Winter Walking and Cycling

[the_councillor]

I think it's just further showing that this bylaw is broken

It is. The bylaw is clear in the standards it imposes on property owners. Very few property owners are in compliance with it for any length of time during the winter. Those are not the standards the municipal government would set for itself if it didn't delegate the work.

This is correct and we will fix it.  The notices to those that made a legitimate effort was an unintended consequence.  Bare pavement is service level the city/region cannot achieve in many cases and should not be applied to residents IMO.  Something like "Safely/Accessibly traversable" makes more sense than "bare pavement" and gives bylaw the discretion they should have.