ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 12-01-2020 Transit oriented development is a good thing, but it has to be balanced and planned right. So far, this region is not doing that. From what I've seen, I've mostly witnessed this as "let's build a fancy LRT and hope big condos and boutiques open up along the route so the city looks good". It's gentrifying the areas along the LRT but the region is not providing low income housing and adequate transportation to blue collar jobs that are not exactly near the LRT. We're pushing low income people further and further away from the core of the city (there are literally homeless people living in the forests of Hidden Valley next to multi-million dollar homes because we keep kicking them to the curb). Poor people are not necessarily benefitting from this form of development and that should be a serious concern of every citizen. https://www.objectifliberte.fr/2010/03/dans-quelle-ville-voulons-nous-vivre-demain.html [in French] https://www.frbsf.org/community-development/publications/community-investments/2010/august/transit-oriented-development-low-moderate-income-communities/ https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/eastsats/4/1/4_194/_pdf/-char/en https://community-wealth.org/sites/clone.community-wealth.org/files/downloads/tool-policylink-TOD.pdf RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 12-01-2020 I don’t like the framing that LRT is “not built to carry people”. It is true that it is not built to carry existing demand, which is still well within the range that can be handled by buses. But the way it promotes intensification is by providing the ability to move people efficiently. If that is social engineering, then so is building huge wide roads and expressways all over the place. The difference is that a public transit system can actually move everybody affordably, whereas a road system will have more trouble doing that. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 10:15 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: It is true that it is not built to carry existing demand, which is still well within the range that can be handled by buses. It is definitely able to handle the demand. The thing is empty half of the time, even before SARS-CoV-2 disrupted everything. According to Keolis the LRT only carries 25'000 people per day on average. In terms of a rapid transit system (and specifically one that is serving a region of over 600'000+ people! - Nürnberg, Germany for example, is roughly the same size as us even even denser yet it has 3 subway lines, 5 streetcar/LRT lines, 4 S-bahn lines and a million bus routes) it's so far an absolute failure in terms of ridership. Even that number is quite ambiguous since they only announced that in a recent press release in regards to the ION winning a national award. Will ridership go up? I have no doubt, but it's reaching veeeeeeerrryyy far to paint the ION as an astounding success. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 10:26 PM)ac3r Wrote:(12-01-2020, 10:15 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: It is true that it is not built to carry existing demand, which is still well within the range that can be handled by buses. The LRT has been an unambiguous success in terms of ridership--before COVID--it was exceeding all ridership targets. It not being full, does not make it a failure. Nurnberg Germany is a completely different city, it is entirely unfair to compare a city like that to our city which has just built it's first rapid transit line, that was operating only a year. Saying it's a failure because 100,000 people didn't sell their cars the moment it was built is absurd, change takes time, but that change was happening far more rapidly as a result of the LRT than it was before, and more, it was happening faster than it was expected to as a result of the LRT. (12-01-2020, 10:15 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: If that is social engineering, then so is building huge wide roads and expressways all over the place. The difference is that a public transit system can actually move everybody affordably, whereas a road system will have more trouble doing that. This is incredibly on point. Anyone who thinks that building transit is a social experiment is missing the petri dish for the cars...mass motorization has been an enormous and incredibly harmful social experiement. Yet so many people see car dependency as the natural order of things and not an bizarre 70 year old abberation from a 7,000 year old normal. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 10:34 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(12-01-2020, 10:26 PM)ac3r Wrote: It is definitely able to handle the demand. The thing is empty half of the time, even before SARS-CoV-2 disrupted everything. According to Keolis the LRT only carries 25'000 people per day on average. In terms of a rapid transit system (and specifically one that is serving a region of over 600'000+ people! - Nürnberg, Germany for example, is roughly the same size as us even even denser yet it has 3 subway lines, 5 streetcar/LRT lines, 4 S-bahn lines and a million bus routes) it's so far an absolute failure in terms of ridership. Even that number is quite ambiguous since they only announced that in a recent press release in regards to the ION winning a national award. Will ridership go up? I have no doubt, but it's reaching veeeeeeerrryyy far to paint the ION as an astounding success. Targets set by who, though? Targets don't mean much when they're made by the same business owners and politicians hoping to sell you a product. I could care less if the region and GranLinq set a random target and keep moving the goal post to make it sound like it was a resounding success. Now, I'm not hating on the ION in any way, I am very glad it was built - I hate cars and I wish we could get most places in the city without having to rely on one. I've worked for the Region of Waterloo on architectural and urban planning projects so I love the fact we finally did this because in many ways it has benefitted people. But it was under construction for years and yet the ridership isn't all that much more significant than it was when we only had the 7 and various iXpress routes doing more or less the exact same route. It's as slow as a worm trying to crawl across a sidewalk on a sunny day in July and it only covers a very very specific corridor of the city and is ultimately not that much faster than the bus routes it replaced - for me, it takes me less time to take the 8 downtown as it does the LRT and the route is almost virtually the same in terms of distance. Most importantly, it has yet to do anything meaningful in regards to developing affordable housing and access to employers. Yeah it's easy to say "well don't worry, it's still new, the poor will love it one day" but people who live pay cheque to pay cheque don't give a shit how easy it might be to get to work in 5-10 years. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ZEBuilder - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 10:26 PM)ac3r Wrote:(12-01-2020, 10:15 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: It is true that it is not built to carry existing demand, which is still well within the range that can be handled by buses. With that statment I doubt you've ridden it in the morning then. I know last year before covid happened the train was packed once you got to Block Line station going towards downtown and that was at 7:30 yes it starts to trail off in the middle of the day but at lunch theres a fair amount of people on it whenever I see it. You can't expect it to have astronomical ridership values in its first year and a year where Covid complicated everything, and you also can't compare it to Nurnberg since it has a bunch more lines. Would you really expect them to have the ridership they have now when they only had there first line no because it takes time for people to see it as a viable option. The ION spurred lots of development which means there are going to be more people in the region and resultingly more people who will see it as a viable option which means ridership will increase it's just a basic cause and effect cycle. It just takes time for people to see it as a option but the ridership values you're evidently looking for will come it just takes time. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 10:14 PM)ac3r Wrote: Transit oriented development is a good thing, but it has to be balanced and planned right. So far, this region is not doing that. From what I've seen, I've mostly witnessed this as "let's build a fancy LRT and hope big condos and boutiques open up along the route so the city looks good". It's gentrifying the areas along the LRT but the region is not providing low income housing and adequate transportation to blue collar jobs that are not exactly near the LRT. There is no doubt that we have a shortage of affordable housing. But I think that blaming that on the LRT is disingenuous. We had a housing shortage and we have one now. And having more mid-market rental housing (Drewlo, Market Flats, Ophelia, The Scott, 66 Civic) will tend to ease the pressure on rents, even if the units themselves are mostly not in the affordable range. Even investor condos help relieve the rental housing shortage. And the region (and at least Kitchener) are making real efforts to create more affordable housing. Much work remains, but the problem is not being ignored. But that's really nothing to do with LRT. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 11:01 PM)ac3r Wrote:(12-01-2020, 10:34 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: The LRT has been an unambiguous success in terms of ridership--before COVID--it was exceeding all ridership targets. This is a very bizarre argument. The targets weren't set by business owners, nor were they set by politicians. They were set by staff and consultants based on growth models. As for targets, you'll find I'm the first to call bullshit on a lot of the well bullshit that I hear from planners, but generally people try to over promise to justify building something, not under promise as has happened here. I am also not one to shy away from pointing out the faults in our system here, but the ridership complaints are frankly, not at all justified. When the ridership numbers were released they were comfortably beyond my expectations. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 11:14 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(12-01-2020, 10:14 PM)ac3r Wrote: Transit oriented development is a good thing, but it has to be balanced and planned right. So far, this region is not doing that. From what I've seen, I've mostly witnessed this as "let's build a fancy LRT and hope big condos and boutiques open up along the route so the city looks good". It's gentrifying the areas along the LRT but the region is not providing low income housing and adequate transportation to blue collar jobs that are not exactly near the LRT. This is entirely on point, if we hadn't built the LRT the only difference would be the unaffordable housing would have been built in Breslau instead of in the core. Here it just makes it more on display. It's also the case that there are sections of the LRT that do have access to lower income housing, Block Line station being a key example of this. The other thing that's always missed about this is that transportation is almost always the second biggest expense. The last thing someone who is unable to find affordable housing needs to be told is that they would need to buy a car in order to live somewhere. The LRT is not the only transit investment we've made, the entire network has been expanded as well (or at least that was the pre-COVID plan....which seems now to be out the window). RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - trainspotter139 - 12-02-2020 (12-01-2020, 10:26 PM)ac3r Wrote:I have posted this in here before but since we're talking about Pre-COVID numbers then perhaps this graph from the 2020 Budget discussions would be appropriate. If your claim were at all true, these orange bars would be much, much smaller than they are. It's important to understand the size of the vehicle can be deceptive at times. Especially if one is only observing a vehicle between Northfield and Conestoga Stations.(12-01-2020, 10:15 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: It is true that it is not built to carry existing demand, which is still well within the range that can be handled by buses. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 12-02-2020 (12-01-2020, 11:01 PM)ac3r Wrote:(12-01-2020, 10:34 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: It not being full, does not make it a failure. Nurnberg Germany is a completely different city, it is entirely unfair to compare a city like that to our city which has just built it's first rapid transit line, that was operating only a year. Indeed, a transit system which is, on average, half full is doing very well at using its capacity efficiently. Compare that to the road network, which probably has an overall utilization of maybe — I’m guessing — 5%. Consider all those wide neighbourhood streets which are essentially deserted overnight and which even during rush hour only have a few dozen vehicles go through as residents arrive or leave; and even major roads are nearly empty much of the day. Based on the graph somebody else posted, the LRT is doing very well at being used efficiently — it tops out at near capacity, and is over half usage for many hours of the day, only tailing off near the beginning and end of service. Some commuter services top out at around 50% usage because they basically just take people into the city in the morning and out in the afternoon; GO used to be mostly like this, although it’s getting better. What we’re seeing with the LRT is almost as far from a commuter service as is possible. This discussion reminds me of a poorly informed proposal I saw around the time of the LRT debate from somebody who just wanted to buy a bunch of buses. They were proposing — no kidding! — 5 different sizes of vehicles, essentially to ensure that no transit vehicle ever drove across the city at less than full capacity. Of course, they were completely ignoring the 0% capacity on any vehicle that is parked in the garage, not to mention numerous other problems associated with such a diverse fleet. Quote:… It's as slow as a worm trying to crawl across a sidewalk on a sunny day in July …. This part is true. I and others have already complained about this. I’m not sure if we need to wait for less paranoid system managers to fix this or if there are external rules the transit system operator is forced to follow which enforce the paranoia. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jamincan - 12-02-2020 For people who don't live in KW, or who have only come here recently, it's tempting to look at ION in isolation - that is commonly how transit is planned elsewhere, after all. The thing with ION, though, is that it was a ground up comprehensive urban planning process. In brief, the justification grew out of transportation models that predicted unsustainable levels of investment in road construction in order to support projected growth. The plan was the creation of the so-called central transit corridor and the development of a comprehensive strategy involving economic development, zoning changes, and transit changes that all worked together to support more growth in that core area. ION is the most visible result in that process, but it is only one part of it. Looking solely at ION without understanding any of that broader context is like looking only at the engine of a car and pronouncing it a failure or success solely on its power without considering its purpose. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bytor - 12-02-2020 (12-01-2020, 10:15 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: It is true that it is not built to carry existing demand, which is still well within the range that can be handled by buses. No it wasn't. A thousand times no. Between the 200 and 7 there were busses an average of every 3 minutes in rush hour before ION took over, and they were still overcrowded and frequently late. That is not "well within the range that can be handled by busses". RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Bytor - 12-02-2020 (12-01-2020, 10:26 PM)ac3r Wrote: It is definitely able to handle the demand. The thing is empty half of the time, even before SARS-CoV-2 disrupted everything. According to Keolis the LRT only carries 25'000 people per day on average. Except it wasn't "empty half the time". It couldn't have been carrying 25,000 riders a day—20% more than what the 7+200 carried together before—if it were empty. Did you think that ION was going to jump to 100% capacity right away? That's just ridiculous, because if it did that means we waited far too long to put it in place. Of course it's going to start off on the lower end and grow from there, like if you had promoted a busPlus route to a full route and switched the short bus of 20 passengers to a regular bus of 80 passengers. Even with only 30 people aboard, 1/8th capacity, ION is probably still going to be cheaper to operate per ride than a bus route carrying 20,000 people a day. In fact, I bet you that an analysis of IONs operational cost carrying 25,000 per day on average will show that it costs less per ride to operate than the old iXpress 200 cost at 7,000 riders per day. (12-01-2020, 10:26 PM)ac3r Wrote: In terms of a rapid transit system (and specifically one that is serving a region of over 600'000+ people! - Nürnberg, Germany for example, is roughly the same size as us even even denser yet it has 3 subway lines, 5 streetcar/LRT lines, 4 S-bahn lines and a million bus routes) it's so far an absolute failure in terms of ridership. Even that number is quite ambiguous since they only announced that in a recent press release in regards to the ION winning a national award. Will ridership go up? I have no doubt, but it's reaching veeeeeeerrryyy far to paint the ION as an astounding success. It is an astounding success. GRT boardings all across the system were up 17%. Central Transit Corridor boardings were up 40%. The IO, if it has 25,000/day, carries more than three times as many people per day, on average, as the iXpress 200 did. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 12-02-2020 Indeed, on labour cost alone the savings are dramatic - far fewer operators and maintenance staff are needed for the LRVs compared to equivalent capacity in the bus fleet. Then you get into savings on fuel cost, vehicle depreciation, and tons of other factors. |