12-20-2023, 09:58 AM
(12-19-2023, 11:37 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:(12-19-2023, 10:46 AM)SF22 Wrote: No pedestrian connection to the southeast (Adam St), which always confused me.
My recollection is that it was originally marketed as 5 Adam, but they couldn’t reach a deal with the New Apostolic Church to buy their overflow parking lot at the end of Adam St., nor to provide access. It’s obvious that it would be better for the City as a whole if Victoria Marie Ct. was an extension of Adam St. rather than being separate, especially with no pedestrian connection.
I could also be quite wrong in my memory.
That would certainly explain it. It's a shame, because it would certainly improve access to the #4 bus that runs down Margaret. I hope we see more willingness from private entities to string their properties together with pedestrian pathways to create internal networks within a single block.