Yes, the original proposal was for townhouses. The article does mention the other previous plan for three houses, which was also turned down by council (staff report), and that is when things went to the OMB.
Anyway, I'm just glad that something is going to be done with this parcel. It has been vacant for over thirty years. I can understand area residents' concern about traffic at that corner, but really, quibbling over three houses vs. two seems a bit much.
Does anyone know what is going to happen with the now-vacant lot on the southwest corner of that intersection, where the WNHydro structure was?
Anyway, I'm just glad that something is going to be done with this parcel. It has been vacant for over thirty years. I can understand area residents' concern about traffic at that corner, but really, quibbling over three houses vs. two seems a bit much.
Does anyone know what is going to happen with the now-vacant lot on the southwest corner of that intersection, where the WNHydro structure was?