04-13-2022, 04:13 PM
(04-13-2022, 03:10 PM)dtkvictim Wrote:(04-13-2022, 01:04 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I haven't looked at the plans recently, but I would think they'd only need to take the two trees on one side...one of which doesn't look too healthy.
But yeah, I suspect that will be the cost.
FWIW...I don't know why they are continuing with the Ontario section, given that they seem to be unwilling to continue it to Duke St. ending it at King doesn't help build a grid.
I think a bigger win would be to negotiate with the region on building a section along Victoria, plus improve the infra and continuity along Young/Guakel.
But that's a pretty hard pivot to make now.
The other ambitious plan would be to build it along Queen St...but that road was just rebuilt and they opted out of cycling infra...which is sad...it really is a good place for it. Oh well, try again in 50 years....
Isn't that section of Duke going to be without cycling infrastructure anyways? It's not a grid whether it goes to King or to Duke...
Selfishly this Ontario segment will serve me well in one direction, so I'm happy. But otherwise I share in the disappointment.
Heh...yeah, that too.
*sigh*...