04-25-2016, 10:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-25-2016, 10:54 AM by panamaniac.)
(04-25-2016, 10:50 AM)tomh009 Wrote:(04-25-2016, 10:24 AM)Markster Wrote: It's not about the courage to build zero parking; it's about the courage to fight city hall and the planning staff, and run the risk that your development will be unviable when they refuse to budge.
Also the courage of the city to accept a zero-parking option.
Would parking actually be required if this site were developed? As I recall, Ackers, like most of the old King Street builidngs, would have had a loading dock and possibly a space or two of parking at the back.