Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Waterloo Region's Architectural Hall of Shame -- the Bottom 10
#16
(12-15-2014, 02:09 PM)BuildingScout Wrote: In my opinion bad reproductions of a style that has no connection to the region, with the town having been settled in 1880 and not 1380 are as bad as a big box store. Slightly more charming but equally misguided and architecturally limp.

I'll interpret that as hyperbole. Big box stores are legitimately terrible. Ugly buildings are just ugly but otherwise don't actively harm the urban form (or at least this building doesn't).
Reply


« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Waterloo Region's Architectural Hall of Shame -- the Bottom 10 - by plam - 12-15-2014, 04:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links