ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-13-2020 (12-13-2020, 12:46 PM)westwardloo Wrote: As much as I hate the observers anti LRT cartoons. I grew up in Elmira, and I understand their point. I do think that a by-pass is needed. Downtown Elmira hasn't been a good destination for shopping in my lifetime, but it is made even worse by the constant tractor trailer traffic zooming through it. Obviously this would divert some traffic from Arthur Street that might stop and shop, but I would hazard a guess most people shopping in downtown Elmira are from Elmira or the surrounding farms. I certainly support a bypass but I got the sense the opposition to a bypass was strictly within Elmira. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bytor - 12-13-2020 (12-13-2020, 02:19 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(12-13-2020, 12:46 PM)westwardloo Wrote: As much as I hate the observers anti LRT cartoons. I grew up in Elmira, and I understand their point. I do think that a by-pass is needed. Downtown Elmira hasn't been a good destination for shopping in my lifetime, but it is made even worse by the constant tractor trailer traffic zooming through it. Obviously this would divert some traffic from Arthur Street that might stop and shop, but I would hazard a guess most people shopping in downtown Elmira are from Elmira or the surrounding farms. Well, look what the Charles/Duke loop did to DTK. That may only have been the straw that broke the camel's back, but we're still recovering from it today. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 12-13-2020 (12-13-2020, 03:40 PM)Bytor Wrote:(12-13-2020, 02:19 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I certainly support a bypass but I got the sense the opposition to a bypass was strictly within Elmira. The city was considering ways to rejuvenate the downtown long before they made Charles and Duke into one-way streets. It sure didn't help but that was not the root of the issue -- suburban sprawl and shopping malls were a much bigger factor in the original decline. And, as we have seen, once the downward spiral starts, it's awfully hard to reverse. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - trainspotter139 - 12-14-2020 (12-11-2020, 11:51 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(12-11-2020, 11:23 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Wishful thinking? There's nothing wrong with the track there that is limiting the speed. It is, in fact, entirely based on the limitations of ATP. ATP is entirely limited by the human driver factor. Had we gone with an ATC system (which is much more expensive to implement) like what is being done on Line 5 Eglinton in Toronto that large section of crawling along at 15 km/h wouldn't exist since ATC essentially drives the train in ATC enabled sections. The curve speed limit for the Hayward section is 15 km/h. With ATC the system could calculate in real time and then implement the required braking to get the train to decelerate to 15 km/h before a point about 15m before entering the curve. ATP, since it's entirely dependent on human factors, requires a large buffer zone before the start of where speed restrictions are required to account for a driver failing to acknowledge the speed limit change, penalty grace period and potential subsequent penalty braking. The larger the change in speed limit, the larger that buffer zone must be. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-14-2020 (12-14-2020, 03:57 AM)trainspotter139 Wrote:(12-11-2020, 11:51 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: Maybe there is something wrong with the track? It’s hard to imagine what would require such an extreme slowdown. I don't think I buy this explanation...the 15 km/h section starts a minute before the curve...we have lots of other turns which don't have similar ridiculous restrictions. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 12-14-2020 (12-14-2020, 10:34 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I don't think I buy this explanation...the 15 km/h section starts a minute before the curve...we have lots of other turns which don't have similar ridiculous restrictions. Are the turns with non-ridiculous speed limits in Line-Of-Sight (LOS) areas? I have no idea, I’m just wondering if that might be the difference. It doesn’t really matter, because even if there is a reason that means they can’t just simply fix it, it still doesn’t justify it, because it is ridiculous for the train to have to go as slow as it does. This is similar to the O-Train “can’t operate with doors open even in an emergency without going back to 1800s scheduling technology” problem; regardless of the technical details, it’s ridiculous that they have such a problem. In both cases, whatever the detailed technical explanation, it just means the designers screwed up earlier in the process. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-14-2020 (12-14-2020, 02:36 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(12-14-2020, 10:34 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I don't think I buy this explanation...the 15 km/h section starts a minute before the curve...we have lots of other turns which don't have similar ridiculous restrictions. I'm thinking of the turn from Waterloo Park onto Caroline Rd. it's also moving from an ATP section to an on road section, now, the speed restriction is higher because it is a wider turn, but the speed restriction doesn't start hundreds of meters (yes, hundreds, I measured) away from the intersection as it does at Hayward. I will also take this opportunity to once again argue that the LRT should have continued along the freight railway, to a grade separated station at Block Line, then turned towards the hydro corridor between the car dealership and the mattress place. While they were at it, they could have built segregated bike lanes and a sidewalk on Courtland, as well as a trail from Block line to Balzer Rd, as well as connecting to the back of the towers on Fallowfield cutting 600 meters off their walk to the LRT station. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - westwardloo - 12-14-2020 (12-13-2020, 03:40 PM)Bytor Wrote:Obviously hard to know who is actually against the bypass. Anecdotally, speaking with people I know that own businesses downtown Elmira would love a by-pass. I think it has been put on the back burner do to it being a regional issue, if the township had the ability to build this they would have done it ages ago.(12-13-2020, 02:19 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I certainly support a bypass but I got the sense the opposition to a bypass was strictly within Elmira. Not sure if you have been downtown Elmira recently, but the camel's back already broke decades ago. I think traffic bypassing the downtown would have a minimum, if any effect on overall sales. Obviously a much nicer of a town, but St. Jacobs downtown has definitely seen the benefits of reduced tracker trailer traffic zooming down the main street. Sorry to go off topic slightly. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 12-14-2020 (12-14-2020, 03:05 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(12-14-2020, 02:36 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: Are the turns with non-ridiculous speed limits in Line-Of-Sight (LOS) areas? I have no idea, I’m just wondering if that might be the difference. Thanks for the example. That one had a slow area ahead of it at the switch for a while, but it seems to have been fixed and I agree it’s much more reasonable — it still looks pretty slow, but the slowness has some connection to the conditions we can observe. I have no idea whether the fact that the turn itself is in the LOS area affects how they handle it. Quote:I will also take this opportunity to once again argue that the LRT should have continued along the freight railway, to a grade separated station at Block Line, then turned towards the hydro corridor between the car dealership and the mattress place. While they were at it, they could have built segregated bike lanes and a sidewalk on Courtland, as well as a trail from Block line to Balzer Rd, as well as connecting to the back of the towers on Fallowfield cutting 600 meters off their walk to the LRT station. That does sound like a good idea — eliminate the jog at Hayward (with its 2 sharp turns), not to mention the crossings associated with Graybar and the pedestrian crossing at the corner with Courtland, as well as the crossing at Blockline and the crossings associated with the businesses between Courtland and the tracks. And eventually the station could essentially be in the Virerra Village basement, which would be really slick! RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinT - 12-21-2020 (12-14-2020, 03:05 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I will also take this opportunity to once again argue that the LRT should have continued along the freight railway, to a grade separated station at Block Line, then turned towards the hydro corridor between the car dealership and the mattress place. While they were at it, they could have built segregated bike lanes and a sidewalk on Courtland, as well as a trail from Block line to Balzer Rd, as well as connecting to the back of the towers on Fallowfield cutting 600 meters off their walk to the LRT station. I daydream about this every time I ride through that section. What a wasted opportunity... RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bytor - 12-21-2020 (12-21-2020, 07:28 AM)KevinT Wrote:(12-14-2020, 03:05 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I will also take this opportunity to once again argue that the LRT should have continued along the freight railway, to a grade separated station at Block Line, then turned towards the hydro corridor between the car dealership and the mattress place. While they were at it, they could have built segregated bike lanes and a sidewalk on Courtland, as well as a trail from Block line to Balzer Rd, as well as connecting to the back of the towers on Fallowfield cutting 600 meters off their walk to the LRT station. That would have been a bad route, IMO. Think of the work necessary to get accessible stairs and a ramp down to the bottom of the corridor for a station there. Also, the nearest track at the bottom is a bit more than 90m from the current station platform, straight line distance, so a switchback ramp and stairs at AODA maximum grade would potentially double that distance. That would add a couple minutes to get to the station for healthy people, more for people with mobility issues, and thus reduce the catchment area on the other side of Courtland Ave., not to mention how it makes transferring to and from busses less convenient, too. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-21-2020 (12-21-2020, 02:39 PM)Bytor Wrote:(12-21-2020, 07:28 AM)KevinT Wrote: I daydream about this every time I ride through that section. What a wasted opportunity... And the station would have been closer to the buildings at Fallowfield, and Homer Watson. As for "the work necessary"...this is the same work that's needed at every single grade separated station everywhere in the world. I will be the first one to argue for ground level stations, they do provide better integration into the pedestrian realm, but in this instance, you're looking at a savings of 4-6 minutes travel time, plus a better street level realm (the current Courtland route is utter trash--partly because of the LRT routing), plus a trade off of better connections to some places, and worse connections to other places, seems like a very strong win. Also, I question some of your numbers, the track in question is only 74 meters from the current station access (remember, street level design is trash), and the bridge pier is only 65 meters. And even if AODA ramps required a switchback (which they don't have, too, they could be accessed by elevator instead) most grade separated stations also have stairs which can be much shorter. So you're really looking at a 65-70 meter further walk, plus stairs, and again, that's added to the Courtland side, but subtracted from the Fallowfield side. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - neonjoe - 12-21-2020 A station in the middle of a rail yard would be a lovely place to wait for a train. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 12-21-2020 (12-21-2020, 08:46 PM)neonjoe Wrote: A station in the middle of a rail yard would be a lovely place to wait for a train. It would not be in the middle. It would be at the side and in that regard not really any different from the existing Block Line station, which is at the side of (“in the middle of”) a busy 4 lane road. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-21-2020 (12-21-2020, 08:46 PM)neonjoe Wrote: A station in the middle of a rail yard would be a lovely place to wait for a train. You prefer 25 feet above a rail yard beside two massive five lane highways. Honestly, I’ve waited at a station abutting a rail yard before, it really isn’t unpleasant at all. |