11-04-2020, 12:51 PM
(11-02-2020, 09:18 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I stand by my rejection of that assertion.
Again, even if you think there is a tiny slice of leased land there, the sign is positioned such that there is not enough space for a car to park between the sign and the sidewalk. There are minimum standards for the width of a parking space which this does not meet. And unlike sidewalks and bike lanes, there are no exceptions for undersized vehicle infrastructure.
(11-02-2020, 09:18 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Third, as I already said, the use of "private property" on the signage is incorrect, that is not private property, there is no private property.
Your original comment (Quoted second) was what I was referencing. You said the sign was wrong as it is not private property. You are now discounting the signage based on your belief it should not be a parking spot public or private. I can't answer that.
Coke