06-06-2021, 11:11 AM
(06-06-2021, 09:47 AM)ac3r Wrote: Yeah. There ought to be some sort of way to ensure that a building is architecturally acceptable. An issue with doing that, though, is that it can act as a hinderance to developers. If a developer can't afford a really good architect or materials, a building may not get built. For affordable housing or just smaller projects, this can be an issue. But for something of this scale, they should have done a better job at the design. They can afford it.
I am not an architect (although I do love architecture). But I suspect that this kind of post-design cost-cutting by the developer is bound to produce sub-optimal results.
A good architect would likely be able to make a better (but different) design if the final cost constraints were to be clear at the start, rather than being foisted upon the architect once the original design had already been completed.