Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vogue Residences (née District Condos) | 21 + 14 fl | U/C
#38
(10-08-2015, 05:15 PM)BuildingScout Wrote: I'm ok with the building and frankly rather surprised at the lukewarm reception it got here. Here's why I think it is a building we should support:
  • It takes the trouble to preserve the heritage house
  • Enclosed in glass houses, while new to some, work well in practice. Check out Bell Canada place in T.O. for an example.
  • It would the tallest building in town. It's been almost 30 years since the previous record holder got built. Time to build a taller one.
  • It continues connecting Uptown with Northdale. This is a good thing.
  • It casts a shadow on the school during the hottest months of the summer while allowing sun light in the winter, just the way a properly planted tree is supposed to.
  • It's full of single units where vacancy rate is lowest.
  • It hides the parking spots.
  • It's mixed usage.
  • It's street facing.
  • It's podium and tower.
Sure the design isn't exactly the most daring, but it isn't horrid either.

On point one, I'm surprised since you're often the one to take pains to point out that a given building isn't heritage. This one isn't, and probably has not a lot of heritage. However...

Point two- yes, enclosing houses in glass is great. It would be great to try it out in the Region, if only to prove that it's a valid way to preserve heritage while allowing development in the future.

Point three...the tallest building in the city should have a lot demanded of it design-wise.

You're right on the rest. It's street-facing and podium-and-tower and mixed use. It's good. But the design is only not horrid. I never would have thought of the prominence of the site, but Markster is right that it will be very visible. So something really not horrid would be called for.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: 151 King St | 83m | 26 fl | Proposed - by MidTowner - 10-08-2015, 07:04 PM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by ac3r - 07-16-2020, 11:05 AM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by EdM - 07-16-2020, 12:07 PM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by ac3r - 03-23-2021, 12:13 PM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by ac3r - 03-23-2021, 10:08 PM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by nms - 03-24-2021, 12:12 AM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by ac3r - 03-26-2021, 11:21 AM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by ac3r - 03-24-2021, 11:27 AM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by ac3r - 03-24-2021, 03:01 PM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by CP42 - 09-22-2021, 03:54 PM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by Lens - 09-24-2021, 08:47 PM
RE: District Condos | 22 + 14 fl | U/C - by CP42 - 10-28-2021, 10:30 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links