ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Printable Version +- Waterloo Region Connected (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com) +-- Forum: Waterloo Region Works (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure (https://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit (/showthread.php?tid=14) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
|
RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Rainrider22 - 04-30-2020 I am not missing the point. I actually addressed one of your points. You said "there is no legitimate reason whatsoever". I provided you with just one legitimate reason and I am confident there are many more reasons. If you don't like the rules and laws of engagement then advocate for change through the proper channels but don't arbitrarily say that the people are bad at their jobs. I suspect they followed the rules, and built this to conform with the rules to protect the public and the organization they work for. That means they actually did a good job. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-30-2020 I think this is on point. https://www.kitchenertoday.com/police-beat/pedestrian-hurt-in-hit-and-run-2294760 RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 12:54 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: I am not missing the point. I actually addressed one of your points. You said "there is no legitimate reason whatsoever". I provided you with just one legitimate reason and I am confident there are many more reasons. If you don't like the rules and laws of engagement then advocate for change through the proper channels but don't arbitrarily say that the people are bad at their jobs. I suspect they followed the rules, and built this to conform with the rules to protect the public and the organization they work for. That means they actually did a good job. No, those are excuses. Reasons would be things like, the pedestrians actually want to go this way, and the fences protect private property of some kind. Neither of those are true. I don't consider fear of litigation or other excuses as actual reasons why the world should be bad, those are just systems that we invented to govern ourselves descending into dysfunction. The rules are open to interpretation, there is no law which says there must be a fence there, there might be a policy, there might have been a request, it would be the job of the people building it to push back against those things which make it worse. We do this reliably with roads....we rarely ever do it for pedestrians. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Rainrider22 - 04-30-2020 You are wrong. There are Rules and Regulations set out to follow for a reason. Most rules were not created out of something good. They were created out of necessity because something bad happened. Mitigating risk to others is never a bad thing even if it means you have to walk to the end of a pathway to get to where you want to go. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - jamincan - 04-30-2020 There are other examples of walkways adjacent to commercial properties that aren't fenced off, but there are also lots, probably the majority, of examples where they are fenced off. I agree with Dan that this is actually a fairly significant safety issue as it can prevent escape for a potential victim. In comparison, it's hard for me to believe that the risk to adjacent businesses is more than marginally higher. It's the sort of thing that would have been brought up immediately with public consultation. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Rainrider22 - 04-30-2020 It is fine to disagree when you are not the owner of the property who must do their due diligence. Dan is wrong to say the employees who planned this project are bad at their jobs. I was actually looking at this crossing in person just last week and I thought, wow, they did a great job. I am sure many people will see it as a good job as well. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Rainrider22 - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 12:55 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I think this is on point.How so... ? By your statements above with respect to rules and subject to interpretation , pedestrians should just cross a street anywhere they want.. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 01:35 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote:(04-30-2020, 12:55 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I think this is on point.How so... ? By your statements above with respect to rules and subject to interpretation , pedestrians should just cross a street anywhere they want.. So if you're not interested in a conversation, we don't have to discuss it. This is a driver who hit a pedestrian and then drove off, why are you defending them. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 01:31 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: It is fine to disagree when you are not the owner of the property who must do their due diligence. Dan is wrong to say the employees who planned this project are bad at their jobs. I was actually looking at this crossing in person just last week and I thought, wow, they did a great job. I am sure many people will see it as a good job as well. There are numerous examples of why this is poorly done, the temporary wooden structure is anti-pedestrian, the connection between the crossing and the sidewalk is poorly aligned, the use of accessibility plates makes no sense, and the fence is something that should never have happened. None of this means it isn't a crossing, but I'm not impressed. I am utterly sick and tired of excuses for why our region is anti-pedestrian. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 01:03 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: You are wrong. There are Rules and Regulations set out to follow for a reason. Most rules were not created out of something good. They were created out of necessity because something bad happened. Mitigating risk to others is never a bad thing even if it means you have to walk to the end of a pathway to get to where you want to go. These rules exist to mitigate risk to business, nothing matters more in our society, with the possible exception of free access by cars. And again, if these rules are to protect against something bad happening, they aren't functioning well and they shoudl have been worked around. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Rainrider22 - 04-30-2020 Please provide me where I stated I defend them ? You are blinded by your own personal bias. You often state people on this board dont know how to comprehend. You failed to comprehend what I stated. Time for self reflection and some emotional intelligence. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Acitta - 04-30-2020 I don't see why it is safer for pedestrians to walk across a parking lot from the front than walking the shorter distance across the parking lot from the side. It shows how little respect pedestrians have in this society when they are forced to walk across a parking lot to get to a business they wish to patronize. Retail businesses should be built right up to the sidewalk and parking lots should be located behind the buildings, but pedestrians are second class citizens so they do not build them that way. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 01:43 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: Please provide me where I stated I defend them ? You are blinded by your own personal bias. You often state people on this board dont know how to comprehend. You failed to comprehend what I stated. Time for self reflection and some emotional intelligence. Back up on that high horse again. I'm pointing out that we have yet another example of a driver running down a pedestrian in this area, and you're like "meh, not relevant", when it is in fact, the whole point, so yeah, continue to point fingers at me, maybe I was wrong to say you were defending them, but you are defending the status quo situation which creates harms like this. I've crossed that intersection a dozen times, I can see me being run over, and it makes me so angry. It's literally one of the worst places to be a pedestrian in the city, yet has a transit station... RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - Rainrider22 - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 01:52 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:First of all, I dont say "Meh", I am not 14 years old. You were saying above that is was ridiculous to have a fenced off walkway to keep pedestrian's safe from the vehicles in the parking lot. I am trying to understand why you are against a safety measure even if it is slightly inconvenient. Then you try to use an example of a pedestrian walking in a crosswalk who is struck by a vehicle as a "point" to a conversation about a private parking lot. You draw a conclusion that I have no compassion or sense of empathy for that unfortunate situation ? Then you need to add a comment about being on a high horse ? My comment about "Time for self reflection and some emotional intelligence" was a statement for me. Like, time for me to go have a drink.(04-30-2020, 01:43 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: Please provide me where I stated I defend them ? You are blinded by your own personal bias. You often state people on this board dont know how to comprehend. You failed to comprehend what I stated. Time for self reflection and some emotional intelligence. RE: ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit - danbrotherston - 04-30-2020 (04-30-2020, 02:16 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote:(04-30-2020, 01:52 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Back up on that high horse again.First of all, I dont say "Meh", I am not 14 years old. You were saying above that is was ridiculous to have a fenced off walkway to keep pedestrian's safe from the vehicles in the parking lot. I am trying to understand why you are against a safety measure even if it is slightly inconvenient. Then you try to use an example of a pedestrian walking in a crosswalk who is struck by a vehicle as a "point" to a conversation about a private parking lot. You draw a conclusion that I have no compassion or sense of empathy for that unfortunate situation ? Then you need to add a comment about being on a high horse ? My comment about "Time for self reflection and some emotional intelligence" was a statement for me. Like, time for me to go have a drink. It is not a safety measure. No person is protected by this from any harm. Businesses are protected from risk. You'll notice there are parking spaces directly along the fence, those spaces will be filled with cars...cars which have occupants....who will then walk to the business. Forcing someone to walk further through the parking lot does not make them safer. Nor will the fence stop an out of control car (although it could prevent someone from escaping an out of control person in or out of a car). So if we could stop pretending this is for anything other than protecting business from change, that'd be great. "My comment about "Time for self reflection and some emotional intelligence" was a statement for me." -- hey fair enough, but that sentence has no subject, and the previous three sentences had an explicit "you" as a the subject, so you'll have to forgive me for missinterpting. |