04-09-2021, 07:52 PM
(04-09-2021, 06:30 PM)KevinL Wrote: The article does state that funding is mainly to replace its base wooden beam with a concealed steel beam, so presumably it could handle vehicles better once upgraded.
I mean, not only is it work that isn't needed if we would close it to cars, it is actually corrupting the heritage value of the bridge by replacing the traditional structure with a modern structure.
Like I said, if "heritage advocates" actually cared about heritage, they'd be objecting to cars on this bridge instead of opposing sidewalks and bike lanes and housing.