10-11-2016, 10:01 AM
(10-11-2016, 08:05 AM)danbrotherston Wrote:(10-11-2016, 07:36 AM)Owen Wrote: Looks like we'll finally see some action on this site - at least with part (2/3) of the lot:
http://www.therecord.com/whatson-story/6...r-decades/
There's going to be a 19 foot undeveloped section. What a waste. Private interests trumping public good.
(10-11-2016, 08:19 AM)Spokes Wrote: How on earth those two weren't merged was beyond me. How foolish.
From the article:
"We weren't able to conclude a deal with him," Riddoch said of that smaller lot.
And as I said
(04-25-2016, 12:15 PM)Markster Wrote: And you have to acquire the land, which I'm sure the current owner is going to sit on until they are convinced by a sufficiently large pile of dollars.
The owner of the small lot is probably trying to hold out for a far higher price per acre.
The developer has to move forward with what they have, in order to call the bluff.