06-11-2021, 08:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-11-2021, 08:34 AM by danbrotherston.)
Okay, I don't understand what this discussion is even about, didn't we have a regional plan already, that was heavily compromised to favour sprawl developers, but none the less approved.
Now they're asking for more?!
https://www.therecord.com/news/council/2...-land.html
Also, explain to me why these folks are arguing that dense walkable developments are "unaffordable" yet the market (you know the thing which decides prices) wants sprawl instead? If housing is unaffordable, it's because it's in demand and supply hasn't met demand. Sooooooo....the market WANTS urban walkable development, not cheap sprawl.
Now they're asking for more?!
https://www.therecord.com/news/council/2...-land.html
Also, explain to me why these folks are arguing that dense walkable developments are "unaffordable" yet the market (you know the thing which decides prices) wants sprawl instead? If housing is unaffordable, it's because it's in demand and supply hasn't met demand. Sooooooo....the market WANTS urban walkable development, not cheap sprawl.