01-08-2016, 10:32 AM
(01-08-2016, 10:10 AM)MidTowner Wrote: I didn't actually use the term "nightmare," that was someone else. I agree that it's probably unavoidable. Post 321 makes some good points: we are necessarily going to be stuck with a less-than-desirable experience for people on foot going under the underpass. That makes it even more important to ensure a positive experience at the King's Crossing site, and other nearby sites. Otherwise, we wind up with a really lengthy stretch of our main street which is hostile to people on foot.
I am in agreement with this.
What I was complaining was the hyperbole characterization of an underpass as a "pedestrian nightmare" (and, no, not by you).