Hey Guest,
Welcome, Join our awesome community where you can discuss on various topics
or Create an Account


Welcome Guest! In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away. Click here to get started.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ION Phase 2 - Cambridge's Light Rail Transit
(02-13-2018, 12:04 PM)Canard Wrote: Everyone in Preston is bitching they don’t want it

Come now; a vocal minority in Preston is expressing displeasure. There are, I'm sure, many who would like access to that level of transit but for whatever reason are not speaking up. Let's not leave them in the cold.
My Twitter: @KevinLMaps
Reply
Referendum then.
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
Although I think it is a terrible decision to leave yourself out of transit, and Cambridge will again pay for it as they did their busing choices, I have to agree adding it to the highway would be fun.

I found this line pretty funny though: “Can you imagine? Going down Shantz Hill is like taking the LRT over Niagara Falls.”

As if somehow trains are more unsafe than cars (with largely untrained drivers) or walking/biking down the hill.
Reply
LOL, yup. Just uninformed people who haven’t ever left the city and have no clue how transit works and what it is capable of in other cities...
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
The current state of opposition to Phase 2, straight from the head of "Stop the LRT Thru Preston". They still claim the proposed route would "destroy" up to 100 properties in Preston, and they're now teaming up with residents of several Kitchener neighbourhoods in attempt to keep the route off King St and Shantz Hill as well. They still want the region to go with their alternate route to nowhere up Highway 8 and the 401.

Bring 'a strong voice' against LRT route
Reply
Well at least she got one thing right:

Quote:It is imperative that you attend one of these meetings. You need to give the region your comments.
Reply
(04-19-2018, 11:04 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: They still claim the proposed route would "destroy" up to 100 properties in Preston…

I’m not completely up to speed on all details, but isn’t that an actual lie? My understanding is that very few, certainly not 100, properties are needed in full — in most cases it’s just a narrow strip along the road that wouldn’t even hit the news if it was a road widening project.
Reply
It's the strategy of filling the void. We know enough to know that to run the route as proposed, there would be *some* effect on 100 properties. But until we do the work of designing the route, we don't know exactly how much they would be affected by (because we won't do detailed work on all umpteen different route possibilities). So into the void, this group launches your worst fears, that 100 homes will be destroyed.
Reply
PCC 4 Docs are up: http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/...ackage.pdf http://rapidtransit.regionofwaterloo.ca/...Boards.pdf

Survey for PCC 4: https://www.opentownhall.com/portals/274/Issue_6211
Reply
So here's the meatiest bit:

[Image: 36nj.jpg]

The red line is the preferred option. Avoiding conflicts in the Eagle-south-of-King area by hugging the Speed shoreline and cutting across the Chopin/Queenston block with an off-street station. Will be more costly and have more natural impacts, but everything else is said to work better.
My Twitter: @KevinLMaps
Reply
Now to sit back and watch all the NIMBYs reject them all.
Reply
(04-27-2018, 04:50 PM)bgb_ca Wrote: Now to sit back and watch all the NIMBYs reject them all.

We just need to get Rob “Subways, subways, subways!” Ford up to Cambridge to assist them.
Reply
(04-27-2018, 04:50 PM)bgb_ca Wrote: Now to sit back and watch all the NIMBYs reject them all.

I can see Cambridge council passing a motion to reject this latest route
Reply
I saw this in The Record, including an artist's impression of the crossing at Shantz Hill.

https://www.therecord.com/news-story/857...le-street/

Quote:Schmidt said the impact on the intersection will be relatively small. Light rail trains are not like emergency vehicles, which automatically trigger a traffic light change to proceed through an intersection.

Trains may modify a light if running a bit behind schedule, either extending a green light or shortening a red light.

"It's more of a slight modification rather than a hard stop each time the train comes," Schmidt said. "It's designed to work with the network."

That doesn't seem to be how I've heard it described in the past. I thought trains were going to get a higher priority.
Reply
We’ll have to see. The Keolis folks at the last OMSF Open House were adamant that trains would never hit a red light.

I suspect the reality will be somewhere between Keolis’ description and the very passive “we don’t want to anger drivers” comments by the Regional staff.
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links

              Advertise