05-01-2020, 10:50 PM
(04-30-2020, 03:40 PM)jeffster Wrote:Actually the existing parking lots are two separate pieces of property. The owners of Parts Source a (stand-alone building) may not appreciate someone parking on their lot and then heading over to the bank or vice versa.(04-30-2020, 10:59 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Oh FFS...stupid f***ing fence...
Honestly, we don't have fences like that on sidewalks, nothing more than spending money to make ped infra less convenient, more oppressive and more dangerous (from a social safety perspective)....who does this, and why are they so bad at their jobs.
Edit: Also the sidewalk transition is terrible, and the accessibility plates make zero sense.
Not understanding the long fence either. It's an inconvenience not only to those crossing, but also anyone that may drive to one store and wish to shop at another.
So the question is: was there a fence there before? That would seem to be the only legitimate excuse.
Just checked -- no fence. I would have said that perhaps RBC wanted the fence there as a level of security, but a fence wouldn't need to enclose the walk way. So my other guess is that this is a safety measure, as the region bought the land that was separating the property the bank is on and the property that Part Source is on. Safety to pedestrians from walking on the lot rather than sidewalk.
Could also be some other legal reason I am sure.