Why not? There's not a significant difference between red lights and stop signs, is there?
The Idaho rule makes sense. You can't apply the same rules to a one-tonne vehicle capable of quickly accelerating to high speeds as you do to a human-powered bicycle.
The Paris compromise in particular seems like a sensible start. No left turns on red for now, just right turns and straight-through at 'T' intersections. Motorists here shouldn't be able to claim too credibly that that somehow represents entitlement on the part of cyclists.
The Idaho rule makes sense. You can't apply the same rules to a one-tonne vehicle capable of quickly accelerating to high speeds as you do to a human-powered bicycle.
The Paris compromise in particular seems like a sensible start. No left turns on red for now, just right turns and straight-through at 'T' intersections. Motorists here shouldn't be able to claim too credibly that that somehow represents entitlement on the part of cyclists.