04-30-2020, 01:40 PM
(04-30-2020, 01:31 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote: It is fine to disagree when you are not the owner of the property who must do their due diligence. Dan is wrong to say the employees who planned this project are bad at their jobs. I was actually looking at this crossing in person just last week and I thought, wow, they did a great job. I am sure many people will see it as a good job as well.
There are numerous examples of why this is poorly done, the temporary wooden structure is anti-pedestrian, the connection between the crossing and the sidewalk is poorly aligned, the use of accessibility plates makes no sense, and the fence is something that should never have happened.
None of this means it isn't a crossing, but I'm not impressed.
I am utterly sick and tired of excuses for why our region is anti-pedestrian.