05-03-2021, 01:43 PM
As I slowly read through those comments, I am beginning to thing that any thing that submitted as a group/organisation should not get the benefit of privacy redaction. They need to be out in the open.
Also, I'm getting my blood pressure up at the some the outright falsehoods made in those emails and comments.
Email 15 (which was sent in again a multiple times as emails 16, 17, 19, 21) is a perfect(ly bad) example of both.
If there is no money spent on the LRT, they they cannot reevaluate anything because the staff time to do that reevaluation costs money.
The rest is an attempt to sound all "officialese" like they even know what they are talking about.
Also, I'm getting my blood pressure up at the some the outright falsehoods made in those emails and comments.
Email 15 (which was sent in again a multiple times as emails 16, 17, 19, 21) is a perfect(ly bad) example of both.
Quote:Considering these significant uncertainties and the controversy involving the proposed route, we think a ten year hiatus where no further money is spent on a fixed route LRT would give the planners and elected politicians the opportunity to evaluate the following:
If there is no money spent on the LRT, they they cannot reevaluate anything because the staff time to do that reevaluation costs money.
The rest is an attempt to sound all "officialese" like they even know what they are talking about.