11-09-2015, 06:34 PM
(11-09-2015, 05:59 PM)SammyOES Wrote: No offense, but those numbers don't really seem particularly relevant to the cost of a suburban road or cul-de-sac in Guelph.
There's a huge difference between costs paid by a developer or paid by the city. The developer portion isn't a subsidy by any definition of the word. It's a cost born by a private company that is making profit on the enterprise.
I also don't find the "an additional $1 subsidy per transit rider looks a lot..." line of reasoning very compelling either. It's lazy logic that could be used to justify almost anything.
Actually they give a rather good ball park figure where the costs are. You simply find the subsidy too jarring: the data is there, from three different sources.
And my point stands, people who are unaware of the true costs of transportation are shocked at $1-2 subsidy for transit passengers while unbeknownst to them similar costs are incurred by driving, much to their surprise.