12-05-2017, 10:42 AM
I still don't see that as being incremental. The work was planned in absence of that funding. The province SHOULD require the money be spent on projects that otherwise would not have proceeded.
The City could argue that the timeline was accelerated, but that's not a very strong argument. It could also argue that it had planned on those projects on paper, but wasn't actually going to do them. I don't know what you would call that.
The City could argue that the timeline was accelerated, but that's not a very strong argument. It could also argue that it had planned on those projects on paper, but wasn't actually going to do them. I don't know what you would call that.