Hey Guest,
Welcome, Join our awesome community where you can discuss on various topics
or Create an Account


Welcome Guest! In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away. Click here to get started.

Dear WRConnected Users: WOW! Our fourth "birthday"! We've grown so much over the past four years, and much of that is because of you, the amazing WRConnected Users. But like any other website, there are costs associated with running it. As some of you may already know, we accept donations. Some of you have made donations (thank you!). This helps cover some of the background costs associated with running this site. If every user were to donate $1 we would more than cover our yearly expenses. If WRConnected is useful to you, take a minute and help keep it online for another year. Any donation is helpful. Thank you.

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Walking in Waterloo Region
An undesired contact occurred between two pedestrians and an automobile in Cambridge yesterday:

https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1452350
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
Level 2 pedestrian crosswalks being recommended at King and Cameron (page 21) and midblock on Walter (page 31).
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.
Reply
(08-06-2018, 12:22 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: Level 2 pedestrian crosswalks being recommended at King and Cameron (page 21) and midblock on Walter (page 31).

Thanks for the info!

They have a bit of a funny error on Page 23, where they have the warrant table, where they state traffic must be < 4,500 vehicles over an 8 hour period, and the actual value is 6,502 and then state that this is satisfied.  Of course, if you look in the actual appendix the number is 6000 - 7,500 vehicles over an 8 hour period.

It's worth noting here though, that this is still an onerous unnecessary and broken process for installing crossings.

Worst, it still requires a warrant of existing crossings, which is just stupid, how engineers don't get this, I cannot comprehend.

There are about 2-3 dozen places (2-3 in Vic park alone) in the city (just where I know of, never mind places I don't frequent), where I think a crossing is warranted, and I know it's warranted based on the local context, whether or not traffic justifies it.  But at each one, this whole study would be required, plus 20k for installation.

*sigh*...

But hey, I'm glad they're putting one in here.

Worth noting these crossings are better in every way than an IPS.  Neither pedestrians, nor drivers have to wait unnecessarily, peds get the right of way immediately, and drivers can proceed when peds are clear, neither of which are true at an IPS.
Reply
...IPS?
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
[Image: LvFwD1w.png]
Reply
Apparently I'm using that term wrong.

By IPS I meant traffic signals for pedestrians. In the case of Cameron, it would be an IPS because it's at an intersection, but there are other cases where you would put signals, but not at an intersection. For some reason, those have a different name.
Reply
Probably because according to McBob's photo, they have completely different infrastructure surrounding them.
For daily ion construction updates, photos and general urban rail news, follow me on twitter! @Canardiain
Reply
(08-06-2018, 01:09 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Worth noting these crossings are better in every way than an IPS.  Neither pedestrians, nor drivers have to wait unnecessarily, peds get the right of way immediately, and drivers can proceed when peds are clear, neither of which are true at an IPS.

I agree so hard.

I hate almost every single pedestrian crossing in the region that uses traditional traffic lights instead of a crossover.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links

              Advertise