Other Forum Issues

[clasher]

I never visit the site if I'm using data anymore, it blows through my meager data plan in a hurry.

[danbrotherston]

I seem to be unable to remove an attachment from this post:

http://www.waterlooregionconnected.com/s...6&page=216

(The first on the page).

I realized it was too high resolution, so I scaled it down, but when I click "remove attachment" on the old (large) image, it just leaves the editor and goes to the forum thread, and the attachement is still there.

[tomh009]

Yeah, that's a forum bug. I have unapproved the attachment for now (so it won't display) but only an admin (i.e. @Spokes) can actually remove an attachment.

[danbrotherston]

Yeah, that's a forum bug. I have unapproved the attachment for now (so it won't display) but only an admin (i.e. @Spokes) can actually remove an attachment.

Thanks!

[Spokes]

Thanks Tom!

Dan, unfortunately you're not the only one this has happened to. Tom's workaround seems to be the best option at this point unfortunately.

[danbrotherston]

Thanks Tom!

Dan, unfortunately you're not the only one this has happened to.  Tom's workaround seems to be the best option at this point unfortunately.

Yeah, I mean, it's not a big issue for me right now, so Tom's fix is sufficient.

[danbrotherston]

So I've run out of photo quota, is there any way to increase it, or alternatively remove old photos?

[timio]

FYI: wrconnected.com is currently showing as parked with a Hostinger splash page.

[Spokes]

Thanks for the heads up! The redirect must not have transferred.

[Spokes]

You'll notice that the Downtowns subforum is now "Urban Areas".

This helps us avoid the issues of classifying projects that aren't in downtowns specifically but aren't suburban.

[panamaniac]

You'll notice that the Downtowns subforum is now "Urban Areas".

This helps us avoid the issues of classifying projects that aren't in downtowns specifically but aren't suburban.

Not sure I follow.  Will the distinction be based on location, or on the size/density of the project?

[tomh009]

You'll notice that the Downtowns subforum is now "Urban Areas".

This helps us avoid the issues of classifying projects that aren't in downtowns specifically but aren't suburban.

Not sure I follow.  Will the distinction be based on location, or on the size/density of the project?

Location. But "urban" is not quite as limiting as "DTK".

[danbrotherston]

Not sure I follow.  Will the distinction be based on location, or on the size/density of the project?

Location. But "urban" is not quite as limiting as "DTK".

Lol...both DTK and Urban are both open to some interpretation...  

I'm getting that itch to create a map...I mean, Kitchener already has one for Downtown that we could argue about https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGen...nities.pdf.

[panamaniac]

Location. But "urban" is not quite as limiting as "DTK".

Lol...both DTK and Urban are both open to some interpretation...  

I'm getting that itch to create a map...I mean, Kitchener already has one for Downtown that we could argue about https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGen...nities.pdf.

It's easy to the "east" and the "south", because the expressway.  To the "north" and "west" it's arguably trickier, although Westmount and University offer simplicity of definition.  To me "urban" looks a lot like K-W circa pre-1970s, while "suburban" is K-W post-1970s, roughly speaking.

[ijmorlan]

Lol...both DTK and Urban are both open to some interpretation...  

I'm getting that itch to create a map...I mean, Kitchener already has one for Downtown that we could argue about https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGen...nities.pdf.

It's easy to the "east" and the "south", because the expressway.  To the "north" and "west" it's arguably trickier, although Westmount and University offer simplicity of definition.  To me "urban" looks a lot like K-W circa pre-1970s, while "suburban" is K-W post-1970s, roughly speaking.

1950

But I’m much older than my birth certificate would suggest