Posts: 4,323
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
179
(06-05-2017, 09:10 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: (06-05-2017, 08:29 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: Is there any possibility of a median? In combination with your other proposals, this could provide crossing refuge space, either everywhere or in many individual locations (say, every 20-30m), which would make it even easier for pedestrian and vehicular traffic to co-exist.
While this is perhaps a reasonable idea, medians (I believe refuge islands included) necessitate extremely wide lanes (4.8 meters), which would be worse than no median IMO.
I think narrow lanes, cobbles, whatever it takes to show this is a shared space should be the minimum. There'd even be room for the, by some miracle, controversial sidewalk then.
?? Why does a median require wider lanes? If the lane is wide enough, it’s wide enough, whether or not it is next to the other-direction lane. I might see it on an arterial, where large trucks need to be able to go and maybe you even want to allow for vehicles to slowly pass a stopped vehicle, but through the park I would go with the narrowest workable lanes (2.5m? I don’t know — how wide is a truck, anyway?), separated by a 2m median. Or some such. Not sure exactly.
Posts: 7,572
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
196
(06-05-2017, 09:23 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: (06-05-2017, 09:10 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: While this is perhaps a reasonable idea, medians (I believe refuge islands included) necessitate extremely wide lanes (4.8 meters), which would be worse than no median IMO.
I think narrow lanes, cobbles, whatever it takes to show this is a shared space should be the minimum. There'd even be room for the, by some miracle, controversial sidewalk then.
?? Why does a median require wider lanes? If the lane is wide enough, it’s wide enough, whether or not it is next to the other-direction lane. I might see it on an arterial, where large trucks need to be able to go and maybe you even want to allow for vehicles to slowly pass a stopped vehicle, but through the park I would go with the narrowest workable lanes (2.5m? I don’t know — how wide is a truck, anyway?), separated by a 2m median. Or some such. Not sure exactly.
It's city policy. Ostensibly, it is to allow plowing operations, because plows need more space to operate. But you can go argue with city policy makers if you like.
Posts: 4,323
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
179
(06-05-2017, 09:37 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: (06-05-2017, 09:23 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: ?? Why does a median require wider lanes? If the lane is wide enough, it’s wide enough, whether or not it is next to the other-direction lane. I might see it on an arterial, where large trucks need to be able to go and maybe you even want to allow for vehicles to slowly pass a stopped vehicle, but through the park I would go with the narrowest workable lanes (2.5m? I don’t know — how wide is a truck, anyway?), separated by a 2m median. Or some such. Not sure exactly.
It's city policy. Ostensibly, it is to allow plowing operations, because plows need more space to operate. But you can go argue with city policy makers if you like.
OK, I get it. So the city could just get smaller plows, or use the sidewalk plows to plow that particular road, or make the median level with the traffic lanes but built out of cobbles (except for frequent pedestrian crossings), or any number of creative solutions to this unusual situation.
Posts: 395
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
9
Jubilee between Park and David would be a perfect spot for speed cameras. You can put all the traffic calming measures you want in, but the best deterrent is hitting the pocketbook.
Posts: 6,468
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
85
What are the accident/casualty numbers like on Jubilee, I wonder?
Posts: 2,015
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
77
According to city of kitchener open data:
9 collisions since 2006 with no increasing trend.
6 were under clear conditions.
5 were in daylight hours.
3 at private drive ways + 3 mid-block.
The above categories are not mutually exclusive (e.g. A crash could be in daylight, under clear conditions, at a private driveway).
Still a little high given small traffic volume.
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
06-05-2017, 12:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2017, 12:23 PM by Canard.)
What are the collision rates at the Victoria/West area (where the IHT crosses)?
Every single time I bike through here, and merge in with traffic and cross at the intersection (as instructed by signage), I always end up passing the same people again who have not obeyed the signage, and simply cut across the road.
Posts: 10,272
Threads: 65
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
294
(06-05-2017, 05:38 AM)jamincan Wrote: I personally think they should keep it, but put in on a heavy diet. Narrower lanes, a boulevard, and cobbles, and then clear demarcations that pedestrians have the right-of-way at any point along the entire length through the park.
I walk along and/or cross there (within the park) daily, and I'm not finding a major traffic issue there. But maybe my criteria are too relaxed?
Posts: 10,272
Threads: 65
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
294
(06-05-2017, 09:10 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I think narrow lanes, cobbles, whatever it takes to show this is a shared space should be the minimum. There'd even be room for the, by some miracle, controversial sidewalk then.
The north-side sidewalk was built last fall already.
Posts: 2,163
Threads: 17
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
76
(06-05-2017, 12:41 PM)tomh009 Wrote: (06-05-2017, 09:10 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I think narrow lanes, cobbles, whatever it takes to show this is a shared space should be the minimum. There'd even be room for the, by some miracle, controversial sidewalk then.
The north-side sidewalk was built last fall already.
The north side sidewalk is incomplete, and they only built it part of the way through the park.
Posts: 7,572
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
196
(06-05-2017, 12:38 PM)tomh009 Wrote: (06-05-2017, 05:38 AM)jamincan Wrote: I personally think they should keep it, but put in on a heavy diet. Narrower lanes, a boulevard, and cobbles, and then clear demarcations that pedestrians have the right-of-way at any point along the entire length through the park.
I walk along and/or cross there (within the park) daily, and I'm not finding a major traffic issue there. But maybe my criteria are too relaxed?
I would think your criteria are too relaxed. I consider there to be a traffic issue when I am a) held up by, or b) made uncomfortable by car traffic within a park.
Posts: 7,572
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
196
(06-05-2017, 12:52 PM)Markster Wrote: (06-05-2017, 12:41 PM)tomh009 Wrote: The north-side sidewalk was built last fall already.
The north side sidewalk is incomplete, and they only built it part of the way through the park.
Depends on your definition of "complete"...as far as the city is concerned it is complete. How in the world there is contention about a sidewalk in a park, I will never know.
Posts: 7,572
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
196
Accident rates do not tell the whole story. Just because there are few/no accidents does not mean it isn't an inconvenient, uncomfortable, disruptive, or disincentivising of active transportation crossing. This is true for both West/Victoria/IHT and the park.
Posts: 6,468
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
85
It's certainly true that the crossing near the Boathouse is inconvenient - at the moment, it seems that the cars have right of way, which needs to be put right.
Posts: 7,572
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
196
06-05-2017, 06:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2017, 06:32 PM by danbrotherston.)
(06-05-2017, 04:59 PM)panamaniac Wrote: It's certainly true that the crossing near the Boathouse is inconvenient - at the moment, it seems that the cars have right of way, which needs to be put right.
There's no 'seems' about it. Cars have the right of way at all crossings within the park. Of course, they often yield, which is even worse because it becomes inconsistent. I'm fairly sure the right of way policy actually happening is pessimal.
|