10-02-2020, 05:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-02-2020, 05:34 PM by danbrotherston.)
(10-02-2020, 04:53 PM)dtkvictim Wrote: I'm not really familiar with this project, but some of those answers seem quite disappointing.
Those answers are beyond disappointing:
Question:
"Why don’t the one-way cycle tracks connect to King Street in Alternative 1? Removing the existing right-turn lane at King Street would provide enough space to do so."
Answer:
"Strictly in terms of capacity, the traffic assessment notes that removing the southwest bound dedicated right-turn lane is possible; however, this lane provides an important connection for turning vehicles from the adjacent properties to the north given sightline constraints"
Translation:
"We absolutely could, but we don't want too, cycling is connections are not a priority, even in the face of excess road capacity."
Truly pathetic answers.
I especially love how they call out that cycling infra is required in the cycling plan between King and Margarette, yet they justify not building it to King.