Walking in Waterloo Region

[Bytor]

I can understand, if you misrepresent that general intent of that statement, how you might call it sexist. But homophobic?

The "general intent" of that statement, regardless of any debate on the exact type of insult it was, is that it was intended to be an insult with which to dismiss the presented opinions and facts about how SUVs affect pedestrian safety and how their adoption has been encouraged by government policies and corporate greed rather than try and refute them in a good faith discussion.

Don't participate in the derailing by arguing the exact type of insult it was, just hold Ac3r to account for the insult and bad-faith actions.