06-14-2020, 02:22 PM
(06-14-2020, 01:20 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(06-14-2020, 01:14 PM)Acitta Wrote: The plan shows more space being used for surface parking than the building. That is disappointing. There are a lot of trees on that block that will be lost to support car storage.
Quite. Although it's just a seller's mock-up, not a render of an actual proposed building.
But I expect that's driven by (1) the maximum floor area ratio and (2) the parking minima. Both are negotiable with the city, mind you.
We shouldn't have to negotiate for good developments, those should be required, if you want more surface parking, that you should have to negotiate for. *sigh*...