of a beam, people will ignore it. But at least we're not doing stunts like this anymore even tho that is extremely based.

Trains are extremely dangerous tho and in bad weather like that it's expected they'll be careful coupling trains. I've done freight train hopping across a bit of the country and it's wild how much sheer power trains have. When you're sitting behind a shipping container on an intermodal going at high speeds you really get a sense of what you're dealing with.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 02-23-2023

(02-23-2023, 11:16 AM)ac3r Wrote: Meanwhile in India you can couple a train while the engineer stands inches from it and immediately gets between the two while a whole crowd watches: https://youtu.be/SSHuv_7s9TY?t=88

Sometimes we have way too much obsession with safety over here. And that's why people ignore it very often which is a contradictory effect. I was at a job site recently atop a very tall building. Technically we're supposed to harness in and all that. Do you think that always happens? Unless you're about to stand on the edge of a beam, people will ignore it. But at least we're not doing stunts like this anymore even tho that is extremely based.

Trains are extremely dangerous tho and in bad weather like that it's expected they'll be careful coupling trains. I've done freight train hopping across a bit of the country and it's wild how much sheer power trains have. When you're sitting behind a shipping container on an intermodal going at high speeds you really get a sense of what you're dealing with.

Good ‘ol link-and-pin, along with the huge buffers perfectly made for squishing someone flat. That’s an area where modern coupling systems are definitely better. I don’t think I want to go back to the older coupling systems. Now dinner on a beam… that might be fun! Smile

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 02-23-2023

(02-23-2023, 02:41 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: Now dinner on a beam… that might be fun! Smile

Modern workers regularly recreate the famous Lunch atop a skyscraper photograph! It must be a fun thing to do. Of course they're all harnessed in these days (rightfully so). I'm not afraid of heights but when I'm up on a building for work, it's still a bit nerve-wracking when you look down and realize you're hundreds of feet in the air. Psychologically it's a totally different experience than being inside a completed building on the 50th floor, as opposed to standing on the top of something still under construction. You know you can't fall (well, you'd hope) but looking down you're still like "yikes".

It seems that back in those days, people got quite a rush from doing ridiculously dangerous tasks on skyscrapers. Fine dining, sword fights, performative dance and just dangling on cranes and cables. These days you'd be fired and probably charged haha. You usually can't even hold a tool when you're that high up unless it's strapped to you, since obviously you don't want it to fall on someone's head. Back then nobody cared, you could just sit on a beam with your lunchbox, a thermos with tea and take a break. Wasn't even that long ago it was still acceptable to not use any safety measures. Fred Dibnah was a famous steeplejack who also got into demolishing old chimneys. This is a fascinating short clip of him knocking down a huge chimney at an old mill, all by hand, brick by brick. No harness...nothing. He'd climb the ladders (which he installed himself, section by section and were only attached with some rope) with a sledgehammer and just wack bricks apart while standing on wooden planks that were held in by nothing by a few spikes he hammered into the bricks and tied with rope. A total different breed of man. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKPApAsJbj4

Some fascinating images: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2920453/Laughing-face-death-Incredible-pictures-construction-workers-fooling-built-America-s-iconic-buildings.html

[Image: XrQJt75.jpg]

Don't mean to hijack the thread, I just find the old days fascinating.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 02-27-2023

If anyone wants to check it the deicing procedure, they're set up to do it at Waterloo Public Square Station again.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 02-27-2023

"...please be advised, trains are starting to get some power issues..."

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 02-27-2023

At least one LRV reporting total power loss. Signals are starting to have issues too; Block Line Station arms have been down for 10+ minutes.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 02-27-2023

509 about to go into service equipped with a scraper.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bob_McBob - 02-28-2023

504 and 509 coupled, same procedure as before. They will be running trains all night to break up ice.

RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - taylortbb - 03-01-2023

The Record is now covering the disruption from freezing rain, https://archive.is/lcZN4 . It's a Terry Pender article, not an Outhit one, so I think it's fair. There's legitimate questions that need to be answered, but it also fairly represents it as well used and reliable in other seasons. Apparently there's a report on the issues coming to regional council in early March, presumably the March 7 planning and works committee meeting.