09-02-2017, 09:42 AM
(09-02-2017, 09:01 AM)ijmorlan Wrote:(09-01-2017, 09:49 PM)mcparkhill Wrote: The photo taken only makes the space look large because whoever owns the land now spent a lot of time manicuring the landscape and removing all the natural vegetation that was there, when you look at the distance between the train track, ION track and Courtland, you can see that clearly it is not an ideal spot for anyone to live.
My house only looks like a good place to live because previous owners of the land have cleared the forest, smoothed the ground, built roads, connected to the sewer, water, electricity, and gas supplies, constructed a building, installed a furnace… without any of those things, you can see that clearly it is not an ideal spot for anyone to live.
Anyway, if you’re right, they won’t be able to fill the towers at the intended sale/rental price and they will (eventually) go bankrupt.
I am curious as to what statistical, and or quantifiable data you are able to make this determination. Development companies do not typically adhoc spend millions of dollars oh a major project based on a whim or hope.