Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 6 Vote(s) - 2.83 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
General Urban Cambridge Updates and Rumours
#70
(11-09-2016, 12:33 PM)timc Wrote: It is not illegal, and pet ownership isn't covered by human rights.

At the same time, you can't have a "no pets" clause in your lease, so you can't be evicted for having a pet after you have a lease agreement. However, if the pets become a nuisance for the landlord or other tenants, then you or your pet can be forced to leave.

Something I’m unclear on is whether a “no pets of this type” clause might be enforceable, on the grounds that the “type” in question is inherently disruptive, possibly in the context of a specific building. So, I know that “no pets at all” is unenforceable, but what about “no dogs over 30kg”? I guess it might come down to whether the landlord could prove the pet was a nuisance, which might mean the specific lease provision would be irrelevant anyway.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: General Urban Cambridge Updates and Rumours - by ijmorlan - 11-09-2016, 03:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links