ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - trainspotter139 - 11-29-2020 (11-27-2020, 10:28 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: I read an article which said that any train with a door that wouldn’t close would be locked out by the ATP (automatic train protection) and could only be moved under old-school procedures essentially involving written authorization to use sections of track. 1. I think you are mixing up ATP with ATC. ATP is just a signaling system that compares train speed with permitted speed and signals the train control computer for brake activation if the train speed is above the permitted speed. ATC takes control over acceleration and braking and works in conjunction with ATP to operate the train safely. 2. That's not an engineering fail at all. All modern passenger trains have a door interlock braking system. When the doors are open, the brakes are activated. When the doors close properly the brakes are then deactivated. If the doors do not close properly, the door interlock brake stays active. ATC is a completely separate hardware module that simply sends commands to and receives data inputs from the train control computer. ATC doesn't get a signal as to why the brakes are active. All ATC gets from the train control computer is basically: "Brakes: Active, Position: Service-50%, Locked: True". ATC would operate in the same fashion if the operator hit the emergency stop switch on the control panel. All ATC would know from that is: "Brakes: Active, Position: Emergency, Locked: True". ATC can only control the train if the controls aren't locked out by another module with higher control priority, like the emergency stop switch or door interlock brake. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 11-29-2020 (11-29-2020, 07:10 PM)trainspotter139 Wrote: 1. I think you are mixing up ATP with ATC. ATP is just a signaling system that compares train speed with permitted speed and signals the train control computer for brake activation if the train speed is above the permitted speed. ATC takes control over acceleration and braking and works in conjunction with ATP to operate the train safely. I think you’re right. It’s been a while since I read the article; most likely it referred to ATC. Quote:2. That's not an engineering fail at all. All modern passenger trains have a door interlock braking system. When the doors are open, the brakes are activated. When the doors close properly the brakes are then deactivated. If the doors do not close properly, the door interlock brake stays active. ATC is a completely separate hardware module that simply sends commands to and receives data inputs from the train control computer. ATC doesn't get a signal as to why the brakes are active. All ATC gets from the train control computer is basically: "Brakes: Active, Position: Service-50%, Locked: True". ATC would operate in the same fashion if the operator hit the emergency stop switch on the control panel. All ATC would know from that is: "Brakes: Active, Position: Emergency, Locked: True". ATC can only control the train if the controls aren't locked out by another module with higher control priority, like the emergency stop switch or door interlock brake. It is an engineering fail for a door problem to absolutely prevent operation of the train. To be clear, there are multiple possible scenarios. Say the door is stuck and won’t close; either at all or completely. Depending on the exact situation, either the vehicle should be evacuated and then driven to the OMSF, or kept in service until the end of the line (or wherever) with a temporary barrier across the door (and the door excluded from normal open/close operation). In either scenario, there needs to be a procedure to inform ATC that the door is locked out and to ignore what it is saying. Another possible scenario is the door closes fine, but the device which detects the state of the door has failed and always reports that it is open. In this scenario especially it is obviously totally absurd for the vehicle not to be able to operate. Even with the current malengineered situation, the train can be operated; it just needs written track authority. So presumably there is a way of disengaging the brakes even while the door is still reporting that it is open (I don’t think typical train motive power is capable of moving the train against a fully-applied brake, even if the control system would allow an attempt). Again, a door problem is not a legitimate reason to require going back to 1800s technology. In fact, I can’t think of much that would; besides the obvious failure of part of the ATC itself, something like total brake failure maybe; except that then the vehicle would have to be towed or pushed, and in that case it would be nice if ATC could still be able to operate the helper vehicle. This is not the first time I have heard of clearly wrong design related to doors. My understanding is that some subway trains, I think including the TTC’s Toronto Rockets, have the following procedure when an obstruction prevents a door from closing: all doors re-open and repeat the closing sequence. If they fail 3 times, the train is out of service. This is totally absurd. What should happen is that only the obstructed door should re-open. This means instead of requiring 24 doors to successfully close simultaneously, maybe 23 close on the first try and the remaining one re-opens and then closes. So right away this would eliminate most of the problems. Next, the basic idea of 3 failures requiring taking the train out of service is OK; if there is an equipment failure, at some point it needs to be dealt with. But if the reason is identified as “some idiot kept sticking their foot in the door”, then there is no equipment failure (not even a suspicion of a failure) and no point in taking the train out of service. What, they’ll take it back to the yard, and do … what? It’s fine; there was just somebody blocking it. I think safety engineers need to step back more often and consider whether the behaviour they are creating is reasonable. I’m not asking for them to design unsafe systems, but the above examples just don’t pass the smell test. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - tomh009 - 11-29-2020 (11-29-2020, 09:45 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: This is not the first time I have heard of clearly wrong design related to doors. My understanding is that some subway trains, I think including the TTC’s Toronto Rockets, have the following procedure when an obstruction prevents a door from closing: all doors re-open and repeat the closing sequence. If they fail 3 times, the train is out of service. This is totally absurd. What should happen is that only the obstructed door should re-open. This means instead of requiring 24 doors to successfully close simultaneously, maybe 23 close on the first try and the remaining one re-opens and then closes. So right away this would eliminate most of the problems. This is the way every urban train (that I can think of) works: all the doors open and close in unison. One won't close? All doors will reopen and attempt to close again. I am not an expert in this, though, so I don't know why this logic is used. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jamincan - 11-30-2020 (11-29-2020, 09:58 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(11-29-2020, 09:45 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: This is not the first time I have heard of clearly wrong design related to doors. My understanding is that some subway trains, I think including the TTC’s Toronto Rockets, have the following procedure when an obstruction prevents a door from closing: all doors re-open and repeat the closing sequence. If they fail 3 times, the train is out of service. This is totally absurd. What should happen is that only the obstructed door should re-open. This means instead of requiring 24 doors to successfully close simultaneously, maybe 23 close on the first try and the remaining one re-opens and then closes. So right away this would eliminate most of the problems. It's standard for any system where the doors opening/closing is automatic for obvious reasons. ION is an example that clearly shows that train manufacturers already have the technology to individually control the doors. You end up trading one problem for another, though. Instead of a simpler system where all doors operate simultaneously, you have a more complicated system that could now fail in some other way. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 11-30-2020 (11-30-2020, 07:41 AM)jamincan Wrote: It's standard for any system where the doors opening/closing is automatic for obvious reasons. ION is an example that clearly shows that train manufacturers already have the technology to individually control the doors. You end up trading one problem for another, though. Instead of a simpler system where all doors operate simultaneously, you have a more complicated system that could now fail in some other way. I assume it’s inertia. At one time, it would have been a substantial undertaking to build any sort of independent control into the door system. First you need a way of getting per-door signals from the cabs to the doors; and next unless the individual operation is entirely automatic you need some way of providing controls for each door. But now, with everything computerized, it’s much easier to push all the complexity into software. This doesn’t make the problem disappear entirely, but providing the individual control becomes a coding problem, rather than a whole bunch of additional hardware. One thing I’d like to know: does the cab display show the status of each door individually? I don’t actually know. Although it occurs to me that if the open/close cycle were localized to each door then the overall train could simply have a single open/close command for all doors, even while individual doors can retry on their own. There is no need for a door that won’t close to immediately tell the rest of the train about it — until it’s given up on retrying, it can just signal that it’s still closing and so it will appear as a very slow closing door to the rest of the system. But I’m less sure about this part because I don’t know where the logic to re-open and then try closing again actually is — in the door mechanism or in a central control point. In a modern system it doesn’t matter though. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 11-30-2020 The mention of ION reminds me of another door-related example of maldesign: when the LRT is sitting in station with the doors in “open when button pressed” mode, each door chimes when it closes after letting somebody on or off. This leads to an utterly pointless cacophony. Instead they should close silently. The chime is only useful when the reason the doors are closing is because they are changing to “closed, ready to move” mode. Arguably the chime should also sound just before the doors switch from “ open when button pressed” mode to “closed, ready to move” mode. Additionally, the doors should have different re-opening policies depending on why they’re closing: if they’re closing because enough time has elapsed since the button was pushed, they should re-open like an elevator door: essentially, prioritize letting people through. Only once the doors have been informed to close in preparation for departure should they switch to the more aggressive subway train policy which prioritizes getting the train under way (and then, of course, see previous discussion on allowing each door to have more independence). RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 11-30-2020 (11-30-2020, 08:52 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: The mention of ION reminds me of another door-related example of maldesign: when the LRT is sitting in station with the doors in “open when button pressed” mode, each door chimes when it closes after letting somebody on or off. This leads to an utterly pointless cacophony. Instead they should close silently. The chime is only useful when the reason the doors are closing is because they are changing to “closed, ready to move” mode. Arguably the chime should also sound just before the doors switch from “ open when button pressed” mode to “closed, ready to move” mode. Is this not an accessibility feature to let all people know that the door is closing? I.e., it is about the door closing, not the train departing. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - KevinL - 11-30-2020 Indeed, its primary purpose is to assist the visually impaired so they don't get caught in a closing door. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 11-30-2020 (11-30-2020, 03:14 PM)KevinL Wrote: Indeed, its primary purpose is to assist the visually impaired so they don't get caught in a closing door. And yet somehow elevators get by without it. Or, now that I think about it, do elevators have a closing chime? Even if so, however, it’s not as loud and obtrusive as the LRT chime. The LRT chime is totally fine for departure, it’s just the repeating of it over and over while the LRT is parked which I find to be excessive. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - bgb_ca - 11-30-2020 (11-30-2020, 05:52 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(11-30-2020, 03:14 PM)KevinL Wrote: Indeed, its primary purpose is to assist the visually impaired so they don't get caught in a closing door. Could that possibly be resolved by using the button to open if necessary but control the close from the cab? (Kinda a hybrid of what they do now?) RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - PhilippAchtel - 12-01-2020 (11-29-2020, 09:45 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: Even with the current malengineered situation, the train can be operated; it just needs written track authority. So presumably there is a way of disengaging the brakes even while the door is still reporting that it is open (I don’t think typical train motive power is capable of moving the train against a fully-applied brake, even if the control system would allow an attempt). Again, a door problem is not a legitimate reason to require going back to 1800s technology. In fact, I can’t think of much that would; besides the obvious failure of part of the ATC itself, something like total brake failure maybe; except that then the vehicle would have to be towed or pushed, and in that case it would be nice if ATC could still be able to operate the helper vehicle. There's certainly a way to disable the door interlock to move or tow a vehicle back to the yard for repairs, but it would never be engaged with passengers on board for obvious reasons. You'd never be able or want to tow or operated a train or any other vehicle with its brakes engaged. Brakes are designed purposefully to be much more powerful. But there will also be some mechanism or master switch to manually disengage the emergency or parking brake. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ac3r - 12-01-2020 (11-30-2020, 05:52 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(11-30-2020, 03:14 PM)KevinL Wrote: Indeed, its primary purpose is to assist the visually impaired so they don't get caught in a closing door. Most elevators don't have a chime, but most have sensors in the doors that will reopen them if something obstructs them during the close cycle unless it's an extremely old elevator. Next time an elevator door is closing, wave your hand out and it'll reopen. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 11:28 AM)ac3r Wrote:(11-30-2020, 05:52 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: And yet somehow elevators get by without it. Or, now that I think about it, do elevators have a closing chime? Even if so, however, it’s not as loud and obtrusive as the LRT chime. The LRT chime is totally fine for departure, it’s just the repeating of it over and over while the LRT is parked which I find to be excessive. Most elevators don't have a chime because most elevators are >15 years old. New or refurbished elevators all must include a chime. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - ijmorlan - 12-01-2020 (12-01-2020, 11:13 AM)PhilippAchtel Wrote: There's certainly a way to disable the door interlock to move or tow a vehicle back to the yard for repairs, but it would never be engaged with passengers on board for obvious reasons. I don’t see why an LRT can’t be operated with passengers with a door locked out. If the door can be completely closed and then locked in that position, then just put a sign on it so people know not to use it; if it can’t be 100% completely closed/latched, then install a temporary purpose-designed barrier (basically a tarp with hooks/loops to hold it in position). Depending on the vehicle and train, evacuating one compartment or car could also be an option. But that being said, in Ottawa they don’t just have to offload passengers which I will acknowledge is often a reasonable approach (just put them on the next train; presumably door problems don’t happen so often that many people will be severely inconvenienced); they then have to move the train under written train orders, which is absurd. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - GarthDanlor - 12-01-2020 (11-28-2020, 04:10 PM)tomh009 Wrote: And, whatever the actual numbers, we should remember that the LRT was built not only to carry people but also to promote intensification along its route.Exactly and initially, I think, intensification was expected to be the most important job of the ION. Ridership will continue to develop as a result. By all objective measures, the ION project has led to intensification(and presumably will continue to do so). As for the numbers it pretty hard to gauge success or fail on the the first year of operation especially when part of the year fell during a pandemic.... |